Using the Amsler Grid Test for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening.

Q3 Medicine
Seyyide Ayşenur Kuzucu Üşümüş, Ayşe Gül Koçak Altıntaş, Ayşe Özdemir, Cenk Aypak
{"title":"Using the Amsler Grid Test for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening.","authors":"Seyyide Ayşenur Kuzucu Üşümüş, Ayşe Gül Koçak Altıntaş, Ayşe Özdemir, Cenk Aypak","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.04238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the use of the Amsler grid test (AGT) in screening for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), one of the most common causes of blindness, in primary healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The AGT was applied to 700 eyes of 355 people aged 50 and over who applied to a family health center in Ankara and had no eye complaints. The test was considered positive if the lines on the AGT card were seen as broken or curved, there was a difference in shape or size between the squares, or a color change or blurring was described in any area. An ophthalmologist was consulted if the AGT was positive in one or both eyes. Patients considered suitable by ophthalmologists were evaluated with optical coherence tomography. AGT results were compared with ophthalmologist examination and tomography findings in terms of AMD detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AGT was positive in 97 (13.9%) and negative in 603 (86.1%) out of 700 eyes included in the study. A total of 184 eyes, 79 with a positive AGT and 105 eyes with a negative test, were evaluated by an ophthalmologist. As a result of examinations and tests performed by ophthalmologists, AMD was detected in a total of 67 eyes: 42 of 79 eyes with positive AGT and 25 of 105 eyes with negative AGT but referred to an ophthalmologist for different reasons. In our study, the AGT had 62.7% sensitivity and 68.4% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AGT is an inexpensive and easily applicable test. Although moderate sensitivity and specificity were found in our study; further studies are needed to evaluate the suitability of its use for AMD screening in primary care with limited facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.04238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of the Amsler grid test (AGT) in screening for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), one of the most common causes of blindness, in primary healthcare settings.

Materials and methods: The AGT was applied to 700 eyes of 355 people aged 50 and over who applied to a family health center in Ankara and had no eye complaints. The test was considered positive if the lines on the AGT card were seen as broken or curved, there was a difference in shape or size between the squares, or a color change or blurring was described in any area. An ophthalmologist was consulted if the AGT was positive in one or both eyes. Patients considered suitable by ophthalmologists were evaluated with optical coherence tomography. AGT results were compared with ophthalmologist examination and tomography findings in terms of AMD detection.

Results: The AGT was positive in 97 (13.9%) and negative in 603 (86.1%) out of 700 eyes included in the study. A total of 184 eyes, 79 with a positive AGT and 105 eyes with a negative test, were evaluated by an ophthalmologist. As a result of examinations and tests performed by ophthalmologists, AMD was detected in a total of 67 eyes: 42 of 79 eyes with positive AGT and 25 of 105 eyes with negative AGT but referred to an ophthalmologist for different reasons. In our study, the AGT had 62.7% sensitivity and 68.4% specificity.

Conclusion: The AGT is an inexpensive and easily applicable test. Although moderate sensitivity and specificity were found in our study; further studies are needed to evaluate the suitability of its use for AMD screening in primary care with limited facilities.

使用阿姆斯勒网格测试筛查老年性黄斑变性。
目的评估阿姆斯勒网格测试(AGT)在初级医疗机构中筛查老年性黄斑变性(AMD)的应用情况,老年性黄斑变性是最常见的致盲原因之一:在安卡拉一家家庭保健中心对 355 名 50 岁及以上、无眼部不适的人的 700 只眼睛进行了 AGT 测试。如果看到 AGT 卡上的线条断裂或弯曲,方格之间的形状或大小有差异,或任何区域出现颜色变化或模糊,则认为测试结果呈阳性。如果单眼或双眼的 AGT 均呈阳性,则需咨询眼科医生。眼科医生认为合适的患者将接受光学相干断层扫描评估。将 AGT 结果与眼科医生的检查和断层扫描发现的 AMD 检测结果进行比较:在研究的 700 只眼睛中,AGT 阳性的有 97 只(13.9%),阴性的有 603 只(86.1%)。共有 184 只眼睛接受了眼科医生的评估,其中 79 只为 AGT 阳性,105 只为阴性。经过眼科医生的检查和化验,共有 67 只眼睛被检测出患有老年性黄斑变性:79只AGT呈阳性的眼睛中有42只,105只AGT呈阴性的眼睛中有25只因不同原因转诊至眼科医生。在我们的研究中,AGT 的灵敏度为 62.7%,特异性为 68.4%:结论:AGT 是一种价格低廉且易于使用的检测方法。尽管在我们的研究中发现了适度的灵敏度和特异性,但仍需进一步研究,以评估在设施有限的初级医疗机构中使用 AGT 筛查老年黄斑病变是否合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信