Management and risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia in the breast: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1177/14574969241234115
Charlotta Wadsten, Gunilla Rask
{"title":"Management and risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia in the breast: A population-based retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Charlotta Wadsten, Gunilla Rask","doi":"10.1177/14574969241234115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines recommend open surgery for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the breast due to risk of underestimating malignant disease. Considering the ongoing randomized trials of active surveillance of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it seems reasonable to define a low-risk group of women with ADH where a conservative approach is appropriate. The aim here was to evaluate the management and risk for upgrade of lesions diagnosed as ADH in percutaneous breast biopsies in two Swedish hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All women with a screen-detected or symptomatic breast lesion breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 2-4 and a percutaneous biopsy showing ADH between 2013 and 2022 at Sundsvall Hospital and Umeå University Hospital were included. Information regarding imaging, histopathology, clinical features, and management was retrieved from medical records. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for upgrade to malignant diagnosis after surgery were calculated by logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 101 women were included with a mean age 56.1 (range 36-93) years. Most women were selected from the national mammography screening program due to microcalcifications. Biopsies were performed with vacuum-assisted biopsy (60.4%) or core-needle biopsy (39.6%). Forty-eight women (47.5%) underwent surgery, of which 11 were upgraded to DCIS, and 7 to invasive breast cancer (upgrade rate 37.5%). Among the 53 women managed conservatively (median follow-up 74 months), one woman (1.9%) developed subsequent ipsilateral DCIS. The combined upgrade rate was 18.8%. No clinical variable statistically significantly correlating to risk of upgrade was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upgrade rate of 37.5% in women undergoing surgery compared to an estimated 5-year risk of ipsilateral malignancy at 1.9% in women managed conservatively indicate that non-surgical management of select women with ADH is feasible. Research should focus on defining reproducible criteria differentiating high-risk from low-risk ADH.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"229-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241234115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International guidelines recommend open surgery for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the breast due to risk of underestimating malignant disease. Considering the ongoing randomized trials of active surveillance of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it seems reasonable to define a low-risk group of women with ADH where a conservative approach is appropriate. The aim here was to evaluate the management and risk for upgrade of lesions diagnosed as ADH in percutaneous breast biopsies in two Swedish hospitals.

Methods: All women with a screen-detected or symptomatic breast lesion breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 2-4 and a percutaneous biopsy showing ADH between 2013 and 2022 at Sundsvall Hospital and Umeå University Hospital were included. Information regarding imaging, histopathology, clinical features, and management was retrieved from medical records. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for upgrade to malignant diagnosis after surgery were calculated by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Altogether, 101 women were included with a mean age 56.1 (range 36-93) years. Most women were selected from the national mammography screening program due to microcalcifications. Biopsies were performed with vacuum-assisted biopsy (60.4%) or core-needle biopsy (39.6%). Forty-eight women (47.5%) underwent surgery, of which 11 were upgraded to DCIS, and 7 to invasive breast cancer (upgrade rate 37.5%). Among the 53 women managed conservatively (median follow-up 74 months), one woman (1.9%) developed subsequent ipsilateral DCIS. The combined upgrade rate was 18.8%. No clinical variable statistically significantly correlating to risk of upgrade was identified.

Conclusions: The upgrade rate of 37.5% in women undergoing surgery compared to an estimated 5-year risk of ipsilateral malignancy at 1.9% in women managed conservatively indicate that non-surgical management of select women with ADH is feasible. Research should focus on defining reproducible criteria differentiating high-risk from low-risk ADH.

乳腺非典型导管增生的管理和升级风险:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
背景:由于存在低估恶性疾病的风险,国际指南建议对乳腺非典型导管增生(ADH)进行开放手术。考虑到目前正在进行的对低风险乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)进行积极监控的随机试验,似乎有理由定义一个低风险的 ADH 女性群体,在该群体中采取保守方法是合适的。本文旨在评估瑞典两家医院对经皮乳腺活检中诊断为 ADH 的病变的管理和升级风险:方法:纳入2013年至2022年期间在松兹瓦尔医院和于默奥大学医院筛查出或有症状的乳腺病变乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)2-4和经皮活检显示为ADH的所有女性。从病历中检索了有关影像学、组织病理学、临床特征和治疗的信息。通过逻辑回归分析计算了术后升级为恶性诊断的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI):共纳入 101 名妇女,平均年龄 56.1 岁(36-93 岁)。大多数妇女都是因微小钙化而从国家乳腺 X 射线筛查计划中被选中的。活检采用真空辅助活检(60.4%)或核心针活检(39.6%)。48 名妇女(47.5%)接受了手术,其中 11 人升级为 DCIS,7 人升级为浸润性乳腺癌(升级率为 37.5%)。在接受保守治疗的 53 名妇女中(中位随访 74 个月),有一名妇女(1.9%)随后发展为同侧 DCIS。综合升级率为 18.8%。没有发现与升级风险有明显统计学相关性的临床变量:接受手术治疗的妇女的升级率为 37.5%,而保守治疗妇女的 5 年同侧恶性肿瘤风险估计为 1.9%,这表明对部分 ADH 妇女进行非手术治疗是可行的。研究重点应放在确定区分高风险和低风险 ADH 的可重复标准上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信