Recognition, diagnosis, and operability assessment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): A global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY).

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2024-02-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.12330
Grzegorz Kopeć, Paul Forfia, Kohtaro Abe, Amélie Beaudet, Virginie Gressin, Mitja Jevnikar, Catherina Meijer, Yan Zhi Tan, Olga Moiseeva, Karen Sheares, Nika Skoro-Sajer, Mario Terra-Filho, Helen Whitford, Zhenguo Zhai, Gustavo A Heresi
{"title":"Recognition, diagnosis, and operability assessment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): A global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY).","authors":"Grzegorz Kopeć, Paul Forfia, Kohtaro Abe, Amélie Beaudet, Virginie Gressin, Mitja Jevnikar, Catherina Meijer, Yan Zhi Tan, Olga Moiseeva, Karen Sheares, Nika Skoro-Sajer, Mario Terra-Filho, Helen Whitford, Zhenguo Zhai, Gustavo A Heresi","doi":"10.1002/pul2.12330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early recognition and diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is crucial for improving prognosis and reducing the disease burden. Established clinical practice guidelines describe interventions for the diagnosis and evaluation of CTEPH, yet limited insight remains into clinical practice variation and barriers to care. The CTEPH global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY) was developed to gather insights into the current diagnosis, treatment, and management of CTEPH and to identify unmet medical needs. This paper focuses on the recognition and diagnosis of CTEPH and the referral and evaluation of these patients. The survey was offered to hospital-based medical specialists through Scientific Societies and other medical organizations, from September 2021 to May 2022. Response data from 353 physicians showed that self-reported awareness of CTEPH increased over the past 10 years among 96% of respondents. Clinical practices in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) follow-up and CTEPH diagnosis differed among respondents. While 50% of respondents working in a nonexpert center reported to refer patients to an expert pulmonary hypertension/CTEPH center when CTEPH is suspected, 51% of these physicians did not report referral of patients with a confirmed diagnosis for further evaluation. Up to 50% of respondents involved in the evaluation of referred patients have concluded a different operability status than that indicated by the referring center. This study indicates that early diagnosis and timely treatment of CTEPH is challenged by suboptimal acute PE follow-up and patient referral practices. Nonadherence to guideline recommendations may be impacted by various barriers to care, which were shown to vary by geographical region.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10880430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early recognition and diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is crucial for improving prognosis and reducing the disease burden. Established clinical practice guidelines describe interventions for the diagnosis and evaluation of CTEPH, yet limited insight remains into clinical practice variation and barriers to care. The CTEPH global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY) was developed to gather insights into the current diagnosis, treatment, and management of CTEPH and to identify unmet medical needs. This paper focuses on the recognition and diagnosis of CTEPH and the referral and evaluation of these patients. The survey was offered to hospital-based medical specialists through Scientific Societies and other medical organizations, from September 2021 to May 2022. Response data from 353 physicians showed that self-reported awareness of CTEPH increased over the past 10 years among 96% of respondents. Clinical practices in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) follow-up and CTEPH diagnosis differed among respondents. While 50% of respondents working in a nonexpert center reported to refer patients to an expert pulmonary hypertension/CTEPH center when CTEPH is suspected, 51% of these physicians did not report referral of patients with a confirmed diagnosis for further evaluation. Up to 50% of respondents involved in the evaluation of referred patients have concluded a different operability status than that indicated by the referring center. This study indicates that early diagnosis and timely treatment of CTEPH is challenged by suboptimal acute PE follow-up and patient referral practices. Nonadherence to guideline recommendations may be impacted by various barriers to care, which were shown to vary by geographical region.

慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的识别、诊断和可操作性评估:全球横断面科学调查(CLARITY)。
早期识别和诊断慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)对于改善预后和减轻疾病负担至关重要。已有的临床实践指南描述了诊断和评估 CTEPH 的干预措施,但对临床实践差异和护理障碍的了解仍然有限。CTEPH全球横断面科学调查(CLARITY)的目的是了解CTEPH目前的诊断、治疗和管理情况,并确定尚未满足的医疗需求。本文的重点是 CTEPH 的识别和诊断以及这些患者的转诊和评估。该调查于 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 5 月期间通过科学协会和其他医疗组织向医院的医学专家发起。来自 353 名医生的回复数据显示,在过去 10 年中,96% 的受访者自我报告对 CTEPH 的认识有所提高。受访者在急性肺栓塞(PE)随访和 CTEPH 诊断方面的临床实践各不相同。在非专家中心工作的受访者中,50% 的人表示在怀疑有 CTEPH 时会将患者转诊至肺动脉高压/CTEPH 专家中心,但这些医生中 51% 的人并未表示会将确诊患者转诊接受进一步评估。在参与评估转诊患者的受访者中,多达 50% 的人得出的可手术状态与转诊中心的结论不同。这项研究表明,由于急性 PE 随访和患者转诊的做法不够理想,CTEPH 的早期诊断和及时治疗面临挑战。不遵守指南建议可能受到各种护理障碍的影响,这些障碍因地理区域而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信