Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligoprogression with or without switch of systemic therapy

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jonas Willmann, Eugenia Vlaskou Badra, Selma Adilovic, Maiwand Ahmadsei, Sebastian M. Christ, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Michael Mayinger, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligoprogression with or without switch of systemic therapy","authors":"Jonas Willmann,&nbsp;Eugenia Vlaskou Badra,&nbsp;Selma Adilovic,&nbsp;Maiwand Ahmadsei,&nbsp;Sebastian M. Christ,&nbsp;Stephanie Tanadini-Lang,&nbsp;Michael Mayinger,&nbsp;Matthias Guckenberger,&nbsp;Nicolaus Andratschke","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Oligoprogression is defined as cancer progression of a limited number of metastases under active systemic therapy. The role of metastasis-directed therapy, using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is controversial as is the continuation versus switch of systemic therapy. We report outcomes of oligoprogressive patients after SBRT, and compare those patients that continued or switched their current line of systemic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Material/Methods.</h3><p>We included patients who developed up to 5 progressive extracranial metastases under systemic therapy for any solid organ malignancy and were treated with SBRT to all lesions at our institution between 01/2014 and 12/2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the interval to the next systemic therapy line determined using cumulative incidence functions. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the influence of baseline and post-progression variables on OS, PFS and survival with the next systemic therapy after SBRT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 135 patients with oligoprogressive disease of which the most common primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 46, 34.1 %), 96 continued their current line of systemic therapy after oligoprogression. Among 39 who switched systemic therapy, 28 (71.8 %) paused or discontinued, while 11 (28.2 %) immediately started another systemic treatment. After a median follow-up of 27.2 months, patients that switched and those who continued systemic therapy after oligoprogression had comparable median OS (32.1 vs. 38.2 months, p = 0.47) and PFS (4.3 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.6). The intervals to the next systemic therapy line were comparable between both cohorts (p = 0.6). An ECOG performance status of 2 and immediately starting a new systemic therapy after oligoprogression were associated with a poorer survival without next systemic therapy, while the de-novo OMD state was associated with better survival without next systemic therapy compared to the induced state.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Oncological outcomes of patients that continued or switched systemic therapy after SBRT for oligoprogression were comparable, potentially indicating that further lines of treatment may be safely delayed in selected cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000259/pdfft?md5=6a29f0a3dc0879acec2ced5a24841a9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000259-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Oligoprogression is defined as cancer progression of a limited number of metastases under active systemic therapy. The role of metastasis-directed therapy, using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is controversial as is the continuation versus switch of systemic therapy. We report outcomes of oligoprogressive patients after SBRT, and compare those patients that continued or switched their current line of systemic therapy.

Material/Methods.

We included patients who developed up to 5 progressive extracranial metastases under systemic therapy for any solid organ malignancy and were treated with SBRT to all lesions at our institution between 01/2014 and 12/2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the interval to the next systemic therapy line determined using cumulative incidence functions. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the influence of baseline and post-progression variables on OS, PFS and survival with the next systemic therapy after SBRT.

Results

Among 135 patients with oligoprogressive disease of which the most common primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 46, 34.1 %), 96 continued their current line of systemic therapy after oligoprogression. Among 39 who switched systemic therapy, 28 (71.8 %) paused or discontinued, while 11 (28.2 %) immediately started another systemic treatment. After a median follow-up of 27.2 months, patients that switched and those who continued systemic therapy after oligoprogression had comparable median OS (32.1 vs. 38.2 months, p = 0.47) and PFS (4.3 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.6). The intervals to the next systemic therapy line were comparable between both cohorts (p = 0.6). An ECOG performance status of 2 and immediately starting a new systemic therapy after oligoprogression were associated with a poorer survival without next systemic therapy, while the de-novo OMD state was associated with better survival without next systemic therapy compared to the induced state.

Conclusion

Oncological outcomes of patients that continued or switched systemic therapy after SBRT for oligoprogression were comparable, potentially indicating that further lines of treatment may be safely delayed in selected cases.

立体定向体放射疗法治疗寡核苷酸进展症,可转换或不转换全身疗法
背景转移被定义为在积极的全身治疗下数量有限的转移灶的癌症进展。使用立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)进行转移灶定向治疗的作用以及继续还是更换全身治疗方法存在争议。材料/方法:我们纳入了2014年1月至2019年12月期间,因任何实体器官恶性肿瘤在全身治疗中出现多达5个进展性颅外转移灶,并在我院接受SBRT治疗所有病灶的患者。总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)采用卡普兰-梅耶法进行分析,下一次系统治疗的间隔时间采用累积发生率函数确定。采用多变量 Cox 回归模型分析基线和进展后变量对 OS、PFS 和 SBRT 后下一步系统治疗生存期的影响。结果在 135 例少进展患者中,最常见的原发肿瘤是肺癌(n = 46,34.1%),96 例患者在少进展后继续接受当前的系统治疗。在 39 名更换系统疗法的患者中,28 人(71.8%)暂停或中止了治疗,11 人(28.2%)立即开始了另一种系统疗法。在中位随访 27.2 个月后,寡进展后更换系统疗法和继续系统疗法的患者的中位 OS(32.1 个月 vs. 38.2 个月,p = 0.47)和 PFS(4.3 个月 vs. 3.4 个月,p = 0.6)相当。两组患者接受下一步系统治疗的间隔时间相当(p = 0.6)。ECOG表现状态为2和寡进展后立即开始新的系统治疗与未接受下一步系统治疗的生存率较低有关,而与诱导状态相比,去新的OMD状态与未接受下一步系统治疗的生存率较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信