In Search of a More Balanced Engineering Curriculum: The Perspective of Students, Teachers, Alumni and Employers

Carla Ferreira, B. Gabriel, Robertt Valente, A. Andrade-Campos, J. Dias-de-Oliveira, V. Neto, Sandra C. Soares, Teresa Carvalho, Cláudia Figueiredo
{"title":"In Search of a More Balanced Engineering Curriculum: The Perspective of Students, Teachers, Alumni and Employers","authors":"Carla Ferreira, B. Gabriel, Robertt Valente, A. Andrade-Campos, J. Dias-de-Oliveira, V. Neto, Sandra C. Soares, Teresa Carvalho, Cláudia Figueiredo","doi":"10.3390/higheredu3010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to raise important issues in engineering education in the face of contemporary challenges and demands through the voices of different stakeholders in engineering curricula and in the practice of professional engineering. Several challenges and future perspectives are based on important skills, like soft skills, which are required by employers and include communication, decision-making, problem-solving, leadership and emotional intelligence, as well as the ability to work with people of different backgrounds and apply technical knowledge. A qualitative data analysis of interviews with students, alumni, teachers and employers revealed the demand for more balanced qualified curricula for higher education institutions in the field of engineering. This includes the promotion of collaborative learning spaces, authentic learning experiences based on engaging students in real situations, project-based learning, industrial visits, guest lectures and problem-solving methodologies that are perceived by these stakeholders as essential in the construction of a curriculum, in line with the specific technical competences of each area.","PeriodicalId":506902,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Higher Education","volume":"8 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to raise important issues in engineering education in the face of contemporary challenges and demands through the voices of different stakeholders in engineering curricula and in the practice of professional engineering. Several challenges and future perspectives are based on important skills, like soft skills, which are required by employers and include communication, decision-making, problem-solving, leadership and emotional intelligence, as well as the ability to work with people of different backgrounds and apply technical knowledge. A qualitative data analysis of interviews with students, alumni, teachers and employers revealed the demand for more balanced qualified curricula for higher education institutions in the field of engineering. This includes the promotion of collaborative learning spaces, authentic learning experiences based on engaging students in real situations, project-based learning, industrial visits, guest lectures and problem-solving methodologies that are perceived by these stakeholders as essential in the construction of a curriculum, in line with the specific technical competences of each area.
寻找更均衡的工程学课程:学生、教师、校友和雇主的视角
本文旨在通过工程学课程和专业工程学实践中不同利益相关方的声音,提出工程学教育 在面对当代挑战和需求时的重要问题。几项挑战和未来展望都基于重要的技能,如软技能,雇主所需的软技能包括沟通、决 策、解决问题、领导力和情商,以及与不同背景的人合作和应用技术知识的能力。通过对学生、校友、教师和雇主的访谈进行定性数据分析,发现工程学领域的高等院校需 要更加均衡的合格课程。这包括推广协作学习空间、基于学生参与真实情境的真实学习体验、基于项目的学 习、工业参观、客座讲座和解决问题的方法,这些被利益相关者视为课程建设中的关键, 符合每个领域的具体技术能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信