Study of Empiric Antibiotic Prescription Patterns and Microbiological Isolates in Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable ICU Patients With Community-Acquired Sepsis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1177/08850666241234625
Mahuya Bhattacharyya, Ananya Saha, Subhash Todi
{"title":"Study of Empiric Antibiotic Prescription Patterns and Microbiological Isolates in Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable ICU Patients With Community-Acquired Sepsis.","authors":"Mahuya Bhattacharyya, Ananya Saha, Subhash Todi","doi":"10.1177/08850666241234625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The efficacy of combination empiric antibiotic therapy for all intensive care unit (ICU) patients with community-acquired sepsis is a subject of ongoing debate in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance. This study was conducted to evaluate the patterns of antibiotic usage and microbial resistance in sepsis patients admitted to the ICU with both hemodynamically stable (HS) and unstable states and to analyze their clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> In this observational study, patients aged 18 years and above who received antibiotics upon admission and had a culture report were included. These patients were categorized into the following groups: HS and hemodynamically unstable (HU), single or combined antibiotics group (more than one antibiotic used empirically to cover one or more groups of organisms), culture-positive and culture-negative group. The microbiological isolates were grouped according to their identified resistance patterns. The outcome parameters involved assessing the differences in empiric antibiotics use upon admission and microbial resistance with hemodynamic stability and investigating any associations with ICU and hospital outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The study included a total of 2675 patients, of which 70.3% were in the HS group, and 29.7% in the HU group. The use of combination antibiotics was significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0 .0001) across all groups. Carbapenems were used more frequently in the single antibiotic group (<i>p</i> < 0 .001). The culture was positive in 27.8% (<i>n</i>  =  747) of patients. A significantly higher number of patients in the HU group (<i>p</i> < 0 .001) were found to have carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant organisms. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the HU group (<i>p</i> < 0 .001), the culture-positive group with resistance (<i>p</i> < 0 .001), and the HS patients who received combination antibiotics. <b>Conclusion:</b> The usage of combination antibiotics, coupled with the presence of resistant organisms, emerged as an important variable in predicting ICU and hospital mortality rates in cases of community-acquired sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241234625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of combination empiric antibiotic therapy for all intensive care unit (ICU) patients with community-acquired sepsis is a subject of ongoing debate in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance. This study was conducted to evaluate the patterns of antibiotic usage and microbial resistance in sepsis patients admitted to the ICU with both hemodynamically stable (HS) and unstable states and to analyze their clinical outcomes. Methods: In this observational study, patients aged 18 years and above who received antibiotics upon admission and had a culture report were included. These patients were categorized into the following groups: HS and hemodynamically unstable (HU), single or combined antibiotics group (more than one antibiotic used empirically to cover one or more groups of organisms), culture-positive and culture-negative group. The microbiological isolates were grouped according to their identified resistance patterns. The outcome parameters involved assessing the differences in empiric antibiotics use upon admission and microbial resistance with hemodynamic stability and investigating any associations with ICU and hospital outcomes. Results: The study included a total of 2675 patients, of which 70.3% were in the HS group, and 29.7% in the HU group. The use of combination antibiotics was significantly higher (p < 0 .0001) across all groups. Carbapenems were used more frequently in the single antibiotic group (p < 0 .001). The culture was positive in 27.8% (n  =  747) of patients. A significantly higher number of patients in the HU group (p < 0 .001) were found to have carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant organisms. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the HU group (p < 0 .001), the culture-positive group with resistance (p < 0 .001), and the HS patients who received combination antibiotics. Conclusion: The usage of combination antibiotics, coupled with the presence of resistant organisms, emerged as an important variable in predicting ICU and hospital mortality rates in cases of community-acquired sepsis.

血流动力学稳定和不稳定的社区获得性败血症重症监护病房患者的经验性抗生素处方模式和微生物分离物研究。
背景:在抗生素耐药性不断增加的时代,对所有重症监护病房(ICU)社区获得性败血症患者进行联合经验性抗生素治疗的疗效一直是一个争论不休的话题。本研究旨在评估血流动力学稳定(HS)和不稳定状态下入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者的抗生素使用模式和微生物耐药性,并分析其临床结果。研究方法在这项观察性研究中,纳入了入院时接受抗生素治疗并有培养报告的 18 岁及以上患者。这些患者被分为以下几组:HS 和血流动力学不稳定 (HU)、单一或联合抗生素组(经验性使用一种以上抗生素以覆盖一组或多组微生物)、培养阳性组和培养阴性组。微生物分离物根据其已确定的耐药性模式进行分组。结果参数包括评估入院时经验性抗生素使用和微生物耐药性与血液动力学稳定性的差异,并调查与重症监护室和住院结果的任何关联。研究结果研究共纳入 2675 名患者,其中 70.3% 属于 HS 组,29.7% 属于 HU 组。在所有组别中,联合抗生素的使用率明显更高(p < 0 .0001)。单一抗生素组中碳青霉烯类的使用频率更高(p < 0 .001)。27.8%(n = 747)的患者培养结果呈阳性。HU组中发现耐碳青霉烯类和耐多药生物的患者人数明显较多(p < 0 .001)。重症监护室和住院死亡率在HU组(p < 0 .001)、耐药性培养阳性组(p < 0 .001)和接受联合抗生素治疗的HS患者中明显较高。结论在预测社区获得性败血症病例的重症监护室和住院死亡率时,联合抗生素的使用以及耐药菌的存在是一个重要变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信