“They didn't think we'd do it!”: Community gardening as an act of resistance for people with dementia

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Sarah Swift , Nicholas Jenkins , Margaret Brown , Marjorie McCrory
{"title":"“They didn't think we'd do it!”: Community gardening as an act of resistance for people with dementia","authors":"Sarah Swift ,&nbsp;Nicholas Jenkins ,&nbsp;Margaret Brown ,&nbsp;Marjorie McCrory","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People living with dementia commonly report negative experiences such as disempowerment, stigma, and oppression. Community gardening has demonstrated its potential as a forum for the practice of resistance against the oppressions experienced by other marginalised groups; however, this element of the experience of community gardening has yet to be explored in the context of dementia. A collaboratively-designed community gardening project took place over six weeks, involving six people with dementia. The participants selected all activities undertaken in the garden. Data were collected through semi-structured group interviews with the gardeners and researcher observations. Context-setting semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with four day centre staff members, and three key informants who had experienced working with people with dementia in the garden. The garden acted as a platform for the articulation of both verbal and embodied expressions of resistance against the disempowerment and loss of agency experienced by many people with dementia. The participatory design of the gardening sessions enabled the gardeners to assert their autonomy and independence, and defy the negative stereotypes associated with dementia, which some of the group members appeared to have internalised. Community gardening activities may offer a forum for expressions of resistance against the structures oppressing individuals with dementia. However, in order for this potential to be unlocked, such initiatives must be collaboratively designed, following an approach which recognises the strengths and enduring abilities of people living with dementia. Additionally, the empowering impact of community gardening should not be diluted by positioning the activity as a substitute for adequate statutory health and social care provision, thereby individualising responsibility for the wellbeing of people with dementia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000112/pdfft?md5=12490c454eb81b67682e676808ec7051&pid=1-s2.0-S0890406524000112-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People living with dementia commonly report negative experiences such as disempowerment, stigma, and oppression. Community gardening has demonstrated its potential as a forum for the practice of resistance against the oppressions experienced by other marginalised groups; however, this element of the experience of community gardening has yet to be explored in the context of dementia. A collaboratively-designed community gardening project took place over six weeks, involving six people with dementia. The participants selected all activities undertaken in the garden. Data were collected through semi-structured group interviews with the gardeners and researcher observations. Context-setting semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with four day centre staff members, and three key informants who had experienced working with people with dementia in the garden. The garden acted as a platform for the articulation of both verbal and embodied expressions of resistance against the disempowerment and loss of agency experienced by many people with dementia. The participatory design of the gardening sessions enabled the gardeners to assert their autonomy and independence, and defy the negative stereotypes associated with dementia, which some of the group members appeared to have internalised. Community gardening activities may offer a forum for expressions of resistance against the structures oppressing individuals with dementia. However, in order for this potential to be unlocked, such initiatives must be collaboratively designed, following an approach which recognises the strengths and enduring abilities of people living with dementia. Additionally, the empowering impact of community gardening should not be diluted by positioning the activity as a substitute for adequate statutory health and social care provision, thereby individualising responsibility for the wellbeing of people with dementia.

"他们没想到我们会这么做!":社区园艺是痴呆症患者的一种反抗行为
痴呆症患者通常会有一些负面的经历,如丧失权能、耻辱感和压迫感。社区园艺已经证明了其作为抵制其他边缘化群体所经历的压迫的实践场所的潜力;然而,在痴呆症的背景下,社区园艺体验的这一要素还有待于探索。一个合作设计的社区园艺项目历时六周,有六名痴呆症患者参与。园艺项目的所有活动都由参与者自己选择。通过对园丁进行半结构化小组访谈和研究人员的观察收集数据。对四名日间中心工作人员和三名曾在花园中与痴呆症患者共事的关键信息提供者进行了设定情境的半结构化个人访谈。花园作为一个平台,为许多痴呆症患者提供了语言和行为表达方式,以反抗他们所经历的权能被剥夺和代理权丧失。园艺活动的参与性设计使园艺家们能够坚持自己的自主性和独立性,并蔑视与痴呆症相关的负面刻板印象,而一些小组成员似乎已经将这些刻板印象内化了。社区园艺活动可以为表达对压迫痴呆症患者的结构的反抗提供一个平台。然而,为了释放这种潜能,必须合作设计此类活动,并采用一种承认痴呆症患者的长处和持久能力的方法。此外,不应将社区园艺活动定位为替代适当的法定医疗和社会护理服务,从而淡化其对痴呆症患者福祉的个人责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信