Superiority of model predictive control with robust and stable approach for sliding wheeled mobile systems in the presence of obstacles

Moharam Habibnejad Korayem, Fateme Namdarpour, Naeim Yousefi Lademakhi
{"title":"Superiority of model predictive control with robust and stable approach for sliding wheeled mobile systems in the presence of obstacles","authors":"Moharam Habibnejad Korayem, Fateme Namdarpour, Naeim Yousefi Lademakhi","doi":"10.1002/oca.3107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present two distinct linear Model Predictive Control (MPC) methods for controlling mobile robots in the presence of obstacles while considering the wheel slip. Predictability of the controller enables the robot to automatically choose an alternative path to avoid obstacles. However, environmental conditions and disturbances, including slip, may impact the system model. Therefore, to accurately represent the system, slip angle and slip ratio are factored into the modeling process. Then the kinematic model is linearized using the successive method to reduce computational cost. Next, both Stable MPC (SMPC) and Robust MPC have been designed and implemented on the linearized time-variant model to control the robot. The superiority of the robust predictive control method over the stable method has been discussed in terms of safety and optimal performance considering wheel slip. Finally, based on experimental tests, it has been found that the robust predictive controller is more effective than stable control when the surface is slippery and there is an obstacle in front of the robot. However, in a case where the wheel slip is neglectable, SMPC can be a better choice in presence of obstacles due to the lower computational cost.","PeriodicalId":501055,"journal":{"name":"Optimal Control Applications and Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimal Control Applications and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.3107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we present two distinct linear Model Predictive Control (MPC) methods for controlling mobile robots in the presence of obstacles while considering the wheel slip. Predictability of the controller enables the robot to automatically choose an alternative path to avoid obstacles. However, environmental conditions and disturbances, including slip, may impact the system model. Therefore, to accurately represent the system, slip angle and slip ratio are factored into the modeling process. Then the kinematic model is linearized using the successive method to reduce computational cost. Next, both Stable MPC (SMPC) and Robust MPC have been designed and implemented on the linearized time-variant model to control the robot. The superiority of the robust predictive control method over the stable method has been discussed in terms of safety and optimal performance considering wheel slip. Finally, based on experimental tests, it has been found that the robust predictive controller is more effective than stable control when the surface is slippery and there is an obstacle in front of the robot. However, in a case where the wheel slip is neglectable, SMPC can be a better choice in presence of obstacles due to the lower computational cost.

Abstract Image

在有障碍物的情况下,采用鲁棒和稳定方法对滑动轮式移动系统进行模型预测控制的优越性
在本文中,我们提出了两种不同的线性模型预测控制(MPC)方法,用于在存在障碍物的情况下控制移动机器人,同时考虑车轮打滑问题。控制器的可预测性使机器人能够自动选择替代路径以避开障碍物。然而,环境条件和干扰(包括打滑)可能会影响系统模型。因此,为了准确表示系统,在建模过程中要考虑滑移角和滑移率。然后使用连续法对运动模型进行线性化处理,以降低计算成本。接下来,在线性化的时变模型上设计并实现了稳定型 MPC(SMPC)和鲁棒性 MPC,以控制机器人。讨论了鲁棒预测控制方法在安全性和考虑车轮打滑的最佳性能方面优于稳定方法。最后,根据实验测试发现,当路面湿滑且机器人前方有障碍物时,鲁棒预测控制器比稳定控制更有效。然而,在车轮打滑可忽略的情况下,由于计算成本较低,SMPC 在有障碍物的情况下可能是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信