Reluctance to Make a "Blind Faith Jump": LGBTQ+ College Students' Perspectives on Allies' Barriers to Preventing Sexual Assault.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2024.2323654
Heather Hensman Kettrey, Robert A Marx
{"title":"Reluctance to Make a \"Blind Faith Jump\": LGBTQ+ College Students' Perspectives on Allies' Barriers to Preventing Sexual Assault.","authors":"Heather Hensman Kettrey, Robert A Marx","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2323654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Campus sexual assault is a significant problem across the United States, and research has indicated LGBTQ+ students are at a greater risk of victimization than their straight-cisgender peers. Furthermore, LGBTQ+ students face unique barriers to help-seeking following an assault, including fear of stigmatizing the LGBTQ+ community. We propose that straight-cisgender allies may act as vigilant bystanders who notice signs of sexual assault and offer assistance to prevent assault from happening to LGBTQ+ students and/or to offer support after an assault occurs. Yet, research on the role of bystanders in preventing and alleviating sexual assault has largely overlooked experiences and perspectives of LGBTQ+ students. In this study, we explored LGBTQ+ students' perceptions of the roles straight-cisgender allies may play in alleviating the problem of sexual assault of LGBTQ+ students. We conducted group interviews with 30 LGBTQ+ college students from 19 campuses across the United States, paying attention to what they perceived as barriers to allies' help. Findings illustrate ways that boundaries between LGBTQ+ insiders and outsiders can leave both groups reluctant to make a \"blind faith jump\" to seek or offer help. We propose suggestions for how sexual assault prevention programming may bridge this gap between LGBTQ+ students and straight-cisgender allies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"263-275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2323654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Campus sexual assault is a significant problem across the United States, and research has indicated LGBTQ+ students are at a greater risk of victimization than their straight-cisgender peers. Furthermore, LGBTQ+ students face unique barriers to help-seeking following an assault, including fear of stigmatizing the LGBTQ+ community. We propose that straight-cisgender allies may act as vigilant bystanders who notice signs of sexual assault and offer assistance to prevent assault from happening to LGBTQ+ students and/or to offer support after an assault occurs. Yet, research on the role of bystanders in preventing and alleviating sexual assault has largely overlooked experiences and perspectives of LGBTQ+ students. In this study, we explored LGBTQ+ students' perceptions of the roles straight-cisgender allies may play in alleviating the problem of sexual assault of LGBTQ+ students. We conducted group interviews with 30 LGBTQ+ college students from 19 campuses across the United States, paying attention to what they perceived as barriers to allies' help. Findings illustrate ways that boundaries between LGBTQ+ insiders and outsiders can leave both groups reluctant to make a "blind faith jump" to seek or offer help. We propose suggestions for how sexual assault prevention programming may bridge this gap between LGBTQ+ students and straight-cisgender allies.

不愿 "盲目相信":LGBTQ+ 大学生对盟友预防性侵犯障碍的看法》(LGBTQ+ College Students' Perspectives on Allies' Barriers to Preventing Sexual Assault)。
校园性侵犯是全美范围内的一个重大问题,研究表明,LGBTQ+ 学生比异性恋、双性恋和变性学生受害的风险更大。此外,LGBTQ+ 学生在遭受性侵犯后寻求帮助时面临着独特的障碍,包括害怕 LGBTQ+ 群体被污名化。我们建议,异性同盟可以充当警惕的旁观者,他们会注意到性侵犯的迹象并提供帮助,以防止 LGBTQ+ 学生遭受侵犯和/或在侵犯发生后提供支持。然而,关于旁观者在预防和缓解性侵犯中的作用的研究在很大程度上忽视了 LGBTQ+ 学生的经验和观点。在本研究中,我们探讨了 LGBTQ+ 学生对异性恋-顺性别同盟在缓解 LGBTQ+ 学生性侵犯问题中可能扮演的角色的看法。我们对来自美国 19 所校园的 30 名 LGBTQ+ 大学生进行了小组访谈,关注他们认为盟友提供帮助的障碍。研究结果表明,LGBTQ+ 圈内人和圈外人之间的界限会让这两个群体都不愿意 "盲目相信 "去寻求或提供帮助。我们就性侵犯预防计划如何弥合 LGBTQ+ 学生与异性恋同盟之间的这一鸿沟提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信