Screening for health literacy, social determinants, and discrimination in health plans.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
J Nwando Olayiwola, Candy Magaña, Bereket Kindo, Jill Soderquist, Faith Obanua, Fawwaz Haq, Jordyn Newcome, Angela Hagan, Stephanie Franklin, Tamara Smith, Juan Troy, Joanna Bugbee, William H Shrank
{"title":"Screening for health literacy, social determinants, and discrimination in health plans.","authors":"J Nwando Olayiwola, Candy Magaña, Bereket Kindo, Jill Soderquist, Faith Obanua, Fawwaz Haq, Jordyn Newcome, Angela Hagan, Stephanie Franklin, Tamara Smith, Juan Troy, Joanna Bugbee, William H Shrank","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health inequities are frequently driven by social determinants of health (SDOH) and structural determinants of health. Our pilot sought to test the feasibility of screening for health literacy (HL) and perceived health care discrimination (PHD) through a live telephonic-facilitated survey experience with managed care patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Newly enrolled Medicare Advantage patients were screened for self-reported PHD, HL, and multiple SDOH using validated screening tools. Response rates for both HL and PHD screens were analyzed. A χ2 test for association between response to PHD screen and patient race was conducted. A weighted logistic regression model was used to understand how HL is associated with SDOH and demographic factors (age, gender, race/ethnicity, and income).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HL and PHD screening questions have different levels of feasibility. Administering the HL screen did not present a challenge, and patients felt comfortable responding to it. On the other hand, the PHD question had a lower response rate among patients, and some concierge advocates felt uncomfortable asking patients the question. Based on the self-reported HL data collected, low/limited HL is associated with patients who were Black, were low income, reported loneliness or isolation, or reported food insecurity. It is important to note that the study's findings are limited by the small sample size and that study results do not imply causality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is feasible to collect self-reported HL data through a live telephonic format at the time of patient enrollment into a health plan. Health plans can leverage such screenings to better understand patient barriers for health equity-oriented interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Health inequities are frequently driven by social determinants of health (SDOH) and structural determinants of health. Our pilot sought to test the feasibility of screening for health literacy (HL) and perceived health care discrimination (PHD) through a live telephonic-facilitated survey experience with managed care patients.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Newly enrolled Medicare Advantage patients were screened for self-reported PHD, HL, and multiple SDOH using validated screening tools. Response rates for both HL and PHD screens were analyzed. A χ2 test for association between response to PHD screen and patient race was conducted. A weighted logistic regression model was used to understand how HL is associated with SDOH and demographic factors (age, gender, race/ethnicity, and income).

Results: HL and PHD screening questions have different levels of feasibility. Administering the HL screen did not present a challenge, and patients felt comfortable responding to it. On the other hand, the PHD question had a lower response rate among patients, and some concierge advocates felt uncomfortable asking patients the question. Based on the self-reported HL data collected, low/limited HL is associated with patients who were Black, were low income, reported loneliness or isolation, or reported food insecurity. It is important to note that the study's findings are limited by the small sample size and that study results do not imply causality.

Conclusions: It is feasible to collect self-reported HL data through a live telephonic format at the time of patient enrollment into a health plan. Health plans can leverage such screenings to better understand patient barriers for health equity-oriented interventions.

在医疗计划中筛查健康素养、社会决定因素和歧视。
目标:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和健康的结构决定因素经常会导致健康不平等。我们的试点项目旨在通过对管理式医疗患者进行现场电话协助调查,测试筛查健康素养(HL)和感知到的医疗歧视(PHD)的可行性:研究设计:横断面研究:研究设计:横断面研究。方法:使用经过验证的筛查工具,对新注册的医疗保险优势项目患者进行自我报告的 PHD、HL 和多种 SDOH 筛查。对 HL 和 PHD 筛查的响应率进行了分析。对 PHD 筛查反应与患者种族之间的关联进行了 χ2 检验。使用加权逻辑回归模型了解 HL 与 SDOH 和人口统计因素(年龄、性别、种族/民族和收入)之间的关系:结果:HL 和 PHD 筛查问题具有不同程度的可行性。进行 HL 筛查并不困难,患者也能轻松应答。另一方面,PHD 问题在患者中的回答率较低,一些健康倡导者对向患者提出该问题感到不自在。根据收集到的自我报告 HL 数据,低水平/有限水平 HL 与黑人、低收入、报告孤独或孤立或报告食物无保障的患者有关。值得注意的是,由于样本量较小,研究结果受到一定限制,而且研究结果并不意味着因果关系:在患者加入健康计划时,通过现场电话形式收集自我报告的 HL 数据是可行的。医疗计划可利用此类筛查更好地了解患者的障碍,从而采取以健康公平为导向的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信