Filter-based Stance Network for Rumor Verification

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jun Li, Yi Bin, Yunshan Ma, Yang Yang, Zi Huang, Tat-Seng Chua
{"title":"Filter-based Stance Network for Rumor Verification","authors":"Jun Li, Yi Bin, Yunshan Ma, Yang Yang, Zi Huang, Tat-Seng Chua","doi":"10.1145/3649462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rumor verification on social media aims to identify the truth value of a rumor, which is important to decrease the detrimental public effects. A rumor might arouse heated discussions and replies, conveying different stances of users that could be helpful in identifying the rumor. Thus, several works have been proposed to verify a rumor by modelling its entire stance sequence in the time domain. However, these works ignore that such a stance sequence could be decomposed into controversies with different intensities, which could be used to cluster the stance sequences with the same consensus. Besides, the existing stance extractors fail to consider both the impact of all the previously posted tweets and the reply chain on obtaining the stance of a new reply. To address the above problems, in this paper, we propose a novel stance-based network to aggregate the controversies of the stance sequence for rumor verification, termed Filter-based Stance Network (FSNet). As controversies with different intensities are reflected as the different changes of stances, it is convenient to represent different controversies in the frequency domain, but it is hard in the time domain. Our proposed FSNet decomposes the stance sequence into multiple controversies in the frequency domain and obtains the weighted aggregation of them. In specific, FSNet consists of two modules: the stance extractor and the filter block. To obtain better stance features toward the source, the stance extractor contains two stages. In the first stage, the tweet representation of each reply is obtained by aggregating information from all previously posted tweets in a conversation. Then, the features of stance toward the source, <i>i.e.</i>, rumor-aware stance, are extracted with the reply chains in the second stage. In the filter block module, a rumor-aware stance sequence is constructed by sorting all the tweets of a conversation in chronological order. Fourier Transform thereafter is employed to convert the stance sequence into the frequency domain, where different frequency components reflect controversies of different intensities. Finally, a frequency filter is applied to explore the different contributions of controversies. We supervise our FSNet with both stance labels and rumor labels to strengthen the relations between rumor veracity and crowd stances. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that our model substantially outperforms all the baselines.</p>","PeriodicalId":50936,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3649462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rumor verification on social media aims to identify the truth value of a rumor, which is important to decrease the detrimental public effects. A rumor might arouse heated discussions and replies, conveying different stances of users that could be helpful in identifying the rumor. Thus, several works have been proposed to verify a rumor by modelling its entire stance sequence in the time domain. However, these works ignore that such a stance sequence could be decomposed into controversies with different intensities, which could be used to cluster the stance sequences with the same consensus. Besides, the existing stance extractors fail to consider both the impact of all the previously posted tweets and the reply chain on obtaining the stance of a new reply. To address the above problems, in this paper, we propose a novel stance-based network to aggregate the controversies of the stance sequence for rumor verification, termed Filter-based Stance Network (FSNet). As controversies with different intensities are reflected as the different changes of stances, it is convenient to represent different controversies in the frequency domain, but it is hard in the time domain. Our proposed FSNet decomposes the stance sequence into multiple controversies in the frequency domain and obtains the weighted aggregation of them. In specific, FSNet consists of two modules: the stance extractor and the filter block. To obtain better stance features toward the source, the stance extractor contains two stages. In the first stage, the tweet representation of each reply is obtained by aggregating information from all previously posted tweets in a conversation. Then, the features of stance toward the source, i.e., rumor-aware stance, are extracted with the reply chains in the second stage. In the filter block module, a rumor-aware stance sequence is constructed by sorting all the tweets of a conversation in chronological order. Fourier Transform thereafter is employed to convert the stance sequence into the frequency domain, where different frequency components reflect controversies of different intensities. Finally, a frequency filter is applied to explore the different contributions of controversies. We supervise our FSNet with both stance labels and rumor labels to strengthen the relations between rumor veracity and crowd stances. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that our model substantially outperforms all the baselines.

基于过滤器的谣言验证立场网络
社交媒体上的谣言验证旨在识别谣言的真实价值,这对减少有害的公众影响非常重要。谣言可能会引起激烈的讨论和回复,传递出用户的不同立场,这可能有助于识别谣言。因此,有几项研究提出通过在时域中模拟谣言的整个立场序列来验证谣言。然而,这些工作忽略了这样一个立场序列可以分解成不同强度的争议,而这些争议可以用来聚类具有相同共识的立场序列。此外,现有的立场提取器未能同时考虑之前发布的所有推文和回复链对获取新回复立场的影响。针对上述问题,我们在本文中提出了一种新颖的基于立场的网络来聚合立场序列的争议,用于谣言验证,称为基于过滤器的立场网络(FSNet)。由于不同强度的争议反映为不同的立场变化,因此在频域表示不同的争议很方便,但在时域表示却很困难。我们提出的 FSNet 将立场序列分解为频域中的多个争议,并得到它们的加权聚合。具体而言,FSNet 由两个模块组成:立场提取器和过滤块。为了更好地获得针对来源的立场特征,立场提取器包括两个阶段。在第一阶段,通过汇总对话中所有先前发布的推文信息,获得每个回复的推文表示。然后,在第二阶段利用回复链提取对消息来源的立场特征,即谣言感知立场。在过滤块模块中,按照时间顺序对对话中的所有推文进行排序,从而构建出谣言感知立场序列。之后,采用傅立叶变换将立场序列转换为频域,其中不同的频率成分反映了不同强度的争议。最后,应用频率滤波器来探索争议的不同贡献。我们利用立场标签和谣言标签对 FSNet 进行监督,以加强谣言真实性与人群立场之间的关系。在两个基准数据集上进行的广泛实验表明,我们的模型大大优于所有基线模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
165
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; accounts of applications of existing information retrieval techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques; formalization of new information retrieval or information seeking tasks and of methods for evaluating the performance on those tasks; development of content (text, image, speech, video, etc) analysis methods to support information retrieval and information seeking; development of computational models of user information preferences and interaction behaviors; creation and analysis of evaluation methodologies for information retrieval and information seeking; or surveys of existing work that propose a significant synthesis. The information retrieval scope of ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) appeals to industry practitioners for its wealth of creative ideas, and to academic researchers for its descriptions of their colleagues'' work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信