Gender Differences in the Predictive Value of Obesity Indices for Insulin Resistance in Adult Mexican Individuals.

Elizalde-Barrera Cesar Ivan, Estrada-Garcia Teresa, Lopez-Saucedo Catalina, Rubio-Guerra Alberto Francisco, Ramirez-Velasco Diana Elena
{"title":"Gender Differences in the Predictive Value of Obesity Indices for Insulin Resistance in Adult Mexican Individuals.","authors":"Elizalde-Barrera Cesar Ivan, Estrada-Garcia Teresa, Lopez-Saucedo Catalina, Rubio-Guerra Alberto Francisco, Ramirez-Velasco Diana Elena","doi":"10.2174/0118715303284893240215070923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity-linked insulin resistance (IR) is an important risk factor for metabolic diseases, and anthropometric indices are commonly used for risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to assess possible differences between women and men in the predictive value and association of nine obesity indices with IR, as assessed by HOMA-IR, in a nondiabetic adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study included individuals recruited from a hospital in Mexico City. Indices evaluated were waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, visceral adiposity index, body adiposity index (BAI), relative fat mass (RFM), and conicity index (CI). Fasting plasma glucose and insulin were measured to calculate HOMA-IR. Correlation analysis was performed between obesity indices and HOMA-IR. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were performed to determine predictive accuracy and cut-off values of obesity indices for IR. A binary logistic regression (BLR) analysis with OR calculation was performed to determine the strength of association with HOMA-IR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 378 individuals (59% females, mean age 46.38 ±12.25 years). The highest Pearson coefficient value was observed for BMI among women, while among men, the highest values were found for BMI and BAI. WC among women, and BAI and RFM among men showed the highest sensitivity, while the highest specificity was observed for WHR among women and WC among men with respect to insulin prediction. In the adjusted BLR model, BMI, WC, and WHR among women and WC and RFM and BAI among men were independently associated with IR, showing the highest odds ratio (OR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Mexican adults, WC, WHR, RFM and BAI could be complementary tools for BMI in screening for IR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94316,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":"1640-1650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303284893240215070923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity-linked insulin resistance (IR) is an important risk factor for metabolic diseases, and anthropometric indices are commonly used for risk assessment.

Aim: The study aimed to assess possible differences between women and men in the predictive value and association of nine obesity indices with IR, as assessed by HOMA-IR, in a nondiabetic adult population.

Methods: The cross-sectional study included individuals recruited from a hospital in Mexico City. Indices evaluated were waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, visceral adiposity index, body adiposity index (BAI), relative fat mass (RFM), and conicity index (CI). Fasting plasma glucose and insulin were measured to calculate HOMA-IR. Correlation analysis was performed between obesity indices and HOMA-IR. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were performed to determine predictive accuracy and cut-off values of obesity indices for IR. A binary logistic regression (BLR) analysis with OR calculation was performed to determine the strength of association with HOMA-IR.

Results: We included 378 individuals (59% females, mean age 46.38 ±12.25 years). The highest Pearson coefficient value was observed for BMI among women, while among men, the highest values were found for BMI and BAI. WC among women, and BAI and RFM among men showed the highest sensitivity, while the highest specificity was observed for WHR among women and WC among men with respect to insulin prediction. In the adjusted BLR model, BMI, WC, and WHR among women and WC and RFM and BAI among men were independently associated with IR, showing the highest odds ratio (OR).

Conclusion: In Mexican adults, WC, WHR, RFM and BAI could be complementary tools for BMI in screening for IR.

墨西哥成年人肥胖指数对胰岛素抵抗预测价值的性别差异。
背景:目的:该研究旨在评估在非糖尿病成年人群中,九项肥胖指数与胰岛素抵抗(IR)的预测价值和关联性(通过 HOMA-IR 评估)在男女之间可能存在的差异:这项横断面研究的对象来自墨西哥城的一家医院。评估指标包括腰围 (WC)、臀围 (HC)、体重指数 (BMI)、腰臀比、腰高比、内脏脂肪指数、体脂肪指数 (BAI)、相对脂肪量 (RFM) 和圆锥指数 (CI)。测量空腹血糖和胰岛素以计算 HOMA-IR。肥胖指数与 HOMA-IR 之间进行了相关性分析。为确定肥胖指数对 IR 的预测准确性和临界值,进行了接收者操作特征曲线分析。通过计算OR进行二元逻辑回归(BLR)分析,以确定与HOMA-IR的关联强度:我们共纳入了 378 人(59% 为女性,平均年龄为 46.38 ±12.25 岁)。在女性中,BMI 的皮尔逊系数值最高,而在男性中,BMI 和 BAI 的皮尔逊系数值最高。在胰岛素预测方面,女性的 WC、男性的 BAI 和 RFM 显示出最高的灵敏度,而女性的 WHR 和男性的 WC 则显示出最高的特异性。在调整后的 BLR 模型中,女性的 BMI、WC 和 WHR 以及男性的 WC、RFM 和 BAI 与 IR 独立相关,显示出最高的几率比(OR):结论:在墨西哥成年人中,WC、WHR、RFM 和 BAI 可以作为 BMI 的补充工具来筛查 IR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信