Views and opinions of farmers and consumers on the trajectory of agriculture in times of military conflict: insights from a Q-study in Germany

Q open Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoae005
Marlene E Noack, Florian Tietjens, Uwe Latacz-Lohmann
{"title":"Views and opinions of farmers and consumers on the trajectory of agriculture in times of military conflict: insights from a Q-study in Germany","authors":"Marlene E Noack, Florian Tietjens, Uwe Latacz-Lohmann","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoae005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After three decades of orienting agriculture towards ecological and social sustainability goals, the Ukraine war catapulted productivity and supply goals back onto the political agenda. Against this background, the present study aimed to establish how farmers and food consumers envision the future of agriculture. Application of Q-Methodology revealed three opinion groups for both farmers and consumers. In conclusion, the Ukraine war has not significantly shifted the balance between old and new societal demands on agriculture. Old discrepancies in the views of farmers and the non-farming population persist. While among the farmers surveyed the group of those who adhere to “business as usual” predominates, there is no group among the consumers surveyed who share this view. Rather, there is a majority desire among consumers for the sector to continue to be aligned with sustainability goals. Security of supply is only an issue for a small proportion of the consumers surveyed.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After three decades of orienting agriculture towards ecological and social sustainability goals, the Ukraine war catapulted productivity and supply goals back onto the political agenda. Against this background, the present study aimed to establish how farmers and food consumers envision the future of agriculture. Application of Q-Methodology revealed three opinion groups for both farmers and consumers. In conclusion, the Ukraine war has not significantly shifted the balance between old and new societal demands on agriculture. Old discrepancies in the views of farmers and the non-farming population persist. While among the farmers surveyed the group of those who adhere to “business as usual” predominates, there is no group among the consumers surveyed who share this view. Rather, there is a majority desire among consumers for the sector to continue to be aligned with sustainability goals. Security of supply is only an issue for a small proportion of the consumers surveyed.
农民和消费者对军事冲突时期农业发展轨迹的看法和意见:德国一项 Q 研究的启示
三十年来,农业一直以生态和社会可持续发展目标为导向,乌克兰战争使生产率和供应目标重新提上了政治议程。在此背景下,本研究旨在确定农民和食品消费者如何看待农业的未来。应用 Q 方法揭示了农民和消费者的三个意见群体。总之,乌克兰战争并没有明显改变社会对农业的新旧需求之间的平衡。农民和非农业人口在观点上的旧差异依然存在。在接受调查的农民中,坚持 "一切照旧 "的人占多数,而在接受调查的消费者中,没有一个群体持相同观点。相反,大多数消费者希望该行业继续与可持续发展目标保持一致。对于一小部分受访消费者来说,供应安全只是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信