Effect of Back-Cut Point Needle Bevel Angle on Deterioration After Multiple Punctures in Central Vein Simulation.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2024-02-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S447188
Genya Urimoto, Takeshi Suzuki, Mitsumasa Matsuda, Kenzi Ito, Yasushi Orihashi, Toshiyasu Suzuki
{"title":"Effect of Back-Cut Point Needle Bevel Angle on Deterioration After Multiple Punctures in Central Vein Simulation.","authors":"Genya Urimoto, Takeshi Suzuki, Mitsumasa Matsuda, Kenzi Ito, Yasushi Orihashi, Toshiyasu Suzuki","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S447188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple needle punctures during central venous line insertion can lead to serious complications. Needle deterioration owing to repeated punctures may be a major cause. We hypothesized that there is an optimal bevel angle for a back-cut point needle that is resistant to deterioration. In this study, we examined the effect of bevel angle differences in a back-cut point needle on needle tip deterioration caused by multiple punctures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The resin target was punctured perpendicularly using back-cut point needles with three bevel angles (15°, 17°, and 19°; n=8 for each angle) at a speed of 200 mm/min. The same needle was used for ten consecutive punctures at different locations on the target. The force applied to the needle was recorded as puncture force. The puncture force waveform is bimodal. The second peak values, which formed the maximum values of puncture force, were the focus of the main analysis. We considered a 5% elevation from the first to the 10th puncture force as needle deterioration, and the average slope value of the regression line between the puncture number and puncture force was used. When the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the slope value was less than 0.008889, the needle was considered to be resistant to deterioration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The slopes of the second peak values during 10 consecutive punctures for each bevel angle (15°, 17°, 19°) were 0.003011 ± 0.01085 [-0.006056, 0.012077], 0.006116±0.007431 [-0.000096, 0.012328], and 0.001515 ± 0.005783 [-0.003320, 0.006349], respectively (mean ± standard deviation [95% CI]). Only the 19° angle needle had a smaller upper limit of the 95% CI for a slope value of 0.008889.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 19° bevel angle back-cut point needle was more resistant to deterioration than the 15° and 17° angle needles were.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S447188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple needle punctures during central venous line insertion can lead to serious complications. Needle deterioration owing to repeated punctures may be a major cause. We hypothesized that there is an optimal bevel angle for a back-cut point needle that is resistant to deterioration. In this study, we examined the effect of bevel angle differences in a back-cut point needle on needle tip deterioration caused by multiple punctures.

Methods: The resin target was punctured perpendicularly using back-cut point needles with three bevel angles (15°, 17°, and 19°; n=8 for each angle) at a speed of 200 mm/min. The same needle was used for ten consecutive punctures at different locations on the target. The force applied to the needle was recorded as puncture force. The puncture force waveform is bimodal. The second peak values, which formed the maximum values of puncture force, were the focus of the main analysis. We considered a 5% elevation from the first to the 10th puncture force as needle deterioration, and the average slope value of the regression line between the puncture number and puncture force was used. When the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the slope value was less than 0.008889, the needle was considered to be resistant to deterioration.

Results: The slopes of the second peak values during 10 consecutive punctures for each bevel angle (15°, 17°, 19°) were 0.003011 ± 0.01085 [-0.006056, 0.012077], 0.006116±0.007431 [-0.000096, 0.012328], and 0.001515 ± 0.005783 [-0.003320, 0.006349], respectively (mean ± standard deviation [95% CI]). Only the 19° angle needle had a smaller upper limit of the 95% CI for a slope value of 0.008889.

Conclusion: The 19° bevel angle back-cut point needle was more resistant to deterioration than the 15° and 17° angle needles were.

模拟中央静脉多次穿刺后后切点针斜角对恶化的影响
背景:在中心静脉置管过程中,多次针头穿刺可导致严重的并发症。反复穿刺导致针头老化可能是一个主要原因。我们假设后切点针有一个最佳的斜角,可以防止针头老化。在这项研究中,我们考察了后切点针的斜角差异对多次穿刺造成的针尖劣化的影响:方法:使用三种斜角(15°、17° 和 19°,每种斜角 8 个)的后切尖针,以 200 毫米/分钟的速度垂直穿刺树脂目标。同一针头在目标物的不同位置连续穿刺十次。针上施加的力被记录为穿刺力。穿刺力波形呈双峰状。穿刺力最大值的第二个峰值是主要分析的重点。我们将第一次至第十次穿刺力之间 5%的升高视为穿刺针退化,并使用穿刺次数与穿刺力之间回归线的平均斜率值。当斜率值的95%置信区间(CI)上限小于0.008889时,则认为针具有抗劣化能力:每个斜面角度(15°、17°、19°)连续 10 次穿刺的第二次峰值斜率分别为 0.003011 ± 0.01085 [-0.006056, 0.012077]、0.006116±0.007431 [-0.000096, 0.012328] 和 0.001515 ± 0.005783 [-0.003320, 0.006349](平均值 ± 标准差 [95%CI])。只有 19°斜角针的斜率值 0.008889 的 95% CI 上限较小:结论:19°斜角后切点针比 15°和 17°斜角针更耐恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信