Predictors of True Scaphoid Fractures in Children.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1177/15589447241231311
Daniel Milad, Aneesh Karir, Kevin Smit, Sasha Carsen, Kevin Cheung
{"title":"Predictors of True Scaphoid Fractures in Children.","authors":"Daniel Milad, Aneesh Karir, Kevin Smit, Sasha Carsen, Kevin Cheung","doi":"10.1177/15589447241231311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The scaphoid is the most commonly fractured carpal bone in children. True scaphoid fractures have proven to be difficult to diagnose, as they may not be apparent on initial imaging. Children with clinical suspicion of a scaphoid fracture may be treated with continued immobilization, even in the absence of radiographic evidence of a fracture. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of true scaphoid fractures in children to help guide management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective cohort study of children presenting to a tertiary pediatric hospital with hand or wrist injuries. Patients were grouped based on the presence of a true scaphoid fractures (confirmed on imaging) or those with clinical suspicion of a scaphoid fracture alone (no radiographic evidence of fracture). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared with univariate and multivariate statistics to identify fracture predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty patients were included in the study: 57 in the true scaphoid fracture group and 73 in the clinical scaphoid fracture group. Patients with a true scaphoid fracture were older than those with a clinical scaphoid fracture (median age [interquartile range], 14.2 [13.0-15.4] vs 12.9 [11.9-14.4], <i>P</i> = .01). Men were more likely to sustain a true scaphoid fracture (65.0% vs 35.0%, <i>P</i> = .01). Older age and male sex were shown to be independent predictors of true scaphoid fractures (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.25 [1.03-1.50] and 2.93 [1.39-6.17], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the pediatric population, older age and male children may be at increased risk of true scaphoid fractures. This may help guide decisions surrounding further imaging and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"706-710"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241231311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The scaphoid is the most commonly fractured carpal bone in children. True scaphoid fractures have proven to be difficult to diagnose, as they may not be apparent on initial imaging. Children with clinical suspicion of a scaphoid fracture may be treated with continued immobilization, even in the absence of radiographic evidence of a fracture. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of true scaphoid fractures in children to help guide management.

Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study of children presenting to a tertiary pediatric hospital with hand or wrist injuries. Patients were grouped based on the presence of a true scaphoid fractures (confirmed on imaging) or those with clinical suspicion of a scaphoid fracture alone (no radiographic evidence of fracture). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared with univariate and multivariate statistics to identify fracture predictors.

Results: One hundred and thirty patients were included in the study: 57 in the true scaphoid fracture group and 73 in the clinical scaphoid fracture group. Patients with a true scaphoid fracture were older than those with a clinical scaphoid fracture (median age [interquartile range], 14.2 [13.0-15.4] vs 12.9 [11.9-14.4], P = .01). Men were more likely to sustain a true scaphoid fracture (65.0% vs 35.0%, P = .01). Older age and male sex were shown to be independent predictors of true scaphoid fractures (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.25 [1.03-1.50] and 2.93 [1.39-6.17], respectively).

Conclusions: In the pediatric population, older age and male children may be at increased risk of true scaphoid fractures. This may help guide decisions surrounding further imaging and treatment.

儿童真性肩胛骨骨折的预测因素
背景:肩胛骨是儿童最常见的腕骨骨折:肩胛骨是儿童最常见的腕骨骨折。事实证明,真正的肩胛骨骨折很难诊断,因为在最初的影像学检查中可能并不明显。临床上怀疑有肩胛骨骨折的儿童可能会继续接受固定治疗,即使没有骨折的影像学证据。本研究旨在确定儿童真正肩胛骨骨折的预测因素,以帮助指导治疗:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在一家三级儿科医院就诊的手部或腕部受伤儿童。根据是否存在真正的肩胛骨骨折(影像学证实)或仅临床怀疑肩胛骨骨折(无骨折的影像学证据)对患者进行分组。通过单变量和多变量统计对人口统计学和临床特征进行比较,以确定骨折预测因素:研究共纳入 130 名患者:结果:研究共纳入 130 名患者:57 人属于真正肩胛骨骨折组,73 人属于临床肩胛骨骨折组。真正肩胛骨骨折患者的年龄大于临床肩胛骨骨折患者(中位年龄[四分位距],14.2 [13.0-15.4] vs 12.9 [11.9-14.4],P = .01)。男性更容易发生真正的肩胛骨骨折(65.0% vs 35.0%,P = .01)。年龄较大和男性是真正肩胛骨骨折的独立预测因素(几率比[95%置信区间]分别为1.25 [1.03-1.50]和2.93 [1.39-6.17]):在儿科人群中,年龄较大和男性儿童发生真正肩胛骨骨折的风险可能会增加。结论:在儿童群体中,年龄较大和男性儿童发生真正肩胛骨骨折的风险可能会增加,这可能有助于指导有关进一步成像和治疗的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信