Are Clinical Prediction Rules Used in Spinal Cord Injury Care? A Survey of Practice

Rowan H. Boyles, Caroline M. Alexander, A. Belsi, P. Strutton
{"title":"Are Clinical Prediction Rules Used in Spinal Cord Injury Care? A Survey of Practice","authors":"Rowan H. Boyles, Caroline M. Alexander, A. Belsi, P. Strutton","doi":"10.46292/sci23-00069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Accurate outcome prediction is desirable post spinal cord injury (SCI), reducing uncertainty for patients and supporting personalized treatments. Numerous attempts have been made to create clinical prediction rules that identify patients who are likely to recover function. It is unknown to what extent these rules are routinely used in clinical practice.\n \n \n \n To better understand knowledge of, and attitudes toward, clinical prediction rules amongst SCI clinicians in the United Kingdom.\n \n \n \n An online survey was distributed via mailing lists of clinical special interest groups and relevant National Health Service Trusts. Respondents answered questions about their knowledge of existing clinical prediction rules and their general attitudes to using them. They also provided information about their level of experience with SCI patients.\n \n \n \n One hundred SCI clinicians completed the survey. The majority (71%) were unaware of clinical prediction rules for SCI; only 8% reported using them in clinical practice. Less experienced clinicians were less likely to be aware. Lack of familiarity with prediction rules was reported as being a barrier to their use. The importance of clinical expertise when making prognostic decisions was emphasized. All respondents reported interest in using clinical prediction rules in the future.\n \n \n \n The results show widespread lack of awareness of clinical prediction rules amongst SCI clinicians in the United Kingdom. However, clinicians were positive about the potential for clinical prediction rules to support decision-making. More focus should be directed toward refining current rules and improving dissemination within the SCI community.\n","PeriodicalId":507086,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"33 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-00069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate outcome prediction is desirable post spinal cord injury (SCI), reducing uncertainty for patients and supporting personalized treatments. Numerous attempts have been made to create clinical prediction rules that identify patients who are likely to recover function. It is unknown to what extent these rules are routinely used in clinical practice. To better understand knowledge of, and attitudes toward, clinical prediction rules amongst SCI clinicians in the United Kingdom. An online survey was distributed via mailing lists of clinical special interest groups and relevant National Health Service Trusts. Respondents answered questions about their knowledge of existing clinical prediction rules and their general attitudes to using them. They also provided information about their level of experience with SCI patients. One hundred SCI clinicians completed the survey. The majority (71%) were unaware of clinical prediction rules for SCI; only 8% reported using them in clinical practice. Less experienced clinicians were less likely to be aware. Lack of familiarity with prediction rules was reported as being a barrier to their use. The importance of clinical expertise when making prognostic decisions was emphasized. All respondents reported interest in using clinical prediction rules in the future. The results show widespread lack of awareness of clinical prediction rules amongst SCI clinicians in the United Kingdom. However, clinicians were positive about the potential for clinical prediction rules to support decision-making. More focus should be directed toward refining current rules and improving dissemination within the SCI community.
脊髓损伤护理中是否使用临床预测规则?实践调查
脊髓损伤(SCI)后患者需要准确的结果预测,以减少患者的不确定性并支持个性化治疗。人们曾多次尝试创建临床预测规则,以确定哪些患者有可能恢复功能。目前尚不清楚这些规则在临床实践中的常规使用程度。 为了更好地了解英国 SCI 临床医生对临床预测规则的认识和态度。 我们通过临床特殊兴趣小组和相关国民健康服务信托基金的邮件列表发布了一份在线调查。受访者回答了他们对现有临床预测规则的了解程度以及使用这些规则的总体态度等问题。他们还提供了有关其对 SCI 患者的经验水平的信息。 100 名 SCI 临床医生完成了调查。大多数医生(71%)不了解 SCI 临床预测规则;只有 8% 的医生表示在临床实践中使用过这些规则。经验较少的临床医生更不可能了解这些规则。据报告,不熟悉预测规则是使用这些规则的障碍。受访者强调在做出预后决定时临床专业知识的重要性。所有受访者都表示有兴趣在未来使用临床预测规则。 结果显示,英国 SCI 临床医生普遍缺乏对临床预测规则的认识。不过,临床医生对临床预测规则支持决策的潜力持肯定态度。应将更多精力放在完善现有规则和改进 SCI 社区内的传播上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信