Cannabis and Anxiety: A Critical Review

Q1 Medicine
Alexander Beletsky, Cherry Liu, Bryson Lochte, Nebiyou K. Samuel, Igor Grant
{"title":"Cannabis and Anxiety: A Critical Review","authors":"Alexander Beletsky, Cherry Liu, Bryson Lochte, Nebiyou K. Samuel, Igor Grant","doi":"10.1159/000534855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Cannabis has been reported to have both anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects. Habitual cannabis use has been associated with anxiety disorders (AD). The causal pathways and mechanisms underlying the association between cannabis use (CU)/cannabis use disorder (CUD) and anxiety remain unclear. We examined the literature via a systematic review to investigate the link between cannabis and anxiety. The hypotheses studied include causality, the common factor theory, and the self-medication hypothesis. Methods Critical systematic review of published literature examining the relationship of CU/CUD to AD or state-anxiety, including case reports, literature reviews, observational studies, and preclinical and clinical studies. A systematic MEDline search was conducted of terms including: [anxiety], [anxiogenic], [anxiolytic], [PTSD], [OCD], [GAD], [cannabis], [marijuana], [tetrahydrocannabinol], [THC]. Results While several case-control and cohort studies have reported no correlation between CU/CUD and AD or state anxiety (N = 5), other cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies report significant relationships (N = 20). Meta-analysis supports anxiety correlating with CU (N = 15 studies, OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06–1.45, p = 0.006) or CUD (N = 13 studies, OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.23–2.31, p = 0.001). PATH analysis identifies the self-medication hypothesis (N = 8) as the model that best explains the association between CU/CUD and AD or state-anxiety. Despite the support of multiple large cohort studies, causal interpretations (N = 17) are less plausible, while the common factor theory (N = 5), stress-misattribution hypothesis, and reciprocal feedback theory lack substantial evidential support. Conclusion The association between cannabis and anxiety is best explained by anxiety predisposing individuals toward CU as a method of self-medication. A causal relationship in which CU causes AD incidence is less likely despite multiple longitudinal studies suggesting so.","PeriodicalId":18415,"journal":{"name":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","volume":"35 1","pages":"19 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Cannabis has been reported to have both anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects. Habitual cannabis use has been associated with anxiety disorders (AD). The causal pathways and mechanisms underlying the association between cannabis use (CU)/cannabis use disorder (CUD) and anxiety remain unclear. We examined the literature via a systematic review to investigate the link between cannabis and anxiety. The hypotheses studied include causality, the common factor theory, and the self-medication hypothesis. Methods Critical systematic review of published literature examining the relationship of CU/CUD to AD or state-anxiety, including case reports, literature reviews, observational studies, and preclinical and clinical studies. A systematic MEDline search was conducted of terms including: [anxiety], [anxiogenic], [anxiolytic], [PTSD], [OCD], [GAD], [cannabis], [marijuana], [tetrahydrocannabinol], [THC]. Results While several case-control and cohort studies have reported no correlation between CU/CUD and AD or state anxiety (N = 5), other cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies report significant relationships (N = 20). Meta-analysis supports anxiety correlating with CU (N = 15 studies, OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06–1.45, p = 0.006) or CUD (N = 13 studies, OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.23–2.31, p = 0.001). PATH analysis identifies the self-medication hypothesis (N = 8) as the model that best explains the association between CU/CUD and AD or state-anxiety. Despite the support of multiple large cohort studies, causal interpretations (N = 17) are less plausible, while the common factor theory (N = 5), stress-misattribution hypothesis, and reciprocal feedback theory lack substantial evidential support. Conclusion The association between cannabis and anxiety is best explained by anxiety predisposing individuals toward CU as a method of self-medication. A causal relationship in which CU causes AD incidence is less likely despite multiple longitudinal studies suggesting so.
大麻与焦虑:批判性评论
摘要 导言 据报道,大麻具有致焦虑和抗焦虑作用。习惯性使用大麻与焦虑症(AD)有关。大麻使用(CU)/大麻使用障碍(CUD)与焦虑之间的因果途径和机制仍不清楚。我们通过系统性综述研究了大麻与焦虑之间的联系。研究的假设包括因果关系、共同因素理论和自我治疗假设。方法 对已发表的研究 CU/CUD 与注意力缺失或状态焦虑之间关系的文献进行批判性系统综述,包括病例报告、文献综述、观察性研究以及临床前和临床研究。我们在 MEDline 上进行了系统性检索,检索词包括[焦虑]、[致焦虑]、[抗焦虑]、[创伤后应激障碍]、[强迫症]、[GAD]、[大麻]、[大麻]、[四氢大麻酚]、[THC]。结果 虽然一些病例对照和队列研究报告称,CU/CUD 与注意力缺失症或状态焦虑之间没有相关性(N = 5),但其他横断面和纵向研究报告称两者之间存在显著关系(N = 20)。元分析支持焦虑与 CU(N = 15 项研究,OR = 1.24,95% CI:1.06-1.45,p = 0.006)或 CUD(N = 13 项研究,OR = 1.68,95% CI:1.23-2.31,p = 0.001)相关。PATH 分析表明,自我药疗假说(N = 8)是最能解释 CU/CUD 与注意力缺失或状态焦虑之间关系的模型。尽管有多项大型队列研究的支持,但因果解释(N = 17)的可信度较低,而共同因素理论(N = 5)、压力归因错误假说和相互反馈理论则缺乏实质性证据支持。结论 大麻与焦虑之间的联系最好解释为焦虑使人倾向于将 CU 作为一种自我治疗方法。尽管多项纵向研究表明,CU 导致注意力缺失症发病率的因果关系不太可能存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信