Stress Among Immigrants in the United States.

Abha Rai, Mary Lehman Held, Emmalee Osborne, Ishita Kapur
{"title":"Stress Among Immigrants in the United States.","authors":"Abha Rai, Mary Lehman Held, Emmalee Osborne, Ishita Kapur","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2024.2320345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immigrants comprise a sizable proportion (15%) of the population living in the United States (U.S.). Given these proportions, it is imperative that we understand immigrant experiences of well-being and stress toward improved well-being and integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To examine the experiences of first- and second-generation immigrants using a comparative approach, we utilized data from two surveys collected under Trump (<i>n</i> = 490) and Biden (<i>n</i> = 306) administrations. Both studies employed non-probability quota and convenience sampling techniques. Questions about experiences of stress (PSS-4), discrimination (Everyday Discrimination Scale), resilience (Brief Resilience Scale), border stress (Border Community and Immigration Stress Scale), immigration policies (general questions) were included in the surveys. Each study sample included diverse racial groups across both immigrant generations. We report frequencies, descriptive statistics, and ANOVAs/post hoc test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlight that levels of both stress and discrimination among non-White participants under the Trump administration were significantly higher than those of White participants, though neither relationship was significant under the Biden administration. Further, White participants exhibited higher resilience under the Trump administration, but not under the Biden administration.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first study to comparatively examine immigrant experiences under the two most recent federal administrations. This study is seminal in highlighting discussions and making policy recommendations to limit immigrant exclusion, curtail exclusionary policies regarding travel bans, and improve pathways to citizenship, enhancing immigrant integration in the U.S. Roles of social workers in supporting immigrant communities and pathways for future research with immigrants are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"509-528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2320345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immigrants comprise a sizable proportion (15%) of the population living in the United States (U.S.). Given these proportions, it is imperative that we understand immigrant experiences of well-being and stress toward improved well-being and integration.

Methods: To examine the experiences of first- and second-generation immigrants using a comparative approach, we utilized data from two surveys collected under Trump (n = 490) and Biden (n = 306) administrations. Both studies employed non-probability quota and convenience sampling techniques. Questions about experiences of stress (PSS-4), discrimination (Everyday Discrimination Scale), resilience (Brief Resilience Scale), border stress (Border Community and Immigration Stress Scale), immigration policies (general questions) were included in the surveys. Each study sample included diverse racial groups across both immigrant generations. We report frequencies, descriptive statistics, and ANOVAs/post hoc test results.

Results: Findings highlight that levels of both stress and discrimination among non-White participants under the Trump administration were significantly higher than those of White participants, though neither relationship was significant under the Biden administration. Further, White participants exhibited higher resilience under the Trump administration, but not under the Biden administration.

Discussion and conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to comparatively examine immigrant experiences under the two most recent federal administrations. This study is seminal in highlighting discussions and making policy recommendations to limit immigrant exclusion, curtail exclusionary policies regarding travel bans, and improve pathways to citizenship, enhancing immigrant integration in the U.S. Roles of social workers in supporting immigrant communities and pathways for future research with immigrants are discussed.

美国移民的压力。
背景:移民在美国人口中占有相当大的比例(15%)。鉴于这一比例,我们必须了解移民的幸福经历和压力,以改善他们的幸福和融入:为了采用比较法研究第一代和第二代移民的经历,我们利用了在特朗普(n = 490)和拜登(n = 306)执政期间收集的两项调查数据。两项研究均采用了非概率配额和便利抽样技术。调查内容包括压力体验(PSS-4)、歧视(日常歧视量表)、复原力(简易复原力量表)、边境压力(边境社区和移民压力量表)、移民政策(一般问题)。每个研究样本都包括两代移民中的不同种族群体。我们报告了频率、描述性统计和方差分析/事后检验结果:研究结果表明,在特朗普政府执政期间,非白人参与者的压力和歧视水平都明显高于白人参与者,但在拜登政府执政期间,这两种关系都不明显。此外,白人参与者在特朗普政府下表现出更高的抗压能力,而在拜登政府下则没有:据我们所知,这是第一项比较研究最近两届联邦政府下移民经历的研究。这项研究具有开创性意义,它突出了对限制移民排斥、减少旅行禁令方面的排斥性政策、改善入籍途径、促进移民融入美国的讨论和政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信