Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1177/15589447241233764
Logan M Hansen, Eric X Jiang, Noah M Hodson, Nicholas Livingston, Ani Kazanjian, Mitchell Wu, Charles S Day
{"title":"Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release.","authors":"Logan M Hansen, Eric X Jiang, Noah M Hodson, Nicholas Livingston, Ani Kazanjian, Mitchell Wu, Charles S Day","doi":"10.1177/15589447241233764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients with and without double crush syndrome (DCS), defined as concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy at C5-T1 on preoperative nerve conduction studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with preoperative nerve conduction studies who underwent unilateral, isolated CTR were retrospectively identified. All patients completed preoperative and 3-month postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and responded to the anchor question: \"Since your treatment, how would you rate your overall function?\" (much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, improved, much improved). Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in scores for UE, PI, and QuickDASH were compared, as were the anchor question responses and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients with DCS and 115 patients with CTS only were included. At 3- to 4-month follow-up, absolute and change in UE, PI, and QuickDASH scores were not statistically different between patients with DCS and CTS. Rates of anchor question response and MCID achievement were comparable for patients with CTS only and DCS on each questionnaire. The MCID achievement ranged from 48.4% to 68.8% in the unmatched cohort and 48.4% to 60% in the matched group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 3 to 4 months, patients with DCS experience similar patient-reported symptomatic and functional improvement, and achieve MCID of outcome measures at comparable rates to patients with CTS only. For patients with nerve compression at the carpal tunnel and cervical spine, CTR is a reasonable first step prior to proceeding with cervical spine decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"549-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241233764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients with and without double crush syndrome (DCS), defined as concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy at C5-T1 on preoperative nerve conduction studies.

Methods: Patients with preoperative nerve conduction studies who underwent unilateral, isolated CTR were retrospectively identified. All patients completed preoperative and 3-month postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and responded to the anchor question: "Since your treatment, how would you rate your overall function?" (much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, improved, much improved). Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in scores for UE, PI, and QuickDASH were compared, as were the anchor question responses and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Results: Sixty-three patients with DCS and 115 patients with CTS only were included. At 3- to 4-month follow-up, absolute and change in UE, PI, and QuickDASH scores were not statistically different between patients with DCS and CTS. Rates of anchor question response and MCID achievement were comparable for patients with CTS only and DCS on each questionnaire. The MCID achievement ranged from 48.4% to 68.8% in the unmatched cohort and 48.4% to 60% in the matched group.

Conclusions: At 3 to 4 months, patients with DCS experience similar patient-reported symptomatic and functional improvement, and achieve MCID of outcome measures at comparable rates to patients with CTS only. For patients with nerve compression at the carpal tunnel and cervical spine, CTR is a reasonable first step prior to proceeding with cervical spine decompression.

腕管松解术后,患有和未患有双重挤压综合征的患者临床症状改善率相似。
背景:本研究的目的是比较腕管松解术(CTR)对患有和未患有双重挤压综合征(DCS)患者的治疗效果:对术前进行神经传导检查并接受单侧孤立 CTR 的患者进行回顾性鉴定。所有患者均完成了术前和术后 3 个月的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢(UE)和疼痛干扰(PI)以及手臂、肩部和手部残疾(QuickDASH)问卷调查,并回答了锚定问题:"自治疗以来,您如何评价自己的总体功能?(严重恶化、恶化、轻微恶化、无变化、轻微改善、改善、严重改善)。比较了术前、术后和 UE、PI 和 QuickDASH 评分的变化,以及锚定问题的回答和达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的比率:共纳入 63 名 DCS 患者和 115 名仅患有 CTS 的患者。在 3 至 4 个月的随访中,DCS 和 CTS 患者的 UE、PI 和 QuickDASH 评分的绝对值和变化没有统计学差异。仅患有 CTS 的患者和患有 DCS 的患者在每份问卷上的锚点问题回答率和 MCID 达标率相当。未配对组的 MCID 达标率为 48.4% 至 68.8%,配对组为 48.4% 至 60%:结论:3至4个月后,DCS患者的症状和功能改善情况与患者自述相似,其结果测量的MCID达标率与单纯CTS患者相当。对于腕管和颈椎神经受压的患者来说,在进行颈椎减压之前,CTR是合理的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信