How severity of intimate partner violence is perceived and related to attitudinal variables? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Marta Badenes-Sastre , Chelsea M. Spencer , María Alonso-Ferres , Miguel Lorente , Francisca Expósito
{"title":"How severity of intimate partner violence is perceived and related to attitudinal variables? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Marta Badenes-Sastre ,&nbsp;Chelsea M. Spencer ,&nbsp;María Alonso-Ferres ,&nbsp;Miguel Lorente ,&nbsp;Francisca Expósito","doi":"10.1016/j.avb.2024.101925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a global public health problem where multiple factors, such as the perceptions and attitudes toward IPVAW, should be considered to properly address this issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the information available about perceived severity of IPVAW by different actors (e.g., victims, perpetrators, students, and professionals), analyzed the relationship between attitudes toward IPVAW and perceived severity of IPVAW, and examined gender differences in perceived severity of IPVAW. A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases. Studies were included if they (a) provide information about perceived severity of IPVAW (physical, psychological, or sexual violence); (b) the relationship between perception of severity of IPVAW and attitudes toward IPVAW was analyzed empirically; (c) the languages of publication were English or Spanish; and (d) they were not theoretical studies or reviews. To this end, two independent researchers selected studies, resolving discrepancies with a third researcher. A total of 27 studies were included in systematic review and 12 in the meta-analysis. The results showed that men perceived IPVAW as less severe than women. Likewise, a negative relationship was found between perceived IPVAW severity and favorable attitudes toward IPVAW, such as sexist views, victim blaming, excusing the perpetrator, rape myth acceptance, and traditional gender roles adherence. The Classic Fail-Safe <em>n</em> was calculated to ensure the finding was robust against potential publication bias. These findings highlight some of the potential factors to focus on IPVAW prevention programs. However, the number of studies included were limited, requiring more research to generalize the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51360,"journal":{"name":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000156/pdfft?md5=6db42e7c28c8c77ec3184279c2244173&pid=1-s2.0-S1359178924000156-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a global public health problem where multiple factors, such as the perceptions and attitudes toward IPVAW, should be considered to properly address this issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the information available about perceived severity of IPVAW by different actors (e.g., victims, perpetrators, students, and professionals), analyzed the relationship between attitudes toward IPVAW and perceived severity of IPVAW, and examined gender differences in perceived severity of IPVAW. A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases. Studies were included if they (a) provide information about perceived severity of IPVAW (physical, psychological, or sexual violence); (b) the relationship between perception of severity of IPVAW and attitudes toward IPVAW was analyzed empirically; (c) the languages of publication were English or Spanish; and (d) they were not theoretical studies or reviews. To this end, two independent researchers selected studies, resolving discrepancies with a third researcher. A total of 27 studies were included in systematic review and 12 in the meta-analysis. The results showed that men perceived IPVAW as less severe than women. Likewise, a negative relationship was found between perceived IPVAW severity and favorable attitudes toward IPVAW, such as sexist views, victim blaming, excusing the perpetrator, rape myth acceptance, and traditional gender roles adherence. The Classic Fail-Safe n was calculated to ensure the finding was robust against potential publication bias. These findings highlight some of the potential factors to focus on IPVAW prevention programs. However, the number of studies included were limited, requiring more research to generalize the results.

亲密伴侣暴力的严重程度如何被感知并与态度变量相关?系统回顾和荟萃分析
亲密伴侣对妇女的暴力行为(IPVAW)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,要妥善解决这一问题,应考虑多种因素,如对 IPVAW 的看法和态度。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了不同参与者(如受害者、施暴者、学生和专业人士)对 IPVAW 严重性的认知信息,分析了对 IPVAW 的态度与 IPVAW 严重性认知之间的关系,并研究了 IPVAW 严重性认知中的性别差异。根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,我们使用 Web of Science、Scopus 和 ProQuest 数据库进行了系统检索。纳入的研究必须符合以下条件:(a) 提供了有关对 IPVAW(身体、心理或性暴力)严重性的感知信息;(b) 对 IPVAW 严重性的感知与对 IPVAW 的态度之间的关系进行了实证分析;(c) 出版语言为英语或西班牙语;(d) 不是理论研究或综述。为此,两名独立的研究人员对研究报告进行了筛选,并与第三名研究人员解决了不一致的问题。共有 27 项研究被纳入系统综述,12 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。结果显示,男性认为对妇女的 IPVAW 没有女性严重。同样,在感知到的 IPVAW 严重程度与对 IPVAW 的有利态度(如性别歧视观点、责怪受害者、为施暴者开脱、接受强奸神话和坚持传统性别角色)之间也发现了负相关。经典失效安全 n 的计算是为了确保研究结果的稳健性,避免潜在的发表偏差。这些发现突显了预防对妇女的暴力行为计划中需要关注的一些潜在因素。然而,纳入的研究数量有限,需要更多的研究来推广这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Aggression and Violent Behavior, A Review Journal is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes substantive and integrative reviews, as well as summary reports of innovative ongoing clinical research programs on a wide range of topics germane to the field of aggression and violent behavior. Papers encompass a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including homicide (serial, spree, and mass murder: sexual homicide), sexual deviance and assault (rape, serial rape, child molestation, paraphilias), child and youth violence (firesetting, gang violence, juvenile sexual offending), family violence (child physical and sexual abuse, child neglect, incest, spouse and elder abuse), genetic predispositions, and the physiological basis of aggression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信