The harmonious soul and the defence of music in sixteenth‐century England

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Katherine Butler
{"title":"The harmonious soul and the defence of music in sixteenth‐century England","authors":"Katherine Butler","doi":"10.1111/rest.12926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the history of the concept of the soul as a harmony—as opposed to merely being <jats:italic>like</jats:italic> a harmony—in sixteenth‐century England, demonstrating how debates over music's morality in sixteenth‐century England were a catalyst for theorising an increasing affinity between music and the soul. At the beginning of the sixteenth century, English writers valued music primarily for its restorative qualities or its potential to instil virtue, akin to arguments in Aristotle's <jats:italic>Politics</jats:italic>. As attacks on music intensified mid‐century, defenders turned to more Platonic views of music, gradually going as far as arguing that the soul itself was a harmony. As I demonstrate, however, music's defenders trod a fine line in using this concept, which had been challenged since classical times and caused problems for Christian theology and the notion of the immortal soul. Nevertheless, by the seventeenth century, the pervasiveness of the language of soul‐harmony was such that it continued to be influential in the seventeenth century as a tool for conveying the emerging new medical and cognitive theories.","PeriodicalId":45351,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the history of the concept of the soul as a harmony—as opposed to merely being like a harmony—in sixteenth‐century England, demonstrating how debates over music's morality in sixteenth‐century England were a catalyst for theorising an increasing affinity between music and the soul. At the beginning of the sixteenth century, English writers valued music primarily for its restorative qualities or its potential to instil virtue, akin to arguments in Aristotle's Politics. As attacks on music intensified mid‐century, defenders turned to more Platonic views of music, gradually going as far as arguing that the soul itself was a harmony. As I demonstrate, however, music's defenders trod a fine line in using this concept, which had been challenged since classical times and caused problems for Christian theology and the notion of the immortal soul. Nevertheless, by the seventeenth century, the pervasiveness of the language of soul‐harmony was such that it continued to be influential in the seventeenth century as a tool for conveying the emerging new medical and cognitive theories.
十六世纪英国的和谐灵魂与音乐辩护
本文研究了十六世纪英国关于灵魂是和声而非仅仅像和声这一概念的历史,展示了十六世纪英国关于音乐道德的争论是如何推动音乐与灵魂之间的理论联系日益紧密的。十六世纪初,英国作家对音乐的评价主要是其恢复力或灌输美德的潜力,这与亚里士多德《政治学》中的论点类似。随着本世纪中期对音乐的抨击愈演愈烈,辩护者转向了柏拉图式的音乐观点,甚至逐渐认为灵魂本身就是一种和声。然而,正如我所展示的,音乐的捍卫者在使用这一概念时走了一条精细的路线,因为这一概念自古典时期以来就一直受到质疑,并给基督教神学和不朽灵魂的概念带来了问题。尽管如此,到了 17 世纪,灵魂和谐的语言已经无处不在,以至于它在 17 世纪作为传达新出现的医学和认知理论的工具仍然具有影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renaissance Studies
Renaissance Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Renaissance Studies is a multi-disciplinary journal which publishes articles and editions of documents on all aspects of Renaissance history and culture. The articles range over the history, art, architecture, religion, literature, and languages of Europe during the period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信