A Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Aesthetic Outcomes of Oncoplasty vs. Simple Closure and 1- vs. 2-cm Excision Margin for Early Breast Cancer
Shivangi Saha, Dhritiman Maitra, Maneesh Singhal, Seenu Vuthaluru, Anita Dhar, Piyush Mishra, Smriti Hari, Kamal Kataria, Anurag Srivastava, R. M. Pandey
{"title":"A Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Aesthetic Outcomes of Oncoplasty vs. Simple Closure and 1- vs. 2-cm Excision Margin for Early Breast Cancer","authors":"Shivangi Saha, Dhritiman Maitra, Maneesh Singhal, Seenu Vuthaluru, Anita Dhar, Piyush Mishra, Smriti Hari, Kamal Kataria, Anurag Srivastava, R. M. Pandey","doi":"10.1007/s12262-024-04043-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Breast conservation surgery is the standard of care for patients with early breast cancer. Although most surgeons perform oncoplasty for closure of defect, there is no randomised evidence for its favour as compared to simple closure of breast defect. We compared the cosmetic outcomes of patients treated by oncoplasty versus simple closure with 1-cm vs. 2-cm margin of excision. One hundred and four patients with breast cancer were randomised to four groups: excision with 1-cm margin with simple closure or excision with 2-cm margin with simple closure; excision with 1-cm margin and oncoplasty; and excision with 2-cm margin oncoplasty. Fifty-two patients underwent oncoplasty and 52 patients had simple closure of breast defect. There was no significant difference in the cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing oncoplasty compared to simple closure. Excision with 2-cm margin compared to 1 cm did not worsen the cosmetic outcome. The margin positivity and re-excision rates were higher with 1-cm margin and oncoplastic closure group (<i>p</i>-value 0.018). There was no significant difference in complications between oncoplasty compared to simple closure, and 1-cm vs. 2-cm margin of excision. Simple closure demonstrated similar cosmesis as compared to oncoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":13391,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04043-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Breast conservation surgery is the standard of care for patients with early breast cancer. Although most surgeons perform oncoplasty for closure of defect, there is no randomised evidence for its favour as compared to simple closure of breast defect. We compared the cosmetic outcomes of patients treated by oncoplasty versus simple closure with 1-cm vs. 2-cm margin of excision. One hundred and four patients with breast cancer were randomised to four groups: excision with 1-cm margin with simple closure or excision with 2-cm margin with simple closure; excision with 1-cm margin and oncoplasty; and excision with 2-cm margin oncoplasty. Fifty-two patients underwent oncoplasty and 52 patients had simple closure of breast defect. There was no significant difference in the cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing oncoplasty compared to simple closure. Excision with 2-cm margin compared to 1 cm did not worsen the cosmetic outcome. The margin positivity and re-excision rates were higher with 1-cm margin and oncoplastic closure group (p-value 0.018). There was no significant difference in complications between oncoplasty compared to simple closure, and 1-cm vs. 2-cm margin of excision. Simple closure demonstrated similar cosmesis as compared to oncoplasty.
期刊介绍：
The Indian Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India that considers for publication articles in all fields of surgery. Issues are published bimonthly in the months of February, April, June, August, October and December.
The journal publishes Original article, Point of technique, Review article, Case report, Letter to editor, Teachers and surgeons from the past - A short (up to 500 words) bio sketch of a revered teacher or surgeon whom you hold in esteem and Images in surgery, surgical pathology, and surgical radiology.
A trusted resource for peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery
Provides a forum for surgeons in India and abroad to exchange ideas and advance the art of surgery
The official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India
92% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again
The Indian Journal of Surgery offers peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery. The Journal publishes Original articles, Points of technique, Review articles, Case reports, Letters, Images and brief biographies of influential teachers and surgeons.
The Journal spans General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Rural Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, Surgical Oncology, Radiology, Anaesthesia, Trauma Services, Minimal Access Surgery, Endocrine Surgery, GI Surgery, ENT, Colorectal Surgery, surgical practice and research.
The Journal provides a forum for surgeons from India and abroad to exchange ideas, to propagate the advancement of science and the art of surgery and to promote friendship among surgeons in India and abroad. This has been a trusted platform for surgons in communicating up-to-date scientific informeation to the community.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
