A content analysis of YouTube videos on palliative care: understanding the quality and availability of online resources.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241231819
Fhaied Almobarak
{"title":"A content analysis of YouTube videos on palliative care: understanding the quality and availability of online resources.","authors":"Fhaied Almobarak","doi":"10.1177/26323524241231819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improvement in quality care is an important aspect of palliative care for individuals with serious illnesses. Palliative care is a multidisciplinary strategy that addresses the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of patients and their families. As technology advances, digital media - especially YouTube - has come to serve as a virtual educational platform, offering resources for health-related information, including information about palliative care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this research, the main goal was to evaluate the quality and availability of online resources related to palliative care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two theoretical frameworks were used: the Health Communication Model and the Information Quality Framework. These frameworks offer a way to understand how YouTube videos contribute to palliative care information and assess the quality of that information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilizes a quantitative analysis approach to assess the quality and accessibility of YouTube videos on palliative care. Specifically, a random sample of 300 YouTube videos addressing palliative care was examined. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, including the frequency and distribution of the different types of content, sources, and quality indicators. Chi-square tests were done to compare the quality of information provided by different sources and types of content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed a variety of video types, with educational videos being the most common (40%), followed by personal stories (26.7%) and promotional videos (16.7%). We found that healthcare organizations (30%) and individual content creators (46.7%) were the sources for these videos.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were varying scores in terms of accuracy, completeness, and relevance when it came to quality assessment. While many videos received excellent ratings, some received poor ratings. Additionally, this analysis revealed that the majority of these videos were in English (83.3%), which poses a limitation for non-English speakers who may have difficulty understanding them.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241231819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improvement in quality care is an important aspect of palliative care for individuals with serious illnesses. Palliative care is a multidisciplinary strategy that addresses the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of patients and their families. As technology advances, digital media - especially YouTube - has come to serve as a virtual educational platform, offering resources for health-related information, including information about palliative care.

Objectives: In this research, the main goal was to evaluate the quality and availability of online resources related to palliative care.

Design: Two theoretical frameworks were used: the Health Communication Model and the Information Quality Framework. These frameworks offer a way to understand how YouTube videos contribute to palliative care information and assess the quality of that information.

Methods: This study utilizes a quantitative analysis approach to assess the quality and accessibility of YouTube videos on palliative care. Specifically, a random sample of 300 YouTube videos addressing palliative care was examined. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, including the frequency and distribution of the different types of content, sources, and quality indicators. Chi-square tests were done to compare the quality of information provided by different sources and types of content.

Results: The results showed a variety of video types, with educational videos being the most common (40%), followed by personal stories (26.7%) and promotional videos (16.7%). We found that healthcare organizations (30%) and individual content creators (46.7%) were the sources for these videos.

Conclusion: There were varying scores in terms of accuracy, completeness, and relevance when it came to quality assessment. While many videos received excellent ratings, some received poor ratings. Additionally, this analysis revealed that the majority of these videos were in English (83.3%), which poses a limitation for non-English speakers who may have difficulty understanding them.

对 YouTube 上有关姑息关怀的视频进行内容分析:了解在线资源的质量和可用性。
背景:提高护理质量是为重症患者提供姑息关怀的一个重要方面。姑息关怀是一种多学科策略,可满足患者及其家属在身体、情感、社会和精神方面的需求。随着技术的进步,数字媒体(尤其是 YouTube)已成为一个虚拟的教育平台,提供与健康相关的信息资源,包括有关姑息关怀的信息:本研究的主要目标是评估与姑息关怀相关的在线资源的质量和可用性:设计:使用了两个理论框架:健康交流模型和信息质量框架。这些框架为了解 YouTube 视频如何为姑息关怀信息做出贡献以及评估信息质量提供了一种方法:本研究采用定量分析方法来评估 YouTube 上姑息关怀视频的质量和可访问性。具体来说,研究人员随机抽取了 300 个 YouTube 上有关姑息关怀的视频进行研究。使用描述性统计来分析数据,包括不同类型内容、来源和质量指标的频率和分布。对不同来源和不同类型的内容所提供的信息质量进行了卡方检验:结果显示,视频类型多种多样,其中教育视频最常见(40%),其次是个人故事(26.7%)和宣传视频(16.7%)。我们发现,医疗机构(30%)和个人内容创作者(46.7%)是这些视频的来源:在质量评估方面,准确性、完整性和相关性的得分参差不齐。虽然许多视频获得了极好的评价,但也有一些视频获得了较差的评价。此外,分析表明,这些视频大部分是英语视频(83.3%),这对非英语使用者造成了限制,因为他们可能难以理解这些视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信