Discrepancies in staging and perioperative classification of pelvic endometriosis according to #Enzian 2021.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Katarína Križanová, Radek Chvátal, Viktor Križan, Maria Shibaeva, Robert Hudeček
{"title":"Discrepancies in staging and perioperative classification of pelvic endometriosis according to #Enzian 2021.","authors":"Katarína Križanová, Radek Chvátal, Viktor Križan, Maria Shibaeva, Robert Hudeček","doi":"10.48095/cccg202416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the extent of ovarian endometriosis diagnosed at preoperative staging with subsequent perioperative findings. Definition of discrepancies observed according to the #Enzian 2021 classification.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The cohort includes 62 patients of reproductive age with preoperative findings of ovarian endometrioma. Patients were divided according to the #Enzian 2021 classification into subgroups (O1, O2 + O3) with unilateral and bilateral findings. The percentage concordance of preoperative and perioperative findings was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the evaluation of ovarian involvement, the preoperative ultrasound diagnosis shows almost 100% agreement with the findings on the ovaries during surgery. Periadnexal adhesions were predicted preoperatively in only half of the cases. The difference in laterality was confirmed with T3 involvement in the O2 + O3 subgroup. In the bilateral involvement, the finding of the presence of grade 3 adhesions was doubled. An association of ovarian form of endometriosis (O2-O3) with deep infiltrating endometriosis of the small pelvis was observed in 50% of the cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ovarian form of endometriosis is associated with the occurrence of other endometriosis lesions in the small pelvis. In this study, it was confirmed that preoperative staging underestimates the extent of endometriosis in the small pelvis. In the surgical management of ovarian endometriosis, extensive adhesive process should be expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"89 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg202416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the extent of ovarian endometriosis diagnosed at preoperative staging with subsequent perioperative findings. Definition of discrepancies observed according to the #Enzian 2021 classification.

Material and methods: The cohort includes 62 patients of reproductive age with preoperative findings of ovarian endometrioma. Patients were divided according to the #Enzian 2021 classification into subgroups (O1, O2 + O3) with unilateral and bilateral findings. The percentage concordance of preoperative and perioperative findings was evaluated.

Results: In the evaluation of ovarian involvement, the preoperative ultrasound diagnosis shows almost 100% agreement with the findings on the ovaries during surgery. Periadnexal adhesions were predicted preoperatively in only half of the cases. The difference in laterality was confirmed with T3 involvement in the O2 + O3 subgroup. In the bilateral involvement, the finding of the presence of grade 3 adhesions was doubled. An association of ovarian form of endometriosis (O2-O3) with deep infiltrating endometriosis of the small pelvis was observed in 50% of the cohort.

Conclusion: The ovarian form of endometriosis is associated with the occurrence of other endometriosis lesions in the small pelvis. In this study, it was confirmed that preoperative staging underestimates the extent of endometriosis in the small pelvis. In the surgical management of ovarian endometriosis, extensive adhesive process should be expected.

根据#Enzian 2021,盆腔子宫内膜异位症的分期和围手术期分类存在差异。
目的:本研究旨在比较术前分期诊断的卵巢子宫内膜异位症程度与随后的围手术期结果。根据#Enzian 2021分类法对观察到的差异进行定义:研究对象包括62名术前发现卵巢子宫内膜异位症的育龄患者。根据#Enzian 2021分类法将患者分为单侧和双侧发现的亚组(O1、O2 + O3)。评估了术前和围手术期发现的一致性百分比:结果:在评估卵巢受累情况时,术前超声诊断与术中卵巢检查结果几乎100%吻合。只有一半的病例在术前预测到了附件周围粘连。在 O2 + O3 亚组中,T3 受累证实了侧位的差异。在双侧受累的病例中,3 级粘连的发现率增加了一倍。50%的病例发现卵巢型子宫内膜异位症(O2-O3)与小盆腔深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症有关:结论:卵巢型子宫内膜异位症与小盆腔其他子宫内膜异位症病变的发生有关。本研究证实,术前分期低估了小盆腔子宫内膜异位症的范围。在卵巢子宫内膜异位症的手术治疗中,应预计到广泛的粘连过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信