Unraveling fundamental properties of power system resilience curves using unsupervised machine learning

IF 9.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Bo Li, Ali Mostafavi
{"title":"Unraveling fundamental properties of power system resilience curves using unsupervised machine learning","authors":"Bo Li,&nbsp;Ali Mostafavi","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Power system is vital to modern societies, while it is susceptible to hazard events. Thus, analyzing resilience characteristics of power system is important. The standard model of infrastructure resilience, the resilience triangle, has been the primary way of characterizing and quantifying resilience in infrastructure systems for more than two decades. However, the theoretical model provides a one-size-fits-all framework for all infrastructure systems and specifies general characteristics of resilience curves (e.g., residual performance and duration of recovery). Little empirical work has been done to delineate infrastructure resilience curve archetypes and their fundamental properties based on observational data. Most of the existing studies examine the characteristics of infrastructure resilience curves based on analytical models constructed upon simulated system performance. There is a dire dearth of empirical studies in the field, which hindered our ability to fully understand and predict resilience characteristics in infrastructure systems. To address this gap, this study examined more than two hundred power-grid resilience curves related to power outages in three major extreme weather events in the United States. Through the use of unsupervised machine learning, we examined different curve archetypes, as well as the fundamental properties of each resilience curve archetype. The results show two primary archetypes for power grid resilience curves, triangular curves, and trapezoidal curves. Triangular curves characterize resilience behavior based on three fundamental properties: 1. critical functionality threshold, 2. critical functionality recovery rate, and 3. recovery pivot point. Trapezoidal archetypes explain resilience curves based on 1. duration of sustained function loss and 2. constant recovery rate. The longer the duration of sustained function loss, the slower the constant rate of recovery. The findings of this study provide novel perspectives enabling better understanding and prediction of resilience performance of power system infrastructure in extreme weather events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654682400017X/pdfft?md5=cb4fd6b7ff61627f9c6f3afca7bd834b&pid=1-s2.0-S266654682400017X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654682400017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Power system is vital to modern societies, while it is susceptible to hazard events. Thus, analyzing resilience characteristics of power system is important. The standard model of infrastructure resilience, the resilience triangle, has been the primary way of characterizing and quantifying resilience in infrastructure systems for more than two decades. However, the theoretical model provides a one-size-fits-all framework for all infrastructure systems and specifies general characteristics of resilience curves (e.g., residual performance and duration of recovery). Little empirical work has been done to delineate infrastructure resilience curve archetypes and their fundamental properties based on observational data. Most of the existing studies examine the characteristics of infrastructure resilience curves based on analytical models constructed upon simulated system performance. There is a dire dearth of empirical studies in the field, which hindered our ability to fully understand and predict resilience characteristics in infrastructure systems. To address this gap, this study examined more than two hundred power-grid resilience curves related to power outages in three major extreme weather events in the United States. Through the use of unsupervised machine learning, we examined different curve archetypes, as well as the fundamental properties of each resilience curve archetype. The results show two primary archetypes for power grid resilience curves, triangular curves, and trapezoidal curves. Triangular curves characterize resilience behavior based on three fundamental properties: 1. critical functionality threshold, 2. critical functionality recovery rate, and 3. recovery pivot point. Trapezoidal archetypes explain resilience curves based on 1. duration of sustained function loss and 2. constant recovery rate. The longer the duration of sustained function loss, the slower the constant rate of recovery. The findings of this study provide novel perspectives enabling better understanding and prediction of resilience performance of power system infrastructure in extreme weather events.

Abstract Image

利用无监督机器学习揭示电力系统弹性曲线的基本特性
电力系统对现代社会至关重要,但也容易受到灾害事件的影响。因此,分析电力系统的复原力特征非常重要。二十多年来,基础设施复原力的标准模型--复原力三角一直是描述和量化基础设施系统复原力的主要方法。然而,该理论模型为所有基础设施系统提供了一个放之四海而皆准的框架,并规定了复原力曲线的一般特征(如剩余性能和恢复持续时间)。基于观测数据来划分基础设施复原力曲线原型及其基本特性的实证工作还很少。大多数现有研究都是根据模拟系统性能建立的分析模型来研究基础设施复原力曲线的特性。该领域的实证研究极为匮乏,这阻碍了我们全面了解和预测基础设施系统复原力特征的能力。为了弥补这一不足,本研究考察了美国三次重大极端天气事件中与断电相关的两百多条电网复原力曲线。通过使用无监督机器学习,我们研究了不同的曲线原型,以及每种弹性曲线原型的基本属性。结果显示,电网复原力曲线有两种主要原型:三角形曲线和梯形曲线。三角形曲线基于三个基本特性来描述恢复能力行为:临界功能阈值、临界功能恢复率和恢复支点。梯形原型根据 1.持续功能丧失持续时间和 2.恒定恢复率来解释弹性曲线。持续功能丧失时间越长,恒定恢复速度越慢。这项研究的结果提供了新的视角,有助于更好地理解和预测电力系统基础设施在极端天气事件中的恢复能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信