Important Role of Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Carbonization in a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy: A Brief Literature Review

Eira Jansson, Malin Kjell, Karin Ålund
{"title":"Important Role of Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Carbonization in a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy: A Brief Literature Review","authors":"Eira Jansson, Malin Kjell, Karin Ålund","doi":"10.21697/seb.5805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a brief but focused literature review of articles centered around pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) using various feedstocks, including residues from industries, agriculture, and landfill waste. The deployment of bio-wastes will be the cornerstone of circular bio-economies in the future. The main emphasis is on gleaning how these two technologies can contribute to a sustainable circular (bio) economy, by understanding the process parameters influencing the quality, type and quantity of the final output. HTC and pyrolysis, it may be undeniably stated, can support the progress towards a clutch of sustainable development goals (SDGs), as they operate right at the confluence of solid waste management and renewable energy production. As mentioned in many of the articles reviewed in this paper,  a high process temperature usually results in higher yields of bio-oil and biogas/pyrogas (and thereby less biochar), implying a  higher energy recovery. HTC trumps pyrolysis on many counts – economy, energy-efficiency and product (hydrochar) quality.  However, pyrolysis is a simpler method to regulate, and pyrochar, has a higher market value vis-à-vis hydrochar. While both these technologies generate valuable end-products regardless of the type of feedstock used; the articles reviewed clearly show that the feedstock does influence the quality of the output and thereby the application to which it can be directed. The review leads to recommendations for future research in collecting data and creating a model to investigate various process parameters. Some of these recommendations are detailed comparative life cycle assessments (LCAs) to study the environmental impacts of  technology-choices, , research into tailoring the  optimal method and temperature to the feedstock deployed, and comprehensive  forecast-based economic analysis of commercial-scale pyrolysis and HTC projects, are called for. As stated at the beginning, this is a brief review, which can also be expanded to take more published articles into its fold.","PeriodicalId":508523,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a brief but focused literature review of articles centered around pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) using various feedstocks, including residues from industries, agriculture, and landfill waste. The deployment of bio-wastes will be the cornerstone of circular bio-economies in the future. The main emphasis is on gleaning how these two technologies can contribute to a sustainable circular (bio) economy, by understanding the process parameters influencing the quality, type and quantity of the final output. HTC and pyrolysis, it may be undeniably stated, can support the progress towards a clutch of sustainable development goals (SDGs), as they operate right at the confluence of solid waste management and renewable energy production. As mentioned in many of the articles reviewed in this paper,  a high process temperature usually results in higher yields of bio-oil and biogas/pyrogas (and thereby less biochar), implying a  higher energy recovery. HTC trumps pyrolysis on many counts – economy, energy-efficiency and product (hydrochar) quality.  However, pyrolysis is a simpler method to regulate, and pyrochar, has a higher market value vis-à-vis hydrochar. While both these technologies generate valuable end-products regardless of the type of feedstock used; the articles reviewed clearly show that the feedstock does influence the quality of the output and thereby the application to which it can be directed. The review leads to recommendations for future research in collecting data and creating a model to investigate various process parameters. Some of these recommendations are detailed comparative life cycle assessments (LCAs) to study the environmental impacts of  technology-choices, , research into tailoring the  optimal method and temperature to the feedstock deployed, and comprehensive  forecast-based economic analysis of commercial-scale pyrolysis and HTC projects, are called for. As stated at the beginning, this is a brief review, which can also be expanded to take more published articles into its fold.
热解和热液碳化在可持续循环生物经济中的重要作用:文献综述
这是一篇简短但重点突出的文献综述,主要围绕使用各种原料(包括工业、农业和垃圾填埋场的残留物)进行热解和水热碳化(HTC)的文章。生物废料的利用将是未来循环生物经济的基石。主要重点是通过了解影响最终产出的质量、类型和数量的工艺参数,了解这两种技术如何为可持续的循环(生物)经济做出贡献。不可否认的是,热能回收技术和热解技术可以为实现一系列可持续发展目标(SDGs)提供支持,因为这两项技术正处于固体废物管理和可再生能源生产的交汇点。正如本文评述的许多文章所提到的,工艺温度高通常会产生更多的生物油和生物气/焦油(从而减少生物炭),这意味着能源回收率更高。从经济性、能源效率和产品(水炭)质量等多个方面来看,氢化炭化技术都优于热解技术。 不过,热解是一种更容易调节的方法,而且热炭的市场价值高于水炭。虽然这两种技术无论使用哪种原料都能产生有价值的最终产品,但所审查的文章清楚地表明,原料确实会影响产出的质量,从而影响其应用。综述为今后的研究提出了建议,即收集数据和创建模型以研究各种工艺参数。其中一些建议包括:进行详细的生命周期比较评估(LCA),以研究技术选择对环境的影响;研究如何根据所使用的原料确定最佳方法和温度;以及对商业规模的热解和 HTC 项目进行全面的基于预测的经济分析。如开头所述,这只是一篇简短的综述,还可以扩展到更多已发表的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信