A novel sequential endocardial mapping strategy for locating atrial fibrillation sources based on repetitive conduction patterns: An in-silico study

Victor Gonçalves Marques , Ali Gharaviri , Ozan Özgül , Simone Pezzuto , Angelo Auricchio , Pietro Bonizzi , Stef Zeemering , Ulrich Schotten
{"title":"A novel sequential endocardial mapping strategy for locating atrial fibrillation sources based on repetitive conduction patterns: An in-silico study","authors":"Victor Gonçalves Marques ,&nbsp;Ali Gharaviri ,&nbsp;Ozan Özgül ,&nbsp;Simone Pezzuto ,&nbsp;Angelo Auricchio ,&nbsp;Pietro Bonizzi ,&nbsp;Stef Zeemering ,&nbsp;Ulrich Schotten","doi":"10.1016/j.jmccpl.2024.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), localized extra-pulmonary vein sources may contribute to arrhythmia recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation. This in-silico study proposes a high-density sequential mapping strategy to localize such sources.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Catheter repositioning was guided by repetitive conduction patterns, moving against the prevailing conduction direction (upstream) toward the sources. Sources were found either by locally identifying conduction patterns or by encircling the region harboring them. We simulated source tracking in an in-silico atrial model, comparing random vs. upstream-guided catheter repositioning (with and without encircling). To assess performance in increasing AF complexities, we simulated AF in 3 groups: atria with reentry-anchoring scars, without fibrosis, and with severe endomysial fibrosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to random mapping, the upstream-guided approach successfully located sources more often (anchored reentries: <span><math><mn>70.6</mn><mo>%</mo></math></span> vs. <span><math><mn>10.6</mn><mo>%</mo></math></span>; no fibrosis: <span><math><mn>87.9</mn><mo>%</mo></math></span> vs. <span><math><mn>22.1</mn><mo>%</mo></math></span>; with fibrosis: <span><math><mn>95.0</mn><mo>%</mo></math></span> vs. <span><math><mn>60.9</mn><mo>%</mo></math></span> of tracking procedures, all <span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0.001</mn></math></span>), using fewer steps (median [IQR]: 11 [7;23] vs. 26 [13;35]; 10 [6;19] vs. 19 [10;27]; 11 [7;19] vs. 16 [8;30], respectively, all <span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0.05</mn></math></span>). Adding source encircling increased source detection (98.1 %, 100 %, and 99.5 %, all <span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0.01</mn></math></span> vs. local detection only), reducing required steps (9 [6;12], 8 [6;12], and 9 [6;13], all <span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0.05</mn></math></span>). In some cases (11.9 %, 17.1 %, and 10.5 % of procedures), the algorithm encircled regions <span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span>15 mm from the source.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Moving mapping catheters upstream improves source detection efficiency, even in the presence of severe fibrosis. Encircling sources may help find regions of interest in fewer steps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976124000059/pdfft?md5=1880c497f6273918ec3b9fde2673d48c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772976124000059-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976124000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), localized extra-pulmonary vein sources may contribute to arrhythmia recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation. This in-silico study proposes a high-density sequential mapping strategy to localize such sources.

Method

Catheter repositioning was guided by repetitive conduction patterns, moving against the prevailing conduction direction (upstream) toward the sources. Sources were found either by locally identifying conduction patterns or by encircling the region harboring them. We simulated source tracking in an in-silico atrial model, comparing random vs. upstream-guided catheter repositioning (with and without encircling). To assess performance in increasing AF complexities, we simulated AF in 3 groups: atria with reentry-anchoring scars, without fibrosis, and with severe endomysial fibrosis.

Results

Compared to random mapping, the upstream-guided approach successfully located sources more often (anchored reentries: 70.6% vs. 10.6%; no fibrosis: 87.9% vs. 22.1%; with fibrosis: 95.0% vs. 60.9% of tracking procedures, all p<0.001), using fewer steps (median [IQR]: 11 [7;23] vs. 26 [13;35]; 10 [6;19] vs. 19 [10;27]; 11 [7;19] vs. 16 [8;30], respectively, all p<0.05). Adding source encircling increased source detection (98.1 %, 100 %, and 99.5 %, all p<0.01 vs. local detection only), reducing required steps (9 [6;12], 8 [6;12], and 9 [6;13], all p<0.05). In some cases (11.9 %, 17.1 %, and 10.5 % of procedures), the algorithm encircled regions >15 mm from the source.

Conclusion

Moving mapping catheters upstream improves source detection efficiency, even in the presence of severe fibrosis. Encircling sources may help find regions of interest in fewer steps.

基于重复传导模式定位心房颤动源的新型顺序心内膜映射策略:模拟研究
背景在持续性心房颤动(房颤)中,局部肺静脉外源可能是肺静脉隔离后心律失常复发的原因。方法导管的重新定位以重复传导模式为指导,逆着当时的传导方向(上游)向源头移动。通过局部识别传导模式或环绕存在传导模式的区域来寻找病源。我们在一个模拟心房模型中模拟了源追踪,比较了随机与上游引导导管重新定位(包围和不包围)。为了评估房颤复杂性增加时的性能,我们模拟了三组房颤:有再入锚定疤痕的心房、无纤维化的心房和有严重肌内膜纤维化的心房:10.6%; 无纤维化:87.9% vs. 22.1%; 有纤维化:95.0% vs. 60.9% of tracking procedures, all p<0.001),使用的步骤更少(中位数 [IQR]:分别为 11 [7;23] vs. 26 [13;35];10 [6;19] vs. 19 [10;27];11 [7;19] vs. 16 [8;30],均 p<0.05)。增加声源包围提高了声源检测率(98.1%、100% 和 99.5%,均 p<0.01 vs. 仅局部检测),减少了所需步骤(9 [6;12]、8 [6;12]和 9 [6;13],均 p<0.05)。在某些情况下(11.9%、17.1% 和 10.5% 的手术),该算法包围了距离放射源 15 mm 的区域。环绕放射源有助于在更少的步骤中找到感兴趣的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信