Understanding how education reform influences pre-service teachers’ teacher self-efficacy

Q1 Social Sciences
Danielle Gordon, Terri Bourke, Reece Mills, Christopher N. Blundell
{"title":"Understanding how education reform influences pre-service teachers’ teacher self-efficacy","authors":"Danielle Gordon,&nbsp;Terri Bourke,&nbsp;Reece Mills,&nbsp;Christopher N. Blundell","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Internationally, governments and education authorities initiate reforms to improve schooling. However, little is known about how these reforms influence pre-service teachers’ (PST) teacher self-efficacy (TSE). This study investigates PSTs’ TSE in the context of significant curriculum and assessment reform in Queensland, Australia. Data were collected from final year secondary preservice teachers who responded to a four-dimensional Teacher Self-Efficacy in Reform Scale (TSERS) survey (<em>N</em> = 114) and semi-structured interviews (<em>N</em> = 20). The results indicate that PSTs’ TSE in a context of education reform is high but varied, the variation being influenced both positively and negatively by the four sources of TSE, mastery and vicarious experiences, social persuasion, and emotional arousal. To better explore PSTs’ TSE in a context of education reform the quantitative and qualitative data were brought together to reveal three PST cohorts characterised by similar experiences. These cohorts consisted of, 1) PSTs whose higher TSE is related to mastery and vicarious experiences in schools; 2) PSTs whose TSE is lowered by limited opportunities in schools; and 3) PSTs whose negative emotional arousal lowered TSE. Notably, the findings highlight a dearth of opportunities for PSTs to actively participate in the implementation of educational reforms within school environments. Moreover, the findings underscore the pivotal role of enacted mastery and vicarious experiences in fostering high teacher self-efficacy, juxtaposed against the impact of negative emotional arousal during periods of change. This study contributes valuable insights for shaping the professional journey of PSTs, emphasising the need for targeted support and opportunities for PSTs to engage meaningfully in the change processes unfolding in educational settings. The implications of these findings extend to informing policies and practices that nurture the TSE of future educators navigating the complex terrain of educational reform.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000207/pdfft?md5=aca7d04b5279665a71445605769a5d9f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374024000207-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internationally, governments and education authorities initiate reforms to improve schooling. However, little is known about how these reforms influence pre-service teachers’ (PST) teacher self-efficacy (TSE). This study investigates PSTs’ TSE in the context of significant curriculum and assessment reform in Queensland, Australia. Data were collected from final year secondary preservice teachers who responded to a four-dimensional Teacher Self-Efficacy in Reform Scale (TSERS) survey (N = 114) and semi-structured interviews (N = 20). The results indicate that PSTs’ TSE in a context of education reform is high but varied, the variation being influenced both positively and negatively by the four sources of TSE, mastery and vicarious experiences, social persuasion, and emotional arousal. To better explore PSTs’ TSE in a context of education reform the quantitative and qualitative data were brought together to reveal three PST cohorts characterised by similar experiences. These cohorts consisted of, 1) PSTs whose higher TSE is related to mastery and vicarious experiences in schools; 2) PSTs whose TSE is lowered by limited opportunities in schools; and 3) PSTs whose negative emotional arousal lowered TSE. Notably, the findings highlight a dearth of opportunities for PSTs to actively participate in the implementation of educational reforms within school environments. Moreover, the findings underscore the pivotal role of enacted mastery and vicarious experiences in fostering high teacher self-efficacy, juxtaposed against the impact of negative emotional arousal during periods of change. This study contributes valuable insights for shaping the professional journey of PSTs, emphasising the need for targeted support and opportunities for PSTs to engage meaningfully in the change processes unfolding in educational settings. The implications of these findings extend to informing policies and practices that nurture the TSE of future educators navigating the complex terrain of educational reform.

了解教育改革如何影响职前教师的教师自我效能感
在国际上,各国政府和教育当局都会发起改革,以改善学校教育。然而,人们对这些改革如何影响职前教师(PST)的教师自我效能感(TSE)知之甚少。本研究调查了澳大利亚昆士兰州重大课程和评估改革背景下的职前教师自我效能感。研究收集了中学最后一年职前教师的数据,这些教师回答了四维教师改革自我效能感量表(TSERS)调查(114 人)和半结构式访谈(20 人)。结果表明,在教育改革背景下,PSTs 的 TSE 很高,但存在差异,这种差异受到 TSE 的四个来源、掌握和替代经验、社会说服和情绪唤醒的积极和消极影响。为了更好地探索教育改革背景下 PST 的 TSE,我们将定量和定性数据结合起来,以揭示具有相似经历的三个 PST 组群。这些群体包括:1)在学校中掌握知识和获得替代经验的 PST,其 TSE 较高;2)在学校中机会有限的 PST,其 TSE 较低;以及 3)负面情绪唤醒降低了 TSE 的 PST。值得注意的是,研究结果突出表明,小学生缺乏积极参与学校教育改革的机会。此外,研究结果还强调了实践掌握和替代体验在培养高教师自我效能感方面的关键作用,而在变革时期,消极情绪唤醒则会产生影响。这项研究为塑造小学教师的专业历程提供了宝贵的见解,强调了有针对性的支持和机会的必要性,使小学教师能够有意义地参与到教育环境中正在展开的变革过程中。这些研究结果的意义还在于为培养未来教育工作者在复杂的教育改革环境中驾驭 TSE 的政策和实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信