Evaluating Barriers to Opioid Use Disorder Treatment From Patients' Perspectives.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2024.458349
Cecilia M T Nguyen, Grace Kubiak, Neil Dixit, Staci A Young, John R Hayes
{"title":"Evaluating Barriers to Opioid Use Disorder Treatment From Patients' Perspectives.","authors":"Cecilia M T Nguyen, Grace Kubiak, Neil Dixit, Staci A Young, John R Hayes","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.458349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Utilizing medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) is both highly effective and unfortunately underutilized in the US health care system. Stigma surrounding substance use disorders, insufficient provider knowledge about substance use disorders and MOUD, and historical lack of physicians with X-waivers to prescribe buprenorphine contribute to this underutilization. Our study aimed to elucidate barriers to accessing MOUD in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with patients receiving MOUD at a family medicine residency program in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the qualitative analysis Framework Method. Researchers in our team reviewed transcripts, coding for specific topics of discussion. Coded transcript data were then sorted into a matrix to identify common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews with 30 participants showed that motivations to seek treatment appeared self-driven and/or for loved ones. Eighteen patients noted concerns with treatment including treatment denial and efficacy of treatment. Housing instability, experiences with incarceration, insurance, and transportation were common structural barriers to treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary drivers to seek treatment were patients themselves and/or loved ones. Barriers to care include lack of effective transportation, previous experience with the carceral system, and relative scarcity of clinicians offering MOUD. Future studies may further explore effects of structural inadequacies and biases on MOUD access and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.458349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Utilizing medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) is both highly effective and unfortunately underutilized in the US health care system. Stigma surrounding substance use disorders, insufficient provider knowledge about substance use disorders and MOUD, and historical lack of physicians with X-waivers to prescribe buprenorphine contribute to this underutilization. Our study aimed to elucidate barriers to accessing MOUD in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with patients receiving MOUD at a family medicine residency program in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the qualitative analysis Framework Method. Researchers in our team reviewed transcripts, coding for specific topics of discussion. Coded transcript data were then sorted into a matrix to identify common themes.

Results: Interviews with 30 participants showed that motivations to seek treatment appeared self-driven and/or for loved ones. Eighteen patients noted concerns with treatment including treatment denial and efficacy of treatment. Housing instability, experiences with incarceration, insurance, and transportation were common structural barriers to treatment.

Conclusions: Primary drivers to seek treatment were patients themselves and/or loved ones. Barriers to care include lack of effective transportation, previous experience with the carceral system, and relative scarcity of clinicians offering MOUD. Future studies may further explore effects of structural inadequacies and biases on MOUD access and quality.

从患者角度评估阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的障碍。
导言:利用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)在美国医疗保健系统中既非常有效,但遗憾的是却未得到充分利用。围绕药物使用障碍的污名化、医疗服务提供者对药物使用障碍和 MOUD 的认识不足,以及历史上缺乏拥有 X 豁免权的医生来开丁丙诺啡处方,都是造成这种利用率不足的原因。我们的研究旨在阐明威斯康星州密尔沃基市获得 MOUD 的障碍:我们在威斯康星州密尔沃基市的一个家庭医学住院医师培训项目中对接受 MOUD 的患者进行了半结构式访谈。我们对访谈进行了录音、逐字记录,并使用定性分析框架法进行了分析。我们团队的研究人员审阅了记录誊本,对讨论的特定主题进行了编码。然后,将编码后的记录数据归类到一个矩阵中,以确定共同的主题:与 30 名参与者的访谈显示,寻求治疗的动机似乎是自我驱动和/或为了亲人。18 名患者指出了对治疗的担忧,包括拒绝治疗和治疗效果。住房不稳定、监禁经历、保险和交通是常见的治疗结构性障碍:结论:寻求治疗的主要动力来自患者本人和/或其亲人。接受治疗的障碍包括缺乏有效的交通方式、以前的监禁经历以及提供MOUD的临床医生相对稀缺。未来的研究可能会进一步探讨结构性缺陷和偏见对 "谅解备忘录 "的获取和质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信