Digital twins in the asset lifecycle: are we there yet?

David Whitmore, I. Krystallis, Eleni Papadonikolaki, Jordan Ford, Matt Cleaver, David Alexander
{"title":"Digital twins in the asset lifecycle: are we there yet?","authors":"David Whitmore, I. Krystallis, Eleni Papadonikolaki, Jordan Ford, Matt Cleaver, David Alexander","doi":"10.1680/jmapl.23.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An academic-industry team present the results of research conducted into the current benefits being derived from the use of digital twins across the entire life cycle of an asset. We reviewed the benefits being derived by the asset management community as this is where through life productivity and effectiveness benefits will be realised. We conducted a review of relevant literature, surveyed 122 practitioners and worked with our industry partner and the UK professional body to validate our conclusions. Specifically, (1) We examined the current application of digital twins in three industry sectors: Process industries; Infrastructure (Civil Engineering); and Manufacturing. (2) We grouped our data according to role types, i.e., professionals working predominantly in the design and build, and professionals in the operation and maintenance part of the lifecycle. As regards the sector results, we found the responses contradictory. When we control by role type, the results are more cohesive. Individuals involved in the operation and maintenance stages consistently indicated that digital twins are not delivering to their promise. We present a series of problem statements to define the current state, together with some managerial recommendations and we propose further work to establish detailed guidance for infrastructure sector projects.","PeriodicalId":517247,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law","volume":"53 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.23.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An academic-industry team present the results of research conducted into the current benefits being derived from the use of digital twins across the entire life cycle of an asset. We reviewed the benefits being derived by the asset management community as this is where through life productivity and effectiveness benefits will be realised. We conducted a review of relevant literature, surveyed 122 practitioners and worked with our industry partner and the UK professional body to validate our conclusions. Specifically, (1) We examined the current application of digital twins in three industry sectors: Process industries; Infrastructure (Civil Engineering); and Manufacturing. (2) We grouped our data according to role types, i.e., professionals working predominantly in the design and build, and professionals in the operation and maintenance part of the lifecycle. As regards the sector results, we found the responses contradictory. When we control by role type, the results are more cohesive. Individuals involved in the operation and maintenance stages consistently indicated that digital twins are not delivering to their promise. We present a series of problem statements to define the current state, together with some managerial recommendations and we propose further work to establish detailed guidance for infrastructure sector projects.
资产生命周期中的数字双胞胎:我们到了吗?
一个学术和行业团队展示了对当前在资产整个生命周期内使用数字孪生所产生的效益进行研究的结果。我们审查了资产管理界正在获得的效益,因为这正是实现整个生命周期的生产力和效益的地方。我们查阅了相关文献,调查了 122 名从业人员,并与行业合作伙伴和英国专业机构合作,以验证我们的结论。具体来说,(1) 我们研究了当前数字孪生在三个行业领域的应用:流程工业、基础设施(土木工程)和制造业。(2) 我们根据角色类型对数据进行了分组,即主要从事设计和建造工作的专业人员,以及在生命周期中从事运营和维护工作的专业人员。关于部门结果,我们发现答复相互矛盾。当我们按角色类型进行控制时,结果更加一致。参与运行和维护阶段的人员一致表示,数字孪生没有兑现其承诺。我们提出了一系列问题陈述,以确定当前的状况,同时提出了一些管理建议,并建议进一步开展工作,为基础设施部门的项目制定详细的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信