Changes in opioid prescribing and prescription drug monitoring program utilization following electronic health record integration—Massachusetts, 2018

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae012
Brian Corry, Laura J Cremer, Christopher Donnelly, Wesley M Sargent, Jamie Mells, Rodd Kelly, Joshua Reynolds, Leonard D Young
{"title":"Changes in opioid prescribing and prescription drug monitoring program utilization following electronic health record integration—Massachusetts, 2018","authors":"Brian Corry, Laura J Cremer, Christopher Donnelly, Wesley M Sargent, Jamie Mells, Rodd Kelly, Joshua Reynolds, Leonard D Young","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective In this study we explored key prescription drug monitoring program-related outcomes among clinicians from a broad cohort of Massachusetts healthcare facilities following prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) and electronic health record (EHR) data integration. Methods Outcomes included 7-day rolling averages of opioids prescribed, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed, and PDMP queries. We employed a longitudinal study design to analyze PDMP data over a 15-month study period which allowed for six and a half months of pre- and post-integration observations surrounding a two-month integration period. We used longitudinal mixed effects models to examine the effect of EHR integration on each of the key outcomes. Results Following EHR integration, PDMP queries increased both through the web-based portal and in total (0.037, [95% CI = 0.017, 0.057] and 0.056, [95% CI = 0.035, 0.077]). Both measures of clinician opioid prescribing declined throughout the study period; however no significant effect following EHR integration was observed. These results were consistent when our analysis was applied to a subset consisting only of continuous PDMP users. Conclusions Our results support EHR integration contributing to PDMP utilization by clinicians but do not support changes in opioid prescribing behavior.","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective In this study we explored key prescription drug monitoring program-related outcomes among clinicians from a broad cohort of Massachusetts healthcare facilities following prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) and electronic health record (EHR) data integration. Methods Outcomes included 7-day rolling averages of opioids prescribed, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed, and PDMP queries. We employed a longitudinal study design to analyze PDMP data over a 15-month study period which allowed for six and a half months of pre- and post-integration observations surrounding a two-month integration period. We used longitudinal mixed effects models to examine the effect of EHR integration on each of the key outcomes. Results Following EHR integration, PDMP queries increased both through the web-based portal and in total (0.037, [95% CI = 0.017, 0.057] and 0.056, [95% CI = 0.035, 0.077]). Both measures of clinician opioid prescribing declined throughout the study period; however no significant effect following EHR integration was observed. These results were consistent when our analysis was applied to a subset consisting only of continuous PDMP users. Conclusions Our results support EHR integration contributing to PDMP utilization by clinicians but do not support changes in opioid prescribing behavior.
电子病历整合后阿片类药物处方和处方药监控计划使用情况的变化--马萨诸塞州,2018 年
目的 在本研究中,我们探讨了马萨诸塞州众多医疗机构的临床医生在处方药监控计划(PDMP)和电子病历(EHR)数据整合后与处方药监控计划相关的主要结果。方法 结果包括阿片类药物处方量、吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)处方量和 PDMP 查询量的 7 天滚动平均值。我们采用了纵向研究设计来分析 15 个月研究期间的 PDMP 数据,这样就有了围绕两个月整合期的六个半月的整合前和整合后观察。我们使用纵向混合效应模型来研究电子病历整合对各项关键结果的影响。结果 EHR 整合后,通过基于网络的门户网站进行的 PDMP 查询次数和总查询次数均有所增加(0.037,[95% CI = 0.017,0.057] 和 0.056,[95% CI = 0.035,0.077])。在整个研究期间,临床医生开具阿片类药物处方的两项指标均有所下降;但在整合电子病历后,未观察到明显效果。当我们对仅包括 PDMP 连续用户的子集进行分析时,这些结果是一致的。结论 我们的研究结果表明,电子病历整合有助于临床医生利用 PDMP,但不支持阿片类药物处方行为的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信