Survival and Quality of Life After Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases: Final Results From the Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial SCANDIUM.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006255
Roger Olofsson Bagge, Axel Nelson, Amir Shafazand, Charlotta All-Eriksson, Christian Cahlin, Nils Elander, Anders Gustavsson, Hildur Helgadottir, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Sara Kinhult, Ingrid Ljuslinder, Jan Mattsson, Magnus Rizell, Malin Sternby Eilard, Gustav J Ullenhag, Jonas A Nilsson, Lars Ny, Per Lindnér
{"title":"Survival and Quality of Life After Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases: Final Results From the Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial SCANDIUM.","authors":"Roger Olofsson Bagge, Axel Nelson, Amir Shafazand, Charlotta All-Eriksson, Christian Cahlin, Nils Elander, Anders Gustavsson, Hildur Helgadottir, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Sara Kinhult, Ingrid Ljuslinder, Jan Mattsson, Magnus Rizell, Malin Sternby Eilard, Gustav J Ullenhag, Jonas A Nilsson, Lars Ny, Per Lindnér","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of first-line isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) compared to best alternative care for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately half of the patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease, most commonly in the liver, and systemic treatment options are limited. IHP is a locoregional therapy with high response rates but with an unclear effect on OS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase III randomized controlled multicenter trial (the SCANDIUM trial), patients with previously untreated isolated uveal melanoma liver metastases were included between 2013 and 2021, with at least 24 months of follow-up. The planned accrual was 90 patients randomized 1:1 to receive a one-time treatment with IHP or best alternative care. Crossover to IHP was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the 24-month OS rate, with the hypothesis of a treatment effect leading to a 50% OS rate in the IHP group compared to 20% in the control group. HRQOL was measured by the EuroQol 5-domains 3-levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intention-to-treat population included 87 patients randomized to the IHP group [43 patients; 41 (89%) received IHP] or the control group (44 patients). The control group received chemotherapy (49%), immunotherapy (39%), or localized interventions (9%). In the intention-to-treat population, the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months in the IHP group compared with 3.3 months in the control group, with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.36). The 24-month OS rate was 46.5% in the IHP group versus 29.5% in the control group ( P =0.12). The median OS was 21.7 months versus 17.6 months, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.37-1.10). EQ-5D-3L showed a sustained high health status for the IHP group over 12 months, compared to a deteriorating trend in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma, IHP offers high response rates translating to a benefit in progression-free survival including a trend of better HRQOL compared to the control group. However, the primary endpoint of OS at 24 months was not met.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of first-line isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) compared to best alternative care for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases.

Background: Approximately half of the patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease, most commonly in the liver, and systemic treatment options are limited. IHP is a locoregional therapy with high response rates but with an unclear effect on OS.

Methods: In this phase III randomized controlled multicenter trial (the SCANDIUM trial), patients with previously untreated isolated uveal melanoma liver metastases were included between 2013 and 2021, with at least 24 months of follow-up. The planned accrual was 90 patients randomized 1:1 to receive a one-time treatment with IHP or best alternative care. Crossover to IHP was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the 24-month OS rate, with the hypothesis of a treatment effect leading to a 50% OS rate in the IHP group compared to 20% in the control group. HRQOL was measured by the EuroQol 5-domains 3-levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire over 12 months.

Results: The intention-to-treat population included 87 patients randomized to the IHP group [43 patients; 41 (89%) received IHP] or the control group (44 patients). The control group received chemotherapy (49%), immunotherapy (39%), or localized interventions (9%). In the intention-to-treat population, the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months in the IHP group compared with 3.3 months in the control group, with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.36). The 24-month OS rate was 46.5% in the IHP group versus 29.5% in the control group ( P =0.12). The median OS was 21.7 months versus 17.6 months, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.37-1.10). EQ-5D-3L showed a sustained high health status for the IHP group over 12 months, compared to a deteriorating trend in the control group.

Conclusions: For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma, IHP offers high response rates translating to a benefit in progression-free survival including a trend of better HRQOL compared to the control group. However, the primary endpoint of OS at 24 months was not met.

用美法仑隔离肝灌注治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤肝转移后的生存期和生活质量 - SCANDIUM III 期随机对照试验的最终结果。
目的研究葡萄膜黑色素瘤肝转移患者一线离体肝灌注(IHP)与最佳替代治疗(BAC)相比的总生存期(OS)和健康相关生活质量(HRQOL):约有一半的葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者会出现转移性疾病,最常见的是肝转移,而全身治疗方案有限。孤立肝灌注(IHP)是一种局部治疗方法,反应率高,但对总生存期(OS)的影响不明确:在这项 III 期随机对照多中心试验(SCANDIUM 试验)中,纳入了 2013-2021 年间既往未经治疗的孤立性葡萄膜黑色素瘤肝转移患者,随访时间至少 24 个月。计划招募 90 名患者,按 1:1 随机分配,接受 IHP 或 BAC 的一次性治疗。不允许交叉使用 IHP。主要终点是24个月的OS率,假设治疗效果导致IHP组的OS率为50%,而对照组为20%。12个月内的HRQOL通过EuroQol 5-domains3-levels(EQ-5D-3L)问卷进行测量:意向治疗(ITT)人群包括87名患者,他们被随机分配到IHP组(43名患者;41名[89%]接受了IHP治疗)或对照组(44名患者)。对照组接受化疗(49%)、免疫疗法(39%)或局部干预(9%)。在ITT人群中,IHP组的中位PFS为7.4个月,对照组为3.3个月,危险比为0.21(95% CI,0.12-0.36)。IHP组的24个月OS率为46.5%,对照组为29.5%(P=0.12)。中位OS为21.7个月对17.6个月,危险比为0.64(95% CI,0.37-1.10)。EQ-5D-3L显示,IHP组的健康状况在12个月内持续保持在较高水平,而对照组的健康状况呈恶化趋势:结论:对于葡萄膜黑色素瘤肝转移患者,IHP可提供较高的反应率,从而使患者在PFS方面获益,包括与对照组相比,患者的HRQOL呈改善趋势。然而,24个月的OS这一主要终点并未达到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信