Outpatient and primary care direct provocation challenges for antibiotic allergy in children.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Anjum Grewal, Nicola Jay
{"title":"Outpatient and primary care direct provocation challenges for antibiotic allergy in children.","authors":"Anjum Grewal, Nicola Jay","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use of a questionnaire-based decision-making algorithm to triage children with reported antibiotic allergies to proceed directly to an oral provocation challenge.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Children aged 2-16 years attending paediatric emergency department over 1 year (1 June 2018 till 31 May 2019) or identified from four primary care centres in Sheffield with a recorded antibiotic allergy and no previous testing.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>313 children with 325 recorded antibiotic allergies.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Clinical decision-making algorithm used to either exclude, directly delabel or stratify children to oral antibiotic challenge in outpatient department or primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>To assess the safety of using the questionnaire-based algorithm for proceeding to a direct oral provocation challenge.The secondary outcomes were to look for associations and predictive factors in positive challenges and to assess parent/carer acceptability of the service by using Likert Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful contact was made with 200 children, of which 153 children could be evaluated based on inclusion criteria, engagement and availability of medical records.15 children were directly delabelled based on history and records. 138 children underwent challenges in outpatient and primary care. 6% of challenges were reactive with a mild, delayed reaction. Overall, a delabelling rate of 91% was achieved. There were no clear predictors for a positive challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our questionnaire-based algorithm for stratifying children with antibiotic allergies to proceed directly to an oral outpatient or primary care challenge was found to be safe, feasible and acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":"23-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of a questionnaire-based decision-making algorithm to triage children with reported antibiotic allergies to proceed directly to an oral provocation challenge.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: Children aged 2-16 years attending paediatric emergency department over 1 year (1 June 2018 till 31 May 2019) or identified from four primary care centres in Sheffield with a recorded antibiotic allergy and no previous testing.

Participants: 313 children with 325 recorded antibiotic allergies.

Exposure: Clinical decision-making algorithm used to either exclude, directly delabel or stratify children to oral antibiotic challenge in outpatient department or primary care practice.

Main outcome measures: To assess the safety of using the questionnaire-based algorithm for proceeding to a direct oral provocation challenge.The secondary outcomes were to look for associations and predictive factors in positive challenges and to assess parent/carer acceptability of the service by using Likert Scale.

Results: Successful contact was made with 200 children, of which 153 children could be evaluated based on inclusion criteria, engagement and availability of medical records.15 children were directly delabelled based on history and records. 138 children underwent challenges in outpatient and primary care. 6% of challenges were reactive with a mild, delayed reaction. Overall, a delabelling rate of 91% was achieved. There were no clear predictors for a positive challenge.

Conclusion: Our questionnaire-based algorithm for stratifying children with antibiotic allergies to proceed directly to an oral outpatient or primary care challenge was found to be safe, feasible and acceptable.

针对儿童抗生素过敏的门诊和初级保健直接激发挑战。
目的评估使用基于问卷的决策算法对报告抗生素过敏的儿童进行分流,以便直接进行口腔激发试验:队列研究:1年内(2018年6月1日至2019年5月31日)在儿科急诊就诊的2-16岁儿童,或从谢菲尔德的4个初级保健中心确定的有抗生素过敏记录且之前未进行过测试的儿童:313名有325次抗生素过敏记录的儿童:在门诊部或初级保健实践中,使用临床决策算法排除、直接标记或分层儿童接受口服抗生素挑战:次要结果是寻找阳性挑战中的关联和预测因素,并使用李克特量表评估家长/护理人员对服务的接受程度:成功联系了 200 名儿童,其中 153 名儿童可根据纳入标准、参与情况和医疗记录进行评估。138 名儿童在门诊和初级保健中接受了挑战。6% 的挑战反应为轻度延迟反应。总体而言,脱标率达到 91%。结论:我们基于问卷调查的算法可以帮助我们预测儿童的过敏反应:我们采用基于问卷的算法对抗生素过敏儿童进行分层,以便直接进行口腔门诊或初级保健挑战,该算法安全、可行且可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信