More isn't always better: Technology in the intensive care unit.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000398
Esther Olsen, Zhanna Novikov, Theadora Sakata, Monique H Lambert, Javier Lorenzo, Roger Bohn, Sara J Singer
{"title":"More isn't always better: Technology in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Esther Olsen, Zhanna Novikov, Theadora Sakata, Monique H Lambert, Javier Lorenzo, Roger Bohn, Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical care in modern intensive care units (ICUs) combines multidisciplinary expertise and a complex array of technologies. These technologies have clearly advanced the ability of clinicians to do more for patients, yet so much equipment also presents the possibility for cognitive overload.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate clinicians' experiences with and perceptions of technology in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We analyzed qualitative data from 30 interviews with ICU clinicians and frontline managers within four ICUs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our interviews identified three main challenges associated with technology in the ICU: (a) too many technologies and too much data; (b) inconsistent and inaccurate technologies; and (c) not enough integration among technologies, alignment with clinical workflows, and support for clinician identities. To address these challenges, interviewees highlighted mitigation strategies to address both social and technical systems and to achieve joint optimization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When new technologies are added to the ICU, they have potential both to improve and to disrupt patient care. To successfully implement technologies in the ICU, clinicians' perspectives are crucial. Understanding clinicians' perspectives can help limit the disruptive effects of new technologies, so clinicians can focus their time and attention on providing care to patients.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>As technology and data continue to play an increasingly important role in ICU care, everyone involved in the design, development, approval, implementation, and use of technology should work together to apply a sociotechnical systems approach to reduce possible negative effects on clinical care for critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 2","pages":"127-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical care in modern intensive care units (ICUs) combines multidisciplinary expertise and a complex array of technologies. These technologies have clearly advanced the ability of clinicians to do more for patients, yet so much equipment also presents the possibility for cognitive overload.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate clinicians' experiences with and perceptions of technology in ICUs.

Methodology/approach: We analyzed qualitative data from 30 interviews with ICU clinicians and frontline managers within four ICUs.

Results: Our interviews identified three main challenges associated with technology in the ICU: (a) too many technologies and too much data; (b) inconsistent and inaccurate technologies; and (c) not enough integration among technologies, alignment with clinical workflows, and support for clinician identities. To address these challenges, interviewees highlighted mitigation strategies to address both social and technical systems and to achieve joint optimization.

Conclusion: When new technologies are added to the ICU, they have potential both to improve and to disrupt patient care. To successfully implement technologies in the ICU, clinicians' perspectives are crucial. Understanding clinicians' perspectives can help limit the disruptive effects of new technologies, so clinicians can focus their time and attention on providing care to patients.

Practice implications: As technology and data continue to play an increasingly important role in ICU care, everyone involved in the design, development, approval, implementation, and use of technology should work together to apply a sociotechnical systems approach to reduce possible negative effects on clinical care for critically ill patients.

并非越多越好:重症监护室中的技术。
背景:现代重症监护病房(ICU)的临床护理结合了多学科专业知识和一系列复杂的技术。这些技术明显提高了临床医生为病人做更多工作的能力,但如此多的设备也可能造成认知超负荷。目的:本研究旨在调查临床医生在重症监护病房使用技术的经验和对技术的看法:我们分析了与四家重症监护室的重症监护室临床医生和一线管理人员进行的 30 次访谈的定性数据:我们在访谈中发现了 ICU 技术面临的三大挑战:(a) 技术过多、数据过多;(b) 技术不一致、不准确;(c) 技术之间的整合、与临床工作流程的协调以及对临床医生身份的支持不够。为应对这些挑战,受访者强调了针对社会和技术系统的缓解策略,以实现共同优化:结论:当新技术被引入重症监护室时,它们既有可能改善病人护理,也有可能破坏病人护理。要在重症监护室成功实施技术,临床医生的观点至关重要。了解临床医生的观点有助于限制新技术的破坏性影响,这样临床医生就可以集中时间和精力为患者提供护理服务:实践意义:随着技术和数据在重症监护室护理中发挥越来越重要的作用,参与技术设计、开发、审批、实施和使用的每个人都应共同努力,采用社会技术系统方法,减少对重症患者临床护理可能产生的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信