[The effectiveness of digital care applications in people with need of home care: A systematic review].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000983
Sandy Scheibe, Patrick Timpel, Melanie Mäder, Ria Heinrich, Joachim Kugler, Tonio Schönfelder
{"title":"[The effectiveness of digital care applications in people with need of home care: A systematic review].","authors":"Sandy Scheibe, Patrick Timpel, Melanie Mäder, Ria Heinrich, Joachim Kugler, Tonio Schönfelder","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a000983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectiveness of digital care applications in people with need of home care: A systematic review <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> The growing need for long-term care poses challenges for healthcare systems. In June 2021, digital care applications (DiPA) were introduced as a new service in the statutory long-term care insurance in Germany. Their aim is to counteract the increased care need and/or support independence in the home. <i>Aim:</i> This project systematically identified and reported on national and international evidence on DiPA effectiveness, as described by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). <i>Methods:</i> The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement by means of systematic searches in the databases Medline and Cinahl, and supplemented by an extensive manual search (08/2022). Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). The results were synthesized narratively. <i>Results:</i> Eight randomized controlled studies were included; improvements in cognition, activities of daily living, and mobility in home care patients, were reported. Study quality was low to moderate, due to mostly unblinded study designs and low case numbers. <i>Conclusions:</i> The currently available evidence fails to provide a reliable basis for assessing the benefits of DiPA, to neither DiPA manufacturers, nor to responsible parties in the healthcare system. Further research on DiPA effectiveness, particularly with high-quality studies, are necessary to assess its potential in the German care sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of digital care applications in people with need of home care: A systematic review Abstract: Background: The growing need for long-term care poses challenges for healthcare systems. In June 2021, digital care applications (DiPA) were introduced as a new service in the statutory long-term care insurance in Germany. Their aim is to counteract the increased care need and/or support independence in the home. Aim: This project systematically identified and reported on national and international evidence on DiPA effectiveness, as described by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). Methods: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement by means of systematic searches in the databases Medline and Cinahl, and supplemented by an extensive manual search (08/2022). Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). The results were synthesized narratively. Results: Eight randomized controlled studies were included; improvements in cognition, activities of daily living, and mobility in home care patients, were reported. Study quality was low to moderate, due to mostly unblinded study designs and low case numbers. Conclusions: The currently available evidence fails to provide a reliable basis for assessing the benefits of DiPA, to neither DiPA manufacturers, nor to responsible parties in the healthcare system. Further research on DiPA effectiveness, particularly with high-quality studies, are necessary to assess its potential in the German care sector.

[数字护理应用在需要家庭护理的人群中的有效性:系统综述]。
数字护理应用在需要家庭护理的人群中的有效性:系统综述 摘要:背景:日益增长的长期护理需求给医疗保健系统带来了挑战。2021 年 6 月,数字护理应用程序(DiPA)作为一项新服务被引入德国法定长期护理保险。其目的是应对日益增长的护理需求和/或支持居家独立。目的:该项目系统地识别并报告了联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(BfArM)所描述的有关 DiPA 有效性的国内和国际证据。方法:根据 PRISMA 声明,通过在 Medline 和 Cinahl 数据库中进行系统检索,并辅以广泛的人工检索(08/2022),进行了系统性综述。研究质量采用偏倚风险工具(RoB2)进行评估。对结果进行了叙述性综合。研究结果共纳入了 8 项随机对照研究;这些研究报告了居家护理患者在认知、日常生活活动和行动能力方面的改善情况。由于研究设计大多未设盲法,且病例数较少,因此研究质量处于中下水平。结论:无论是对 DiPA 制造商还是对医疗保健系统中的责任方而言,目前可用的证据都无法为评估 DiPA 的益处提供可靠的依据。有必要进一步研究 DiPA 的有效性,尤其是高质量的研究,以评估其在德国医疗保健领域的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信