Should the Title of Talents Be Necessary? A Study on the “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” Mechanism

Q2 Decision Sciences
Yi He;Linlin Ma;Wentao Zhang
{"title":"Should the Title of Talents Be Necessary? A Study on the “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” Mechanism","authors":"Yi He;Linlin Ma;Wentao Zhang","doi":"10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve the efficiency of scientific research and innovation, China is accelerating the exploration and implementation of the “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” mechanism. How to identify and select the high-level research teams and project leaders who are capable to make breakthroughs in core technologies is the key challenge of this new type of talents selection mechanism. Recent practical experience has shown that most of the research project leaders selected by this mechanism have one or more titles of talents. This paper aims at exploring whether the title of talents can fully reflect the research ability and team leadership of the scholars and then become necessary for selecting the best candidates. Based on a sample of selected project leaders, the empirical results show that although the title of talents facilitates the scholars to win honor and awards, the title of talents has no significant effects on their research achievements in terms of the quantity of academic papers, books, and projects, and also it is not related to their research leadership. Our findings provide policy implications that the title of talents should play a limited role in the “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” mechanism.","PeriodicalId":32381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Crowd Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10445694","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Crowd Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10445694/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to improve the efficiency of scientific research and innovation, China is accelerating the exploration and implementation of the “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” mechanism. How to identify and select the high-level research teams and project leaders who are capable to make breakthroughs in core technologies is the key challenge of this new type of talents selection mechanism. Recent practical experience has shown that most of the research project leaders selected by this mechanism have one or more titles of talents. This paper aims at exploring whether the title of talents can fully reflect the research ability and team leadership of the scholars and then become necessary for selecting the best candidates. Based on a sample of selected project leaders, the empirical results show that although the title of talents facilitates the scholars to win honor and awards, the title of talents has no significant effects on their research achievements in terms of the quantity of academic papers, books, and projects, and also it is not related to their research leadership. Our findings provide policy implications that the title of talents should play a limited role in the “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” mechanism.
人才职称是否必要?公开竞聘择优 "机制研究
为提高科研创新效率,我国正在加快探索实施 "公开竞聘择优 "机制。如何发现和选拔能够突破核心技术的高水平科研团队和项目负责人,是这一新型人才选拔机制面临的关键挑战。近期的实践经验表明,该机制选拔出的科研项目负责人大多具有一个或多个人才称号。本文旨在探讨人才称号能否充分体现学者的科研能力和团队领导力,进而成为选拔优秀人才的必要条件。基于选取的项目负责人样本,实证结果表明,虽然人才称号有利于学者获得荣誉和奖励,但人才称号对其学术论文、著作和项目数量等科研成果的影响并不显著,也与其科研领导力无关。我们的研究结果提供了政策启示,即人才职称在 "公开竞聘择优 "机制中应发挥有限的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Crowd Science
International Journal of Crowd Science Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书