An initial investigation into the use of machine learning methods for prediction of carcass component yields in F2 broiler chickens

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Hossein Bani Saadat, Rasoul Vaez Torshizi, Ghader Manafiazar, Ali Akbar Masoudi, Alireza Ehsani, Saleh Shahinfar
{"title":"An initial investigation into the use of machine learning methods for prediction of carcass component yields in F2 broiler chickens","authors":"Hossein Bani Saadat, Rasoul Vaez Torshizi, Ghader Manafiazar, Ali Akbar Masoudi, Alireza Ehsani, Saleh Shahinfar","doi":"10.1071/an23129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>As evaluation of carcass components is costly and time consuming, models for prediction of broiler carcass components are useful.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>The aim was to investigate the feasibility of machine learning methods in the prediction of carcass components from measurements on live birds during the rearing period.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Three machine learning methods, including regression tree, random forest and gradient-boosting trees, were applied to predict carcass yields, and benchmarked against classical linear regression. Two scenarios were defined for prediction. In the first scenario, carcass yields were predicted by live bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter features, recorded at 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age. In the second scenario, predictor features recorded at 5, 6 and 7 weeks of age were used. The two scenarios were reanalysed by including effective single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter as new predictor features.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The correlation coefficient between predicted and observed values for predicting weight of carcass traits ranged from 0.50 for wing to 0.59 for thigh in the first scenario, and from 0.63 for wing to 0.74 for carcass in the second scenario. These predictions for the percentage of carcass components ranged from 0.30 for wing to 0.39 for carcass and breast in the first scenario, and from 0.34 for thigh to 0.43 for carcass in the second scenario when random forest was used.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Predictive accuracy in the first scenario was lower than in the second scenario for all prediction methods. Including single-nucleotide polymorphisms as predictor features in either scenario did not increase the accuracy of the prediction.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>In general, random forest had the best performance among machine learning methods, and classical linear regression in two scenarios, suggesting that it may be considered as an alternative to conventional linear models for prediction of carcass traits in broiler chickens.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

As evaluation of carcass components is costly and time consuming, models for prediction of broiler carcass components are useful.

Aims

The aim was to investigate the feasibility of machine learning methods in the prediction of carcass components from measurements on live birds during the rearing period.

Methods

Three machine learning methods, including regression tree, random forest and gradient-boosting trees, were applied to predict carcass yields, and benchmarked against classical linear regression. Two scenarios were defined for prediction. In the first scenario, carcass yields were predicted by live bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter features, recorded at 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age. In the second scenario, predictor features recorded at 5, 6 and 7 weeks of age were used. The two scenarios were reanalysed by including effective single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter as new predictor features.

Key results

The correlation coefficient between predicted and observed values for predicting weight of carcass traits ranged from 0.50 for wing to 0.59 for thigh in the first scenario, and from 0.63 for wing to 0.74 for carcass in the second scenario. These predictions for the percentage of carcass components ranged from 0.30 for wing to 0.39 for carcass and breast in the first scenario, and from 0.34 for thigh to 0.43 for carcass in the second scenario when random forest was used.

Conclusions

Predictive accuracy in the first scenario was lower than in the second scenario for all prediction methods. Including single-nucleotide polymorphisms as predictor features in either scenario did not increase the accuracy of the prediction.

Implications

In general, random forest had the best performance among machine learning methods, and classical linear regression in two scenarios, suggesting that it may be considered as an alternative to conventional linear models for prediction of carcass traits in broiler chickens.

使用机器学习方法预测 F2 肉鸡胴体成分产量的初步研究
背景由于胴体成分的评估既费钱又费时,因此预测肉鸡胴体成分的模型非常有用。目的研究机器学习方法在预测肉鸡胴体成分方面的可行性。方法应用三种机器学习方法(包括回归树、随机森林和梯度提升树)预测胴体产量,并与经典线性回归进行比较。预测分为两种情况。在第一种情况下,胴体产量是通过在 2、3 和 4 周龄记录的活体体重、胫长和胫径特征来预测的。在第二种情况下,使用 5、6 和 7 周龄时记录的预测特征。将与体重、胫骨长度和胫骨直径相关的有效单核苷酸多态性作为新的预测特征,对这两种情况进行了重新分析。主要结果在第一种方案中,预测胴体重量性状的预测值与观察值之间的相关系数从翅膀的 0.50 到大腿的 0.59 不等;在第二种方案中,预测胴体重量性状的预测值与观察值之间的相关系数从翅膀的 0.63 到 0.74 不等。在第一种情况下,对胴体成分百分比的预测从0.30(翅膀)到0.39(胴体和胸脯)不等;在第二种情况下,使用随机森林时,对胴体成分百分比的预测从0.34(大腿)到0.43(胴体)不等。结论所有预测方法在第一种情况下的预测准确率都低于第二种情况。在任何一种情况下将单核苷酸多态性作为预测特征都不会提高预测的准确性。意义总的来说,在两种情况下,随机森林在机器学习方法和经典线性回归中表现最好,这表明在预测肉鸡胴体性状时,可以考虑用随机森林替代传统的线性模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Production Science
Animal Production Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant. Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信