Remote ischemic conditioning reduces postoperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lin-Lin Chen, Yun-Tai Yao
{"title":"Remote ischemic conditioning reduces postoperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lin-Lin Chen, Yun-Tai Yao","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12827-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The current study was designed to systemically investigate the impact of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) on intra- and postoperative bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RIC with control on intra- and postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery; 2) RCT; 3) perioperative administration of RIC compared to control; 4) outcomes of interest reported. Exclusion criteria included: 1) case reports, reviews, or abstracts; 2) animal or cell studies; 3) duplicate publications; 4) studies lacking information about outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Databases search yielded 24 RCTs including 3530 patients, 1765 patients were allocated into RIC group and 1765 into control group. The current study suggested that RIC administration was associated with reduced postoperative blood loss (WMD=-57.89; 95% CI: -89.89 to -25.89; P=0.0004). RIC did not affect the volume of intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-4.02; 95% CI: -14.09 to 6.05; P=0.43), the volume of intra- and postoperative transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) (WMD=-15.66; 95% CI: -39.35 to 8.03; P=0.20), the re-exploration for bleeding (WMD=-0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.01; P=0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study demonstrated that, RIC reduced post-operative blood loss in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. It also indicated that, RIC reduced intra-operative RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, RIC did not influence intra-operative bleeding, post-operative blood transfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"280-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12827-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The current study was designed to systemically investigate the impact of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) on intra- and postoperative bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Evidence acquisition: We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RIC with control on intra- and postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery; 2) RCT; 3) perioperative administration of RIC compared to control; 4) outcomes of interest reported. Exclusion criteria included: 1) case reports, reviews, or abstracts; 2) animal or cell studies; 3) duplicate publications; 4) studies lacking information about outcomes of interest.

Evidence synthesis: Databases search yielded 24 RCTs including 3530 patients, 1765 patients were allocated into RIC group and 1765 into control group. The current study suggested that RIC administration was associated with reduced postoperative blood loss (WMD=-57.89; 95% CI: -89.89 to -25.89; P=0.0004). RIC did not affect the volume of intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-4.02; 95% CI: -14.09 to 6.05; P=0.43), the volume of intra- and postoperative transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) (WMD=-15.66; 95% CI: -39.35 to 8.03; P=0.20), the re-exploration for bleeding (WMD=-0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.01; P=0.21).

Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that, RIC reduced post-operative blood loss in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. It also indicated that, RIC reduced intra-operative RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, RIC did not influence intra-operative bleeding, post-operative blood transfusion.

远程缺血调理可减少成人心脏手术患者的术后出血:系统综述和荟萃分析。
导言:本研究旨在系统调查 RIC 对心脏手术患者术中、术后出血和输血的影响:我们纳入了所有比较 RIC 与对照组对术中、术后失血和输血影响的随机对照试验 (RCT)。纳入标准如下1)接受心脏手术的成年患者;2)RCT;3)围手术期使用 RIC 与对照组相比;4)报告的相关结果。排除标准包括1)病例报告、综述或摘要;2)动物或细胞研究;3)重复出版物;4)缺乏相关结果信息的研究:通过数据库检索获得了 24 项 RCT 研究,包括 3530 名患者,其中 1765 名患者被分配到 RIC 组,1765 名患者被分配到对照组。目前的研究表明,使用 RIC 与术后失血量减少有关(WMD=-57.89;95% CI:-89.89 至 -25.89;P=0.0004)。RIC并不影响术中失血的发生率(WMD=-4.02;95% CI:-14.09 至 6.05;P=0.43)、术中和术后输注红细胞的数量(WMD=-15.66;95% CI:-39.35 至 8.03;P=0.20)、因出血而再次手术(WMD=-0.01;95% CI:-0.03 至 0.01;P=0.21):RIC可减少成人心脏手术患者的术后失血,并减少冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术中的红细胞输注。然而,RIC 并不影响术中出血量、因出血而再次手术的量或术后输血量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信