Why do physicians go to work when they are sick? Presenteeism at different career stages

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
O. Urbano Gonzalo , B. Marco Gómez , C. Pérez Álvarez , A. Gállego Royo , I. Sebastián Sánchez , M.P. Astier Peña
{"title":"Why do physicians go to work when they are sick? Presenteeism at different career stages","authors":"O. Urbano Gonzalo ,&nbsp;B. Marco Gómez ,&nbsp;C. Pérez Álvarez ,&nbsp;A. Gállego Royo ,&nbsp;I. Sebastián Sánchez ,&nbsp;M.P. Astier Peña","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objective</h3><p>Physicians find it difficult to take on the role of the patient and they show unusual behaviors when ill. One of these behaviors is presenteeism, which is working while sick. The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that contribute to the phenomenon of presenteeism in Spanish physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Mixed methodology study: one national survey through the General Council of Medical Associations website (quantitative part), 22 semistructured interviews with sick residents and practicing physicians, and three focus groups involving professionals from the occupational health services (qualitative). A bivariate analysis using parametric and non-parametric tests. The significance level was <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 (95% confidence interval). Qualitative analysis using the comparative-constant method until saturation of information.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Presenteeism is reported by 89.4% of doctors who responded to the survey, and it is more common among women. Contributing factors include fear of overburdening colleagues (the main reason and more common among women 58.14% vs 48.35%), self-perception of doing one's duty (the second reason and more common among men, 44.63% vs 33.14%) and economic impact and difficulty in accepting the role of a sick person. This behavior has an impact on patient safety, and is part of the hidden curriculum that also affects the training of medical professionals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Presenteeism is a widespread and accepted practice among medical professionals. Although normalized, and even appreciated as a way to avoid overburdening colleagues, presenteeism has important implications for clinical ethics and patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective

Physicians find it difficult to take on the role of the patient and they show unusual behaviors when ill. One of these behaviors is presenteeism, which is working while sick. The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that contribute to the phenomenon of presenteeism in Spanish physicians.

Material and methods

Mixed methodology study: one national survey through the General Council of Medical Associations website (quantitative part), 22 semistructured interviews with sick residents and practicing physicians, and three focus groups involving professionals from the occupational health services (qualitative). A bivariate analysis using parametric and non-parametric tests. The significance level was p < 0.05 (95% confidence interval). Qualitative analysis using the comparative-constant method until saturation of information.

Results

Presenteeism is reported by 89.4% of doctors who responded to the survey, and it is more common among women. Contributing factors include fear of overburdening colleagues (the main reason and more common among women 58.14% vs 48.35%), self-perception of doing one's duty (the second reason and more common among men, 44.63% vs 33.14%) and economic impact and difficulty in accepting the role of a sick person. This behavior has an impact on patient safety, and is part of the hidden curriculum that also affects the training of medical professionals.

Conclusions

Presenteeism is a widespread and accepted practice among medical professionals. Although normalized, and even appreciated as a way to avoid overburdening colleagues, presenteeism has important implications for clinical ethics and patient safety.

为什么医生生病了还要上班?不同职业阶段的旷工现象。
导言和目的:医生很难扮演病人的角色,他们在生病时会表现出不同寻常的行为。其中一种行为就是带病工作。本研究的目的是分析导致西班牙医生出现缺勤现象的因素:混合方法研究:通过医学协会总理事会网站进行一次全国性调查(定量部分),对患病住院医师和执业医师进行 22 次半结构式访谈,以及由职业健康服务机构专业人员参加的三个焦点小组(定性部分)。采用参数和非参数检验进行了双变量分析。显著性水平为 p结果:89.4%的受访医生表示存在旷工现象,女性旷工现象更为普遍。造成这种现象的因素包括:担心同事负担过重(主要原因,女性更常见,58.14% 对 48.35%);自我感觉尽职尽责(次要原因,男性更常见,44.63% 对 33.14%);经济影响和难以接受病人的角色。这种行为会影响病人的安全,也是影响医务人员培训的隐性课程的一部分:结论:旷工在医务人员中是一种普遍且被接受的行为。虽然这种行为已被正常化,甚至被认为是避免同事负担过重的一种方式,但其对临床伦理和患者安全具有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信