Qualitative research to advance social norms initiatives of the RHRA: Mombasa County, HAKI Jamii, and the RHRA Study

Peter Igogo, Carol Odula
{"title":"Qualitative research to advance social norms initiatives of the RHRA: Mombasa County, HAKI Jamii, and the RHRA Study","authors":"Peter Igogo, Carol Odula","doi":"10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBackground: In Kenya, there is a general lack of knowledge on the prevention of unintended pregnancies, especially among the rural poor and women living in urban and peri-urban informal settlements. Unsafe abortion is common, and stigma directed at the woman, provider, woman’s family, and facility is common.\nObjective: To explore public perceptions of abortion, gather awareness of the legal provisions for abortion, and determine access to information and services.\nMethods: Qualitative in-depth research used four focus groups of women and men aged 18-54 years. The interactions were face-to-face and verbatim transcripts. The messages were organized, coded, and categorized into three categories using the delve software. Coding followed a mix of deductive and inductive processes.\nResults: There were highly resistant views on abortion across all four groups, focusing mainly on potential complications and death. Emerging voices support termination for rape, defilement, and incest. Abortion occurs more often among married women than among girls. Regarding the legal provisions, safe abortion respondents said it was illegal yet legal. It can be kept secret and influenced by one’s religion. Barriers to safe abortion access included high cost and lack of knowledge of where services are available. However, unintended pregnancies were common in informal settlements, resulting from transactional sex, sex, and gender-based violence, and lack of knowledge of and access to contraception.\nConclusion: There is a need to unpack the collective social silence and the association of abortion with unpleasant social issues and to understand and target the drivers of abortion stigma, including premature death, future fertility concerns, guilt, and the murder label.","PeriodicalId":517202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","volume":"33 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Kenya, there is a general lack of knowledge on the prevention of unintended pregnancies, especially among the rural poor and women living in urban and peri-urban informal settlements. Unsafe abortion is common, and stigma directed at the woman, provider, woman’s family, and facility is common. Objective: To explore public perceptions of abortion, gather awareness of the legal provisions for abortion, and determine access to information and services. Methods: Qualitative in-depth research used four focus groups of women and men aged 18-54 years. The interactions were face-to-face and verbatim transcripts. The messages were organized, coded, and categorized into three categories using the delve software. Coding followed a mix of deductive and inductive processes. Results: There were highly resistant views on abortion across all four groups, focusing mainly on potential complications and death. Emerging voices support termination for rape, defilement, and incest. Abortion occurs more often among married women than among girls. Regarding the legal provisions, safe abortion respondents said it was illegal yet legal. It can be kept secret and influenced by one’s religion. Barriers to safe abortion access included high cost and lack of knowledge of where services are available. However, unintended pregnancies were common in informal settlements, resulting from transactional sex, sex, and gender-based violence, and lack of knowledge of and access to contraception. Conclusion: There is a need to unpack the collective social silence and the association of abortion with unpleasant social issues and to understand and target the drivers of abortion stigma, including premature death, future fertility concerns, guilt, and the murder label.
开展定性研究,推进《生殖健康和风险评估》的社会规范倡议:蒙巴萨县、HAKI Jamii 和《生殖健康和风险评估》研究
背景:在肯尼亚,人们普遍缺乏预防意外怀孕的知识,尤其是农村贫困人口和居住在城市及城市周边非正规居住区的妇女。不安全堕胎很常见,针对妇女、提供堕胎服务者、妇女家庭和堕胎设施的污名化现象也很普遍:探讨公众对堕胎的看法,收集对堕胎法律规定的认识,并确定获得信息和服务的途径:定性深入研究使用了四个焦点小组,成员包括 18-54 岁的女性和男性。互动是面对面的,并有逐字记录。使用 delve 软件对信息进行整理、编码,并分为三个类别。编码采用了演绎和归纳相结合的方法:所有四个小组都对堕胎持强烈抵制的观点,主要集中在潜在的并发症和死亡问题上。新出现的声音支持强奸、玷污和乱伦情况下的终止妊娠。已婚妇女的堕胎率高于少女。关于法律规定,安全堕胎的受访者表示,堕胎是非法的,但又是合法的。堕胎可以保密,并受个人宗教信仰的影响。安全堕胎的障碍包括费用高昂和不知道哪里可以提供服务。然而,在非正规居住区,由于性交易、性暴力和性别暴力,以及缺乏避孕知识和避孕途径,意外怀孕很常见:有必要打破社会的集体沉默,将堕胎与令人不快的社会问题联系起来,并了解堕胎耻辱化的驱动因素,包括过早死亡、对未来生育的担忧、负罪感和谋杀标签,并将其作为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信