Which Remote Rehabilitation Interventions Work Best for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Depression? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Pavlos Bobos, Tiago V Pereira, Dimitra V Pouliopoulou, Mariana Charakopoulou-Travlou, Goris Nazari, Joy C MacDermid
{"title":"Which Remote Rehabilitation Interventions Work Best for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Depression? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pavlos Bobos, Tiago V Pereira, Dimitra V Pouliopoulou, Mariana Charakopoulou-Travlou, Goris Nazari, Joy C MacDermid","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To evaluate the effectiveness of remote rehabilitation interventions for people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. <b>DESIGN:</b> A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2023. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of remote rehabilitation interventions in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> We used Bayesian random-effects models for the NMA. Effect estimates were comparisons between rehabilitation interventions and waitlist. We performed a sensitivity analysis based on bias in the randomization process, large trials (>100 patients per arm) and musculoskeletal condition. <b>RESULTS:</b> Fifty-eight randomized controlled trials involving 10 278 participants (median sample size: 137; interquartile range [IQR]: 77-236) were included. Interactive voice response cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.66, 95% credible interval [CrI] -1.17 to -0.16), CBT in person (SMD -0.50, 95% CrI -0.97 to -0.04), and mobile app CBT plus exercise (SMD -0.37, 95% CrI -0.69 to -0.02) were superior to waitlist at 12-week follow-up for reducing pain (> 98% probability of superiority). For depression outcomes, Internet-delivered CBT and telecare were superior to waitlist at 12-week follow-up (SMD -0.51, 95% CrI -0.87 to -0.13) (> 99% probability of superiority). For pain outcomes, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. For depression outcomes, the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. The proportion of dropouts attributed to adverse events was unclear. No intervention was associated with higher odds of dropout. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Interactive voice response CBT and mobile app CBT plus exercise showed similar treatment effects with in-person CBT on pain reduction among people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression had over 98% probability of superiority than waitlist control at 12-week follow-up. Internet-delivered CBT and telecare had over 99% probability of superiority than waitlist control for improving depression outcomes at 12-week follow-up. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(6):1-16. Epub 26 February 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12216</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"361-376"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of remote rehabilitation interventions for people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. DESIGN: A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of remote rehabilitation interventions in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used Bayesian random-effects models for the NMA. Effect estimates were comparisons between rehabilitation interventions and waitlist. We performed a sensitivity analysis based on bias in the randomization process, large trials (>100 patients per arm) and musculoskeletal condition. RESULTS: Fifty-eight randomized controlled trials involving 10 278 participants (median sample size: 137; interquartile range [IQR]: 77-236) were included. Interactive voice response cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.66, 95% credible interval [CrI] -1.17 to -0.16), CBT in person (SMD -0.50, 95% CrI -0.97 to -0.04), and mobile app CBT plus exercise (SMD -0.37, 95% CrI -0.69 to -0.02) were superior to waitlist at 12-week follow-up for reducing pain (> 98% probability of superiority). For depression outcomes, Internet-delivered CBT and telecare were superior to waitlist at 12-week follow-up (SMD -0.51, 95% CrI -0.87 to -0.13) (> 99% probability of superiority). For pain outcomes, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. For depression outcomes, the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. The proportion of dropouts attributed to adverse events was unclear. No intervention was associated with higher odds of dropout. CONCLUSION: Interactive voice response CBT and mobile app CBT plus exercise showed similar treatment effects with in-person CBT on pain reduction among people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression had over 98% probability of superiority than waitlist control at 12-week follow-up. Internet-delivered CBT and telecare had over 99% probability of superiority than waitlist control for improving depression outcomes at 12-week follow-up. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(6):1-16. Epub 26 February 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12216.

哪些远程康复干预措施对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和抑郁最有效?贝叶斯网络元分析》。
目的:评估针对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和抑郁症患者的远程康复干预措施的有效性。设计:对随机对照试验进行系统回顾和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。文献检索:截至 2023 年 5 月的文献检索:Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、CINAHL、EMBASE、LILACS、MEDLINE、PSYNDEX 和 PsycINFO。研究选择标准:对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和抑郁症患者的远程康复干预效果进行评估的随机对照试验。数据分析:我们采用贝叶斯随机效应模型进行近似分析。效果估计值是康复干预与候补名单之间的比较。我们根据随机化过程中的偏差、大型试验(每臂大于 100 名患者)和肌肉骨骼状况进行了敏感性分析。结果:共纳入58项随机对照试验,涉及10278名参与者(样本量中位数:137(IQR:77至236))。在12周的随访中,交互式语音应答认知行为疗法(CBT)(SMD -0.66,95%CrI -1.17至-0.16)、当面CBT(SMD -0.50,95%CrI -0.97至-0.04)和移动应用CBT加运动(SMD -0.37,95%CrI -0.69至-0.02)在减轻疼痛方面优于候补名单(优于98%的概率)。在抑郁结果方面,12周随访时,互联网提供的CBT和远程护理优于候补名单(SMD -0.51,95% CrI -0.87至-0.13)(优越性概率大于99%)。疼痛结果的证据确定性从低到中度不等。对于抑郁结果,证据的确定性从很低到中等不等。因不良事件而退出的比例尚不清楚。没有任何干预措施与更高的辍学几率相关。结论:在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中,交互式语音应答 CBT 和手机应用 CBT 加运动在减轻疼痛方面显示出与面对面 CBT 相似的治疗效果,并且在 12 周的随访中,其优于候补对照组的概率超过 98%。在12周的随访中,互联网提供的CBT和远程护理在改善抑郁症疗效方面的优越性超过99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信