Improved Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Patients With Mid-MELD-Na Scores Listed in Centers Receptive to Use of Organs Donated After Circulatory Death.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000004955
Katsunori Miyake, Lucy C Chau, Sheri Trudeau, Toshihiro Kitajima, Niluka Wickramaratne, Shingo Shimada, Ahmed Nassar, Humberto C Gonzalez, Deepak Venkat, Dilip Moonka, Atsushi Yoshida, Marwan S Abouljoud, Shunji Nagai
{"title":"Improved Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Patients With Mid-MELD-Na Scores Listed in Centers Receptive to Use of Organs Donated After Circulatory Death.","authors":"Katsunori Miyake, Lucy C Chau, Sheri Trudeau, Toshihiro Kitajima, Niluka Wickramaratne, Shingo Shimada, Ahmed Nassar, Humberto C Gonzalez, Deepak Venkat, Dilip Moonka, Atsushi Yoshida, Marwan S Abouljoud, Shunji Nagai","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000004955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplant (LT) using organs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has been increasing in the United States. We investigated whether transplant centers' receptiveness to use of DCD organs impacted patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transplant centers were classified as very receptive (group 1), receptive (2), or less receptive (3) based on the DCD acceptance rate and DCD transplant percentage. Using organ procurement and transplantation network/UNOS registry data for 20 435 patients listed for LT from January 2020 to June 2022, we compared rates of 1-y transplant probability and waitlist mortality between groups, broken down by model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted analyses, patients in group 1 centers with MELD-Na scores 6 to 29 were significantly more likely to undergo transplant than those in group 3 (aHR range 1.51-2.11, P  < 0.001). Results were similar in comparisons between groups 1 and 2 (aHR range 1.41-1.81, P  < 0.001) and between groups 2 and 3 with MELD-Na 15-24 (aHR 1.19-1.20, P  < 0.007). Likewise, patients with MELD-Na score 20 to 29 in group 1 centers had lower waitlist mortality than those in group 3 (scores, 20-24: aHR, 0.71, P  = 0.03; score, 25-29: aHR, 0.51, P  < 0.001); those in group 1 also had lower waitlist mortality compared with group 2 (scores 20-24: aHR0.69, P  = 0.02; scores 25-29: aHR 0.63, P  = 0.03). One-year posttransplant survival of DCD LT patients did not vary significantly compared with donation after brain dead.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that transplant centers' use of DCD livers can improve waitlist outcomes, particularly among mid-MELD-Na patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver transplant (LT) using organs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has been increasing in the United States. We investigated whether transplant centers' receptiveness to use of DCD organs impacted patient outcomes.

Methods: Transplant centers were classified as very receptive (group 1), receptive (2), or less receptive (3) based on the DCD acceptance rate and DCD transplant percentage. Using organ procurement and transplantation network/UNOS registry data for 20 435 patients listed for LT from January 2020 to June 2022, we compared rates of 1-y transplant probability and waitlist mortality between groups, broken down by model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) categories.

Results: In adjusted analyses, patients in group 1 centers with MELD-Na scores 6 to 29 were significantly more likely to undergo transplant than those in group 3 (aHR range 1.51-2.11, P  < 0.001). Results were similar in comparisons between groups 1 and 2 (aHR range 1.41-1.81, P  < 0.001) and between groups 2 and 3 with MELD-Na 15-24 (aHR 1.19-1.20, P  < 0.007). Likewise, patients with MELD-Na score 20 to 29 in group 1 centers had lower waitlist mortality than those in group 3 (scores, 20-24: aHR, 0.71, P  = 0.03; score, 25-29: aHR, 0.51, P  < 0.001); those in group 1 also had lower waitlist mortality compared with group 2 (scores 20-24: aHR0.69, P  = 0.02; scores 25-29: aHR 0.63, P  = 0.03). One-year posttransplant survival of DCD LT patients did not vary significantly compared with donation after brain dead.

Conclusions: We conclude that transplant centers' use of DCD livers can improve waitlist outcomes, particularly among mid-MELD-Na patients.

在接受使用循环死亡后捐献的器官的中心进行肝移植的中MMELD-Na评分患者的候选结果有所改善。
背景:在美国,使用循环死亡(DCD)后捐献的器官进行肝移植(LT)的情况越来越多。我们调查了移植中心对使用 DCD 器官的接受程度是否会影响患者的预后:方法:根据 DCD 接受率和 DCD 移植比例,移植中心被分为非常乐于接受(第 1 组)、乐于接受(第 2 组)或不太乐于接受(第 3 组)。我们使用器官采购与移植网络/UNOS登记的2020年1月至2022年6月期间20 435名LT患者的数据,比较了各组间1年移植概率和候补名单死亡率,并按终末期肝病钠模型(MELD-Na)类别进行了细分:结果:在调整后的分析中,MELD-Na 评分为 6 到 29 分的第 1 组中心患者接受移植手术的几率明显高于第 3 组(aHR 范围为 1.51-2.11,P 结论:我们得出的结论是,移植中心在使用 MELD-Na 模型的同时,也在使用其他模型:我们得出结论:移植中心使用 DCD 肝脏可以改善候选结果,尤其是 MELD-Na 分值中等的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信