Scaling care coordination through digital engagement: stepped-wedge trial assessing readmissions.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandra Polovneff, Neemit Shah, Abhishek Janardan, Erika Smith, Ivan Pasillas, Natalie Mortensen, Jeana M Holt, Melek Somai, Rodney Sparapani, Bradley Crotty
{"title":"Scaling care coordination through digital engagement: stepped-wedge trial assessing readmissions.","authors":"Alexandra Polovneff, Neemit Shah, Abhishek Janardan, Erika Smith, Ivan Pasillas, Natalie Mortensen, Jeana M Holt, Melek Somai, Rodney Sparapani, Bradley Crotty","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transitions of care are pivotal, vulnerable times as patients are discharged from the hospital. Telephonic care coordination is standard care, but labor intensive. We implemented a patient postdischarge digital engagement (PDDE) program to scale coordination. We hypothesized that PDDE could reduce readmissions for low-risk patients and supplement care coordination for medium- and high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomization trial with 5 implementation waves based upon primary care clinic region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All inpatient hospital discharges between March 2020 and November 2020 were stratified by readmission risk. Low-risk patients were offered access to PDDE, and moderate-risk and high-risk patients were offered access to PDDE and care coordination. Readmission was defined as an unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days from discharge. An intention-to-treat primary analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression clustering for wave; a treatment-on-the-treated analysis was also conducted to assess the impact among program users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5490 patient discharges were examined (2735 control; 2755 intervention); 1949 patients were high risk, 2032 were medium risk, and 1509 were low risk. PDDE intervention did not significantly affect readmission among low-risk (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.90; P  = .23), medium-risk (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.60; P  = .21), and high-risk (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.64; P  = .48) groups after adjustment for time and patient factors. In a treatment-on-the-treated analysis, among patients who activated the PDDE program, readmission was also similar among the low-, medium-, and high-risk cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study expanded resource-limited care coordination by offering low-risk patients a service they were unable to receive previously while having no impact on readmission. PDDE efficiently provided additional touch points between patients and providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Transitions of care are pivotal, vulnerable times as patients are discharged from the hospital. Telephonic care coordination is standard care, but labor intensive. We implemented a patient postdischarge digital engagement (PDDE) program to scale coordination. We hypothesized that PDDE could reduce readmissions for low-risk patients and supplement care coordination for medium- and high-risk patients.

Study design: Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomization trial with 5 implementation waves based upon primary care clinic region.

Methods: All inpatient hospital discharges between March 2020 and November 2020 were stratified by readmission risk. Low-risk patients were offered access to PDDE, and moderate-risk and high-risk patients were offered access to PDDE and care coordination. Readmission was defined as an unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days from discharge. An intention-to-treat primary analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression clustering for wave; a treatment-on-the-treated analysis was also conducted to assess the impact among program users.

Results: A total of 5490 patient discharges were examined (2735 control; 2755 intervention); 1949 patients were high risk, 2032 were medium risk, and 1509 were low risk. PDDE intervention did not significantly affect readmission among low-risk (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.90; P  = .23), medium-risk (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.60; P  = .21), and high-risk (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.64; P  = .48) groups after adjustment for time and patient factors. In a treatment-on-the-treated analysis, among patients who activated the PDDE program, readmission was also similar among the low-, medium-, and high-risk cohorts.

Conclusions: Our study expanded resource-limited care coordination by offering low-risk patients a service they were unable to receive previously while having no impact on readmission. PDDE efficiently provided additional touch points between patients and providers.

通过数字参与扩大护理协调:评估再入院情况的阶梯式楔形试验。
目标:在病人出院时,护理过渡是非常关键和脆弱的时期。电话护理协调是标准护理,但需要大量人力。我们实施了一项患者出院后数字参与(PDDE)计划,以扩大协调范围。我们假设,PDDE 可以降低低风险患者的再入院率,并对中高风险患者的护理协调起到补充作用:研究设计:务实的阶梯式分组随机试验,根据初级保健诊所所在区域分为 5 个实施阶段:根据再入院风险对 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 11 月期间的所有出院住院患者进行分层。低风险患者可获得 PDDE,中度风险和高风险患者可获得 PDDE 和护理协调。再入院定义为出院后 30 天内的非计划住院。采用混合效应逻辑回归对波浪进行聚类,进行了意向治疗初级分析;还进行了治疗对治疗的分析,以评估计划使用者的影响:共检查了5490名出院患者(2735名对照组;2755名干预组);1949名患者为高风险,2032名患者为中风险,1509名患者为低风险。在对时间和患者因素进行调整后,PDDE 干预对低风险组(95% CI,-0.23 至 0.90;P = .23)、中风险组(95% CI,-0.14 至 0.60;P = .21)和高风险组(95% CI,-0.32 至 0.64;P = .48)的再入院率没有明显影响。在治疗对治疗的分析中,在启动PDDE项目的患者中,低、中、高风险组的再入院情况也相似:我们的研究扩大了资源有限的护理协调,为低风险患者提供了他们以前无法获得的服务,同时对再入院没有影响。PDDE 在患者和医疗服务提供者之间有效地提供了额外的接触点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信