Hossein Bani Saadat, Rasoul Vaez Torshizi, Ghader Manafiazar, Ali Akbar Masoudi, Alireza Ehsani, Saleh Shahinfar
{"title":"An initial investigation into the use of machine learning methods for prediction of carcass component yields in F2 broiler chickens","authors":"Hossein Bani Saadat, Rasoul Vaez Torshizi, Ghader Manafiazar, Ali Akbar Masoudi, Alireza Ehsani, Saleh Shahinfar","doi":"10.1071/an23129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>As evaluation of carcass components is costly and time consuming, models for prediction of broiler carcass components are useful.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>The aim was to investigate the feasibility of machine learning methods in the prediction of carcass components from measurements on live birds during the rearing period.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Three machine learning methods, including regression tree, random forest and gradient-boosting trees, were applied to predict carcass yields, and benchmarked against classical linear regression. Two scenarios were defined for prediction. In the first scenario, carcass yields were predicted by live bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter features, recorded at 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age. In the second scenario, predictor features recorded at 5, 6 and 7 weeks of age were used. The two scenarios were reanalysed by including effective single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter as new predictor features.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The correlation coefficient between predicted and observed values for predicting weight of carcass traits ranged from 0.50 for wing to 0.59 for thigh in the first scenario, and from 0.63 for wing to 0.74 for carcass in the second scenario. These predictions for the percentage of carcass components ranged from 0.30 for wing to 0.39 for carcass and breast in the first scenario, and from 0.34 for thigh to 0.43 for carcass in the second scenario when random forest was used.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Predictive accuracy in the first scenario was lower than in the second scenario for all prediction methods. Including single-nucleotide polymorphisms as predictor features in either scenario did not increase the accuracy of the prediction.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>In general, random forest had the best performance among machine learning methods, and classical linear regression in two scenarios, suggesting that it may be considered as an alternative to conventional linear models for prediction of carcass traits in broiler chickens.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
As evaluation of carcass components is costly and time consuming, models for prediction of broiler carcass components are useful.
Aims
The aim was to investigate the feasibility of machine learning methods in the prediction of carcass components from measurements on live birds during the rearing period.
Methods
Three machine learning methods, including regression tree, random forest and gradient-boosting trees, were applied to predict carcass yields, and benchmarked against classical linear regression. Two scenarios were defined for prediction. In the first scenario, carcass yields were predicted by live bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter features, recorded at 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age. In the second scenario, predictor features recorded at 5, 6 and 7 weeks of age were used. The two scenarios were reanalysed by including effective single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with bodyweight, shank length and shank diameter as new predictor features.
Key results
The correlation coefficient between predicted and observed values for predicting weight of carcass traits ranged from 0.50 for wing to 0.59 for thigh in the first scenario, and from 0.63 for wing to 0.74 for carcass in the second scenario. These predictions for the percentage of carcass components ranged from 0.30 for wing to 0.39 for carcass and breast in the first scenario, and from 0.34 for thigh to 0.43 for carcass in the second scenario when random forest was used.
Conclusions
Predictive accuracy in the first scenario was lower than in the second scenario for all prediction methods. Including single-nucleotide polymorphisms as predictor features in either scenario did not increase the accuracy of the prediction.
Implications
In general, random forest had the best performance among machine learning methods, and classical linear regression in two scenarios, suggesting that it may be considered as an alternative to conventional linear models for prediction of carcass traits in broiler chickens.
期刊介绍:
Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant.
Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.