A Systems-Thinking Model of Data Management and Use in US Archaeology

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY
Elizabeth Bollwerk, Neha Gupta, Jolene Smith
{"title":"A Systems-Thinking Model of Data Management and Use in US Archaeology","authors":"Elizabeth Bollwerk, Neha Gupta, Jolene Smith","doi":"10.1017/aap.2023.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OverviewArchaeology in the United States is caught in a “curation crisis” (Childs 1995; Childs and Warner 2019; Marquardt et al. 1982; SAA Advisory Committee on Curation 2003; Trimble and Marino 2003) and a “digital data crisis” (or “deluge”) more specifically (Bevan 2015; Clarke 2015; Kansa and Kansa 2021; Katsianis et al. 2022; Kersel 2015; McManamon et al. 2017:239–240; Rivers Cofield et al. 2024). Recent estimates suggest that, collectively, over 1.4 billion dollars are spent annually to support archaeological work that is mandated by federal law (SRI Foundation 2020). Although substantial efforts are underway to generate and provide mechanisms for managing, curating, and sharing the resultant digital data, we suggest that a critical step that has yet to be taken is to describe and visualize the components, connections, and causal dynamics of the US digital data system as it currently functions. Here, we specifically apply a “systems thinking” approach to produce such a high-level model of this system. We argue that understanding and visualizing this system will help us all “think bigger” (Heilen and Manney 2023); identify sources of knowledge, opportunities for critical analysis, collaboration, and capacity building; and increase much-needed archaeological digital literacy (Kansa and Kansa 2022). We conceptualize this as bringing “equilibrium” to the system, and in this article, we make several suggestions on how to bring this about. These insights can enable practitioners to better understand their roles in and contributions to the overall system and to evaluate efforts to improve data sharing, management, and curation practices not only within their organizations and departments but beyond.","PeriodicalId":7231,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeological Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Archaeological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2023.41","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OverviewArchaeology in the United States is caught in a “curation crisis” (Childs 1995; Childs and Warner 2019; Marquardt et al. 1982; SAA Advisory Committee on Curation 2003; Trimble and Marino 2003) and a “digital data crisis” (or “deluge”) more specifically (Bevan 2015; Clarke 2015; Kansa and Kansa 2021; Katsianis et al. 2022; Kersel 2015; McManamon et al. 2017:239–240; Rivers Cofield et al. 2024). Recent estimates suggest that, collectively, over 1.4 billion dollars are spent annually to support archaeological work that is mandated by federal law (SRI Foundation 2020). Although substantial efforts are underway to generate and provide mechanisms for managing, curating, and sharing the resultant digital data, we suggest that a critical step that has yet to be taken is to describe and visualize the components, connections, and causal dynamics of the US digital data system as it currently functions. Here, we specifically apply a “systems thinking” approach to produce such a high-level model of this system. We argue that understanding and visualizing this system will help us all “think bigger” (Heilen and Manney 2023); identify sources of knowledge, opportunities for critical analysis, collaboration, and capacity building; and increase much-needed archaeological digital literacy (Kansa and Kansa 2022). We conceptualize this as bringing “equilibrium” to the system, and in this article, we make several suggestions on how to bring this about. These insights can enable practitioners to better understand their roles in and contributions to the overall system and to evaluate efforts to improve data sharing, management, and curation practices not only within their organizations and departments but beyond.
美国考古学数据管理和使用的系统思维模型
概述美国考古学正陷入一场 "保存危机"(Childs,1995 年;Childs 和 Warner,2019 年;Marquardt 等,1982 年;SAA 保存咨询委员会,2003 年;Trimble 和 Marino,2003 年),更确切地说,是一场 "数字数据危机"(或 "洪水")(Bevan,2015 年;Clarke,2015 年;Kansa 和 Kansa,2021 年;Katsianis 等,2022 年;Kersel,2015 年;McManamon 等,2017:239-240 年;Rivers Cofield 等,2024 年)。最近的估算表明,每年用于支持联邦法律规定的考古工作的费用合计超过 14 亿美元(SRI 基金会,2020 年)。尽管目前正在做出大量努力,以生成并提供管理、整理和共享由此产生的数字数据的机制,但我们认为尚未采取的关键步骤是描述和可视化美国数字数据系统目前运作的组成部分、联系和因果动态。在此,我们特别运用了 "系统思维 "的方法来建立这一系统的高层次模型。我们认为,对这一系统的理解和可视化将有助于我们所有人 "想得更远"(Heilen 和 Manney,2023 年);确定知识来源、批判性分析机会、合作和能力建设;以及提高亟需的考古数字素养(Kansa 和 Kansa,2022 年)。我们将此概念化为实现系统的 "平衡",并在本文中就如何实现这一目标提出了若干建议。这些见解可使从业人员更好地了解他们在整个系统中的作用和贡献,并评估他们为改进数据共享、管理和策展实践所做的努力,不仅在他们的组织和部门内部,而且在组织和部门之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.40%
发文量
39
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信