Redesigning public squat toilets ergonomically: Understanding gender disparities in foot span and squatting balance

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yu-Chi Lee
{"title":"Redesigning public squat toilets ergonomically: Understanding gender disparities in foot span and squatting balance","authors":"Yu-Chi Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assessed sex differences in natural squatting postures in public squatting toilets by collecting data on the span between feet (SBF), the angle between the feet, and the overall stability index (OSI). Sixty participants were recruited, and 24 experimental squatting toilets were simulated by comparing the inner shape, frame, antiskid design, and size of the most comfortable squatting posture for each toilet, plus the subjective comfort evaluation. The results showed a significant sex difference in squatting toilets. The comfortable outward angle between the feet was 40.56° and 28.99° in men and women, respectively. The inner shape only impacted the SBF, while irregular frames resulted in a higher OSI than square frames. In terms of subjective perception, O-shaped internal structures and square frames were the most popular. The SBF of the natural squatting positions of men and women can provide a reference for the design of an optimal squatting toilet.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed sex differences in natural squatting postures in public squatting toilets by collecting data on the span between feet (SBF), the angle between the feet, and the overall stability index (OSI). Sixty participants were recruited, and 24 experimental squatting toilets were simulated by comparing the inner shape, frame, antiskid design, and size of the most comfortable squatting posture for each toilet, plus the subjective comfort evaluation. The results showed a significant sex difference in squatting toilets. The comfortable outward angle between the feet was 40.56° and 28.99° in men and women, respectively. The inner shape only impacted the SBF, while irregular frames resulted in a higher OSI than square frames. In terms of subjective perception, O-shaped internal structures and square frames were the most popular. The SBF of the natural squatting positions of men and women can provide a reference for the design of an optimal squatting toilet.

重新设计符合人体工程学的公共蹲厕:了解脚跨度和蹲位平衡方面的性别差异
本研究通过收集两脚之间的跨度(SBF)、两脚之间的角度和整体稳定性指数(OSI)等数据,评估了在公共蹲厕中自然蹲姿的性别差异。研究人员招募了 60 名参与者,通过比较每个厕所的内部形状、框架、防滑设计和最舒适蹲姿的大小,以及主观舒适度评价,模拟了 24 个实验性蹲厕。结果显示,蹲厕的性别差异明显。男性和女性舒适的双脚向外角度分别为 40.56°和 28.99°。内部形状只对 SBF 有影响,而不规则框架的 OSI 要高于方形框架。在主观感受方面,O 形内部结构和方形框架最受欢迎。男女自然蹲姿的 SBF 可为最佳蹲便器的设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信