Are Sandwich Vertebrae Prone to Refracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty? A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Xue-Yang Liu, Min Feng, Xiang-Long Zhang, Tao Zou, Zhi Huang, Jian-Dong Yang, Hui-Hui Sun
{"title":"Are Sandwich Vertebrae Prone to Refracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty? A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xue-Yang Liu, Min Feng, Xiang-Long Zhang, Tao Zou, Zhi Huang, Jian-Dong Yang, Hui-Hui Sun","doi":"10.14444/8577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The formation of sandwiched vertebrae (SDVs) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has become a common phenomenon. Whether SDVs are more likely to fracture is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to provide medical evidence for whether SDVs are more prone to refracture than non-SDVs (NSDVs) after PVP or PKP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in accordance with the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Weipu, were thoroughly searched for relevant studies included from any point up until June 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4052 individuals from 9 studies were enrolled. Overall, patients with SDV presented more risk to have refracture than patients with NSDV (OR = 1.57, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The incidences of refracture were comparable between the 2 cohorts in studies with a follow-up time less than 3 years (OR = 1.28, <i>P</i> = 0.49). However, patients with SDV were more prone to have refracture than patients with NSDV in studies with a follow-up time longer than 3 years (OR = 1.92, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Moreover, patients with SDV were more likely to have refracture than patients with NSDV in studies that involved both PVP and PKP (OR = 1.62, <i>P</i> = 0.002). In addition, age, low bone density, and postoperative kyphosis angle of sandwich fracture segments >10° were independent factors to predict refracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with SDV were more likely to have refracture after PVP or PKP, especially when the follow-up time was longer than 3 years.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The formation of sandwiched vertebrae (SDVs) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has become a common phenomenon. Whether SDVs are more likely to fracture is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to provide medical evidence for whether SDVs are more prone to refracture than non-SDVs (NSDVs) after PVP or PKP.

Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Weipu, were thoroughly searched for relevant studies included from any point up until June 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.4.

Results: A total of 4052 individuals from 9 studies were enrolled. Overall, patients with SDV presented more risk to have refracture than patients with NSDV (OR = 1.57, P = 0.04). The incidences of refracture were comparable between the 2 cohorts in studies with a follow-up time less than 3 years (OR = 1.28, P = 0.49). However, patients with SDV were more prone to have refracture than patients with NSDV in studies with a follow-up time longer than 3 years (OR = 1.92, P = 0.009). Moreover, patients with SDV were more likely to have refracture than patients with NSDV in studies that involved both PVP and PKP (OR = 1.62, P = 0.002). In addition, age, low bone density, and postoperative kyphosis angle of sandwich fracture segments >10° were independent factors to predict refracture.

Conclusions: Patients with SDV were more likely to have refracture after PVP or PKP, especially when the follow-up time was longer than 3 years.

Level of evidence: 3:

经皮椎体成形术或椎体后凸成形术后夹层椎体是否易发生再骨折?一项 Meta 分析。
背景:经皮椎体成形术(PVP)或经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)后形成的夹层椎体(SDVs)已成为一种常见现象。SDV 是否更容易发生骨折仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,为 PVP 或 PKP 后 SDV 是否比非 SDV(NSDV)更容易发生骨折提供医学证据:本研究按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》的标准进行。对多个数据库进行了全面检索,包括PubMed、Embase、Medline数据库、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库和维普数据库,收录了截至2022年6月的任何时间点的相关研究。使用Revman 5.4进行统计分析:9项研究共纳入4052名患者。总体而言,SDV 患者发生骨折的风险高于 NSDV 患者(OR = 1.57,P = 0.04)。在随访时间少于 3 年的研究中,两组患者的骨折发生率相当(OR = 1.28,P = 0.49)。然而,在随访时间超过 3 年的研究中,SDV 患者比 NSDV 患者更容易发生骨折(OR = 1.92,P = 0.009)。此外,在同时涉及 PVP 和 PKP 的研究中,SDV 患者比 NSDV 患者更容易发生再骨折(OR = 1.62,P = 0.002)。此外,年龄、低骨密度和术后夹层骨折节段后凸角度大于10°也是预测再骨折的独立因素:结论:SDV患者在PVP或PKP术后发生再骨折的可能性更大,尤其是随访时间超过3年时:3:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信