Impact of temperature on the magnitude and duration of relief after lumbar facets medial branch nerves radiofrequency ablation: a randomized double-blinded study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nagy Mekhail, Shrif Costandi, Sherif Armanyous, Erin Templeton, Lou-Anne G Acevedo-Moreno, Nicholas Prayson
{"title":"Impact of temperature on the magnitude and duration of relief after lumbar facets medial branch nerves radiofrequency ablation: a randomized double-blinded study.","authors":"Nagy Mekhail, Shrif Costandi, Sherif Armanyous, Erin Templeton, Lou-Anne G Acevedo-Moreno, Nicholas Prayson","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are numerous studies appraising the variables that may influence the clinical outcomes after lumbar thermal radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Expanding the lesion size may increase the likelihood of capturing the target nerves in the lesion, thereby increasing the technical success rate of RFA. However, our literature search has failed to identify a consensus on the optimal target temperature. A retrospective study demonstrated that there seems to be significant functional improvement associated with the temperature of 90°C compared with 80°C. The authors prospectively studied the subject in a double-blinded randomized fashion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing RFA for lumbar facetogenic pain were randomized in two cohorts (80°C and 90°C). Physicians and patients were blinded to the temperature used. The primary outcome was self-reported pain scores up to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included: self-reported functional improvement, duration of relief as measured by the time before repeat ablation of the same medial branches nerves, opioids' consumption, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups reported pain improvement in all follow-up time points. Overall, both groups achieved statistically significant pain reduction (p<0.05). The median time to repeat RFA in the 80°C group was 112 (49-252) days, while it was 217 (198-348) days in the 90°C group (p<0.04). The univariate analysis emphasized that the RFA temperature is a statistically significant factor for pain improvement of more than 50%, OR 2.7 (1.1 to 6.6) p value=0.031.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFA has been demonstrated as an effective therapeutic modality for lumbar facetogenic back pain. Yet, the several factors involved in determining a favorable outcome of this procedure require further research and optimization. This prospective double-blinded randomized trial demonstrated that RFA at both temperatures (80°C, 90°C) provided significance at all the time periods examined. However, RFA at 90°C was superior to 80°C in regard to the duration of relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are numerous studies appraising the variables that may influence the clinical outcomes after lumbar thermal radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Expanding the lesion size may increase the likelihood of capturing the target nerves in the lesion, thereby increasing the technical success rate of RFA. However, our literature search has failed to identify a consensus on the optimal target temperature. A retrospective study demonstrated that there seems to be significant functional improvement associated with the temperature of 90°C compared with 80°C. The authors prospectively studied the subject in a double-blinded randomized fashion.

Methods: Patients undergoing RFA for lumbar facetogenic pain were randomized in two cohorts (80°C and 90°C). Physicians and patients were blinded to the temperature used. The primary outcome was self-reported pain scores up to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included: self-reported functional improvement, duration of relief as measured by the time before repeat ablation of the same medial branches nerves, opioids' consumption, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Both groups reported pain improvement in all follow-up time points. Overall, both groups achieved statistically significant pain reduction (p<0.05). The median time to repeat RFA in the 80°C group was 112 (49-252) days, while it was 217 (198-348) days in the 90°C group (p<0.04). The univariate analysis emphasized that the RFA temperature is a statistically significant factor for pain improvement of more than 50%, OR 2.7 (1.1 to 6.6) p value=0.031.

Conclusion: RFA has been demonstrated as an effective therapeutic modality for lumbar facetogenic back pain. Yet, the several factors involved in determining a favorable outcome of this procedure require further research and optimization. This prospective double-blinded randomized trial demonstrated that RFA at both temperatures (80°C, 90°C) provided significance at all the time periods examined. However, RFA at 90°C was superior to 80°C in regard to the duration of relief.

温度对腰椎面内侧支神经射频消融术后缓解程度和持续时间的影响:一项随机双盲研究。
导言:有许多研究对可能影响腰椎热射频消融术(RFA)临床疗效的变量进行了评估。扩大病灶大小可增加捕获病灶中靶神经的可能性,从而提高 RFA 的技术成功率。然而,我们的文献检索未能就最佳目标温度达成共识。一项回顾性研究表明,与 80°C 相比,90°C 的温度似乎能显著改善功能。作者以双盲随机方式对研究对象进行了前瞻性研究:方法:因腰椎面源性疼痛而接受射频消融术的患者被随机分为两组(80°C 和 90°C)。医生和患者对所使用的温度均为盲法。主要结果是12个月内自我报告的疼痛评分。次要结果包括:自我报告的功能改善情况、以同一内侧支神经重复消融前的时间来衡量的缓解持续时间、阿片类药物的消耗量以及患者满意度:两组患者在所有随访时间点均报告疼痛有所改善。结果:两组患者在所有随访时间点均报告疼痛有所改善,总体而言,两组患者的疼痛均有明显减轻(p):RFA已被证明是治疗腰椎面源性背痛的有效方法。然而,决定该疗法能否取得良好疗效的几个因素还需要进一步研究和优化。这项前瞻性双盲随机试验表明,两种温度(80°C、90°C)下的射频消融术在所有检查时间段内均有显著疗效。不过,就缓解的持续时间而言,90°C 的射频消融术优于 80°C。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信