An evaluation of the social deprivation practice grant in Irish general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195
Muireann O Shea, Bridget Kiely, Patrick O'Donnell, Susan M Smith
{"title":"An evaluation of the social deprivation practice grant in Irish general practice.","authors":"Muireann O Shea, Bridget Kiely, Patrick O'Donnell, Susan M Smith","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inverse care law states that availability of good medical care varies inversely with the need for it in the population served. In 2019, the main medical union and the Department of Health in the Republic of Ireland (RoI), agreed on funding a social deprivation practice grant for general practices in urban deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the implementation and impact of the social deprivation practice grant in participating general practices.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A mixed-methods study with sequential design based in Irish general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected using a questionnaire and online semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff. Data were analysed separately, and the findings compared to examine the extent to which they converged or diverged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 survey responses and nine interviews. All practices reported the grant was beneficial and most practices utilised the grant to fund additional doctor hours (17/25). Both surveys and interviews indicated that a small amount of additional funding allowed additional clinical need in areas of deprivation to be addressed, but there were some barriers identified in accessing the grant and implementing planned expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivery of health care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation presents significant challenges. While there were some problems with implementation, the introduction of a small, targeted grant for general practices in areas of social deprivation allowed those practices to enhance their services, with tailored initiatives seeking to meet the needs of their patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The inverse care law states that availability of good medical care varies inversely with the need for it in the population served. In 2019, the main medical union and the Department of Health in the Republic of Ireland (RoI), agreed on funding a social deprivation practice grant for general practices in urban deprived areas.

Aim: To examine the implementation and impact of the social deprivation practice grant in participating general practices.

Design & setting: A mixed-methods study with sequential design based in Irish general practice.

Method: Data were collected using a questionnaire and online semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff. Data were analysed separately, and the findings compared to examine the extent to which they converged or diverged.

Results: There were 25 survey responses and nine interviews. All practices reported the grant was beneficial and most practices utilised the grant to fund additional doctor hours (17/25). Both surveys and interviews indicated that a small amount of additional funding allowed additional clinical need in areas of deprivation to be addressed, but there were some barriers identified in accessing the grant and implementing planned expenditure.

Conclusion: Delivery of health care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation presents significant challenges. While there were some problems with implementation, the introduction of a small, targeted grant for general practices in areas of social deprivation allowed those practices to enhance their services, with tailored initiatives seeking to meet the needs of their patient populations.

对爱尔兰全科医生社会贫困实践补助金的评估。
背景:反向医疗法》指出,良好医疗服务的可获得性与服务人口的需求成反比。2019年,爱尔兰主要医疗联盟和卫生部同意为城市贫困地区的全科医生诊所提供社会贫困实践补助金。目的:本研究旨在考察社会贫困实践补助金在参与研究的全科诊所中的实施情况和影响:在爱尔兰全科诊所开展的一项混合方法研究:方法:采用问卷调查和对全科医生及诊所员工进行在线半结构化访谈的方式收集数据。分别对数据进行分析,并对结果进行比较,以研究它们的趋同或差异程度:共收到 25 份调查问卷和 9 次访谈。所有诊所都表示补助金是有益的,大多数诊所利用补助金为医生增加工时提供资金(17/25)。调查和访谈均表明,少量的额外资金可以满足贫困地区的额外临床需求,但在获取补助金和执行计划支出方面存在一些障碍:结论:在社会经济贫困地区提供医疗服务是一项重大挑战。虽然在实施过程中遇到了一些问题,但为社会贫困地区的全科医生诊所提供小额、有针对性的补助金,使这些诊所能够通过量身定制的措施来加强服务,以满足其病人群体的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信