Study to evaluate awareness about medication errors and impact of an educational intervention among healthcare personnel in a cancer hospital.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1177/10781552241235898
Puskar Kunwor, Bijaya Basyal, Nabin Pathak, Pankaj Vaidya, Sudip Shrestha
{"title":"Study to evaluate awareness about medication errors and impact of an educational intervention among healthcare personnel in a cancer hospital.","authors":"Puskar Kunwor, Bijaya Basyal, Nabin Pathak, Pankaj Vaidya, Sudip Shrestha","doi":"10.1177/10781552241235898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionMedication errors (MEs) are preventable incidents that can result in harm to patients. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to be well-informed about MEs. This study aims to assess the awareness levels of HCPs and the impact of educational intervention on their understanding of MEs.MethodsResponses to a 17-question structured, self-administered questionnaire assessing the awareness of HCPs regarding fundamental aspects of MEs, ME reporting systems, and their ability to make recommendations for improving the system for handling the MEs were collected both before and after two weeks of educational intervention administration.ResultsOf a total of 114 HCPs who initially participated in the study, six dropped following the intervention. The awareness regarding the Class A questionnaire was good in most physicians (60%), nurses (60%), and pharmacists (57%) before the intervention, which improved postintervention, with physicians (80%), nurses (32%), and pharmacists (78%) demonstrating excellent awareness. The awareness level in the Class B questionnaire was also improved to excellent in most physicians (70%), pharmacists (85%), and nurses (85%) following the intervention, while it was excellent only in 50%, 35%, and 1% of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses, respectively, preintervention. In the Class C questionnaire, most physicians (40%) and nurses (60%) had good awareness, while pharmacists (35%) demonstrated excellent awareness preintervention. Postintervention, most physicians (70%), nurses (77%), and pharmacists (64%) exhibited excellent awareness.ConclusionMost oncology practice HCPs demonstrate a good to average level of awareness regarding MEs. Clinical pharmacists' educational interventions can significantly enhance awareness among HCPs concerning MEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241235898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionMedication errors (MEs) are preventable incidents that can result in harm to patients. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to be well-informed about MEs. This study aims to assess the awareness levels of HCPs and the impact of educational intervention on their understanding of MEs.MethodsResponses to a 17-question structured, self-administered questionnaire assessing the awareness of HCPs regarding fundamental aspects of MEs, ME reporting systems, and their ability to make recommendations for improving the system for handling the MEs were collected both before and after two weeks of educational intervention administration.ResultsOf a total of 114 HCPs who initially participated in the study, six dropped following the intervention. The awareness regarding the Class A questionnaire was good in most physicians (60%), nurses (60%), and pharmacists (57%) before the intervention, which improved postintervention, with physicians (80%), nurses (32%), and pharmacists (78%) demonstrating excellent awareness. The awareness level in the Class B questionnaire was also improved to excellent in most physicians (70%), pharmacists (85%), and nurses (85%) following the intervention, while it was excellent only in 50%, 35%, and 1% of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses, respectively, preintervention. In the Class C questionnaire, most physicians (40%) and nurses (60%) had good awareness, while pharmacists (35%) demonstrated excellent awareness preintervention. Postintervention, most physicians (70%), nurses (77%), and pharmacists (64%) exhibited excellent awareness.ConclusionMost oncology practice HCPs demonstrate a good to average level of awareness regarding MEs. Clinical pharmacists' educational interventions can significantly enhance awareness among HCPs concerning MEs.

研究评估一家癌症医院医护人员对用药错误的认识以及教育干预措施的影响。
导言:用药错误(ME)是一种可预防的事故,可能会对患者造成伤害。因此,医护人员必须充分了解用药错误。本研究旨在评估医护人员对用药错误的认识水平以及教育干预对他们了解用药错误的影响:方法:在教育干预实施前和实施两周后,收集对17个问题的结构化自填问卷的答复,以评估保健医生对MEs基本方面、ME报告系统的认识,以及他们就改进MEs处理系统提出建议的能力:在最初参与研究的 114 名保健医生中,有 6 人在干预后放弃了研究。干预前,大多数医生(60%)、护士(60%)和药剂师(57%)对 A 类问卷的认知度较好,干预后有所改善,医生(80%)、护士(32%)和药剂师(78%)的认知度都非常高。干预后,大多数医生(70%)、药剂师(85%)和护士(85%)对 B 级问卷的认知水平也提高到了优秀,而干预前分别只有 50%、35% 和 1%的医生、药剂师和护士的认知水平为优秀。在 C 级问卷中,大多数医生(40%)和护士(60%)在干预前的认知度为良好,而药剂师(35%)的认知度为优秀。干预后,大多数医生(70%)、护士(77%)和药剂师(64%)表现出良好的意识:结论:大多数肿瘤科从业人员对 ME 的认识水平为良好至一般。临床药剂师的教育干预可以显著提高从业人员对 MEs 的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信