Deployed Combat Use of Methoxyflurane for Analgesia.

Q3 Medicine
Steven Gremel Schauer, Andrew D Fisher, Michael D April
{"title":"Deployed Combat Use of Methoxyflurane for Analgesia.","authors":"Steven Gremel Schauer, Andrew D Fisher, Michael D April","doi":"10.55460/X2OD-UYUQ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The U.S. Military needs fast-acting, non-opioid solutions for battlefield pain. The U.S. Military recently used morphine auto-injectors, which are now unavailable. Off-label ketamine and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate use introduces challenges and is therefore uncommon among conventional forces. Sublingual suftentanil is the only recent pain medication acquired to fill this gap. Conversely, methoxyflurane delivered by a handheld inhaler is promising, fast-acting, and available to some partner forces. We describe methoxyflurane use reported in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We requested all available DODTR encounters from 2007 to 2023 with a documented intervention or assessment within the first 72 hours of care. We analyzed casualties who received methoxyflurane in the prehospital setting using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 22 encounters with documented methoxyflurane administration. The median patient age was 23 (range 21-31) years. All were men. The largest proportion was partner force (50%), followed by U.S. Military (27%). Most (64%) sustained battle injuries. Explosives were the most common mechanism of injury (46%), followed by firearms (23%). The median injury severity score was 5 (range 1-17). The most frequent injuries were serious injuries to the extremities (27%), and 23% of patients (5) received a tourniquet. One-half of the casualties received concomitant pain medications. Only three casualties had multiple pain scores measured, with a median pain score change of -3 on a scale of 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methoxyflurane use in deployed combat shows both feasibility and usability for analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/X2OD-UYUQ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The U.S. Military needs fast-acting, non-opioid solutions for battlefield pain. The U.S. Military recently used morphine auto-injectors, which are now unavailable. Off-label ketamine and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate use introduces challenges and is therefore uncommon among conventional forces. Sublingual suftentanil is the only recent pain medication acquired to fill this gap. Conversely, methoxyflurane delivered by a handheld inhaler is promising, fast-acting, and available to some partner forces. We describe methoxyflurane use reported in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR).

Methods: We requested all available DODTR encounters from 2007 to 2023 with a documented intervention or assessment within the first 72 hours of care. We analyzed casualties who received methoxyflurane in the prehospital setting using descriptive statistics.

Results: There were 22 encounters with documented methoxyflurane administration. The median patient age was 23 (range 21-31) years. All were men. The largest proportion was partner force (50%), followed by U.S. Military (27%). Most (64%) sustained battle injuries. Explosives were the most common mechanism of injury (46%), followed by firearms (23%). The median injury severity score was 5 (range 1-17). The most frequent injuries were serious injuries to the extremities (27%), and 23% of patients (5) received a tourniquet. One-half of the casualties received concomitant pain medications. Only three casualties had multiple pain scores measured, with a median pain score change of -3 on a scale of 10.

Conclusion: Methoxyflurane use in deployed combat shows both feasibility and usability for analgesia.

在部署的战斗中使用甲氧基氟烷镇痛。
背景:美国军方需要快速起效、非阿片类药物的战场止痛解决方案。美军最近使用了吗啡自动注射器,但现在已经无法使用。标签外使用氯胺酮和枸橼酸芬太尼口服液会带来挑战,因此在常规部队中并不常见。舌下含服舒芬太尼是最近获得的唯一一种止痛药物,填补了这一空白。相反,通过手持吸入器给药的甲氧氟烷前景广阔、见效快,一些伙伴部队也可以使用。我们描述了国防部创伤登记处(DODTR)报告的甲氧氟烷使用情况:我们申请了 2007 年至 2023 年期间所有可用的 DODTR 病例,这些病例都记录了在护理的最初 72 小时内进行的干预或评估。我们使用描述性统计方法分析了在院前环境中接受甲氧氟醚治疗的伤员:结果:共有 22 次有记录的甲氧氟烷用药。患者年龄中位数为 23 岁(21-31 岁不等)。所有患者均为男性。最大比例是伙伴部队(50%),其次是美国军队(27%)。大多数人(64%)在战斗中受伤。爆炸是最常见的受伤机制(46%),其次是枪支(23%)。受伤严重程度的中位数为 5(范围为 1-17)。最常见的伤害是四肢重伤(27%),23%的患者(5 人)接受了止血带治疗。二分之一的伤员同时服用了止痛药物。只有 3 名伤员进行了多次疼痛评分,疼痛评分变化的中位数为-3(10 分):结论:在部署的战斗中使用甲氧氟醚镇痛显示出了可行性和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信